Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 16,961
- 10,347
- 1,138
Yes but what does Vishnu think?Not only is it a sin, but an abomination to/of God.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes but what does Vishnu think?Not only is it a sin, but an abomination to/of God.
Because there is no such thing as "sin". "Sin" is a childish, magical idea that we should have outgrown by now.
Spare me the bible bullshit. Not working. You might as well be posing in Greek. Does not compute
Let me guess. Leviticus 18:22, right?Not only is it a sin, but an abomination to/of God.
Are homosexual natures created by nurture, nature, or God?
I think the answer is is quite important as it would show us the cause/source of homosexuality.
If God, as believers think, then why is God creating gays?
Regards
DL
Matthew 19:11-12 11Jesus replied, "Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others-and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."
Matthew 19:11-12 11Jesus replied, "Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others-and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it
Eunuch being a person who chooses OR cannot reproduce. It has nothing to do with being homosexual.
His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
11But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
12For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
HUH?!?there's that awful word for the desert religions - who "choses" - are you a persecutor ... that in the end, believe it or not - is the crime.
Eunuch being a person who chooses OR cannot reproduce. It has nothing to do with being homosexual.
His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
11But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
12For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Eunuchs Are Gay. In Ancient times, Eunuch Was A Synonym ...
9 Timeless Truths About Eunuchs. Depiction of a Eunuch Officer About 1749. The term eunuch, in history and scripture, frequently referred to gay men. The term eunuch, in history, also referred toEunuchs Are Gay. In Ancient times, Eunuch Was A Synonym For Gay.
Some eunuchs are gay people. Ancient Jewish rabbis understood that some eunuchs were men or women uninterested in opposite sex marriage.www.gaychristian101.com
Nope.
Matthew
Chapter 19
1And it came to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings, he departed from Galilee, and came into the coasts of Judaea beyond Jordan;
2And great multitudes followed him; and he healed them there.
3The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?
4And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
7They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
8He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
9And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
10His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
11But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
12For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Here, Jesus is clearly talking about marriage and divorce which leads to the examples of eunuchs.
Children of gay marriages will be harmed more so than children of traditional marriages. It's a predictable surprise.You have no fucking idea what you are talking about. Where is the literature that shows that gay parenting harms children? And to say that gay marriage is harmful is even stupider because you do not have to be married to have children and gay people have been caring for children for a very long time. Marriage gives those kids the legal and financial benefits and security of having married parents. Don't dare suggest that I don't care about the children
I disagree.More stupid shit!
Been married for 38 years to the same woman.You're an INCEL aren't you? You have no respect for women, they know it and won't have anything to do with you
Is that supposed to be an answer Bubba? It's an appeal to ignorance and an appeal to authority logical fallacy .Where is the evidence?Children of gay marriages will be harmed more so than children of traditional marriages. It's a predictable surprise.
Why? You'd just ignore it. Besides, the full effect won't be known for a decade or so. And even then you'd just ignore that too.Show us the literature !