when there isn't anything you can post or show."You're not even trying to defend your stupid and dishonest tactic of looking at the short term instead of the trend. You just repeat your fallacy over and over. Making the same mistake with 4 different graphs doesn't make it any less of a mistake."
Mamooths pathetic reply since he IGNORED this chart that showed BOTH short trends in it:
Never once disputed that there has been a decline since 1979, even said so right here!
"For one thing most skeptics have acknowledged the decline, which happened before nearly 100 years earlier, then it came back up to the probably Century high in the late 1970's, before a new decline sets in."
You are a grossly dishonest person, one who deliberately ignore what others say because you are so wedded to a belief that you will twist or lie on anything to maintain your delusions. Skeptical science chart was misleading and dishonest, which is why I exposed it in POST 13, showing that declines and increases are cyclic, that skeptics don't dispute the decline, while YOU and others are resisting hard evidence that it is NOT currently declining and hasn't for 12 years now.
SSDD, shows a chart from a published paper showing a much longer cycle in which a similar low point was in the late 1920's to the early 1940's, to reach the century high in the early 1970's, similar to my statement I posted:
"then it came back up to the probably Century high in the late 1970's, "
You have tried hard to ignore the two sources showing a flat to a slight increase in ice cover since 2007, you once again show your overt dishonesty by posting a skeptical science chart starting in 1979, while the two charts I posted started in 2007 to show it is not declining anymore, in DEFIANCE to warmists scientists who predicted it would be all gone in the Summer time.
You are as usual pathetic in your dishonest lying presentations.
convenient ignorance.
That's precisely what they will say.
hahaha I believe it... He was only in it for the money.. He didn't believe any of the shit he spewed from his mouth, since he hasn't made any lifestyle changes that would be "in-line" with his rhetoric... I guess that's just for "everybody else" to do... Typical Leftist Marxist Democrat...
dude, they waited forty years and that wasn't long enough. no, no, let's say.........hmmmm another 11 years and then we'll die.
Yup, indeed it is! Religion is fine in and of itself, but when one becomes a fundamentalist of their religion, that becomes a problem (as it is usually anger/hate fueled and it usually renders the person blind to other ways of thinking). I used to be a fundamentalist of my Christian religion at one point during my short life. It led me to "war" against the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution. It blinded me. It didn't allow me to properly consider other theories, nor allow me to understand WHY I believe what I believe (as in, how the logic behind my beliefs flowed).
More bad news for the warmists propagandist, the Arctic region has stabilized with a forecast of increasing summer ice cover into the future. It never did agree with overrated warmist scientists who study that region, with their overblown no summer ice cover forecasts made in the PREVIOUS decade.
No Tricks Zone
Arctic Ice Gain Embarrasses Global Warming Scientists. 40-Year Meteorologist: “Don’t Be Surprised Over What Happens Next 10 -15 Years!
By P Gosselin on 21. April 2019
EXCERPT:
Yesterday I wrote here how some scientists misrepresent the observed data concerning Greenland ice melt in order to get the alarming results they want. There we see that Greenland has been melting, but recently much more slowly than what we are often led to believe.
Looking at the latest Greenland ice volume data from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI), we see that currently the ice volume is below normal, but well within the range of the past 17 years:
Data source: Danish Meteorological Institute. Chart by Kirye
=======================================================================================
It appears the Arctic sea have bottomed out, with increasing confidence of ice gain forecast into the near future. The silly overconfident predictions of the last decade have failed utterly. Summer Ice cover has stabilized or increased slightly in size since 2007.
The North Atlantic show signs of a cooling phase in the near future as well, already had some short cooling spells recently. The data shows a flattened trend of the last decade, meaning no more increasing warming trend anymore, the warming outflow is decreasing.
Even though you have been shown that the model used by these people fails 100% of the time you still use it.
We're in the interglacial cycle of a highly interconnected and complex system in the middle of an ice age. The threshold for extensive northern hemisphere glaciation is less than 2C away.
The near 1 watt/meter^2 shift in power output on the sun can easily tilt us into glaciation. The loss of just that much warming, over 72% of the globe, is having devastating consequences to the ENSO. A drop of over 2.5 deg C. so far in the oceans. It's only a matter of time before the atmosphere follows suit and the cooling has already started.
Given the belief that a net 0.6 W/m^2 is absorbed I can see how a 1 W/m^2 could start that shift. I don't believe many people realize what a precarious perch we are on with respect to northern hemisphere glaciation. There's a lot of land for glaciers to grow on. Albedo becomes a snowball rolling down a hill. That's how we can drop 5C to 8C in a hurry. Pardon the pun.
I was looking at the DMI data and found this:
