By bongkey
I find it completely dumbfounding (and a little comical) that people use terms like socialism, communism, and fascism without knowing what they actually mean, and without knowing or realizing that they benefit directly from programs that could be labeled socialist (or communist, or fascist). The average right winger will tell you that, in practice, none of those governmental structures work, that the free market system and democracy are the only way to effectively govern, and that all socialism needs to be eradicated from the US. Unfortunately for most of them, they do not realize that they’re just as socialist as the next guy. As Bill Maher said “Its time to stop fighting it, and just come out of the closet….the love they’re denying is their love for Socialism”.
DonÂ’t believe me? Well, according to the Future of Freedom Foundation (a Libertarian think-tank), any government owned, funded, or subsidized operation is considered to be a socialist program. That would mean that anyone who uses programs or services like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, HUD, The Federal Reserve, The US Park System, The US Postal Service, The US Military, NPR, PBS, The VA, subsidies, bailouts, many television stations, prisons, public schools, interstate highways, libraries, police, firemen, farms, public utilities, airports, sports arenas, automobiles, etc. are supportive of socialism, and socialists by association. IsnÂ’t that how McCarthyism worked?
(ranting tangent)Now, its worth pointing out that while all people use/rely on those services on a daily basis, the ones who have the most to gain/lose from them is the rich, and by that I mean, the decision makers (there arenÂ’t many poor politicians on Capitol Hill), the business owners, the bankersÂ… Not the people who are making less than $200k/year working a shit job for whatever scratch they can make. The rich are the ones who are benefiting the most from these socialist programs through corporate welfare, or being able to pocket the profits during the good times (speculation on the markets), and marking the bad times with a public loss (bailouts anyone?!?). ItÂ’s like the old saying goes: