Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

[Billy_Bob]

Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

If you needed anything to visualize what Anthroprogenic Global Warming is being used to promote this is it. The veil has been removed.

"Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez released a video depicting how the Green New Deal would turn the U.S. into a Democratic socialist utopia, complete with a bullet train from New York City to D.C."

Ocasio-Cortez Promotes Green New Deal With Video That Envisions A Democratic Socialist Utopia

 

[night_son]

Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

If you needed anything to visualize what Anthroprogenic Global Warming is being used to promote this is it. The veil has been removed.

"Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez released a video depicting how the Green New Deal would turn the U.S. into a Democratic socialist utopia, complete with a bullet train from New York City to D.C."

Ocasio-Cortez Promotes Green New Deal With Video That Envisions A Democratic Socialist Utopia

The usual suspects will I . . . suspect . . . be right along to apply more of their postmodernist dog-chases-tail round of questioning in defense of socialism. However, I would only add to this topic how the Green New Deal is a vanguard for communism not-so-in-disguise, rather than socialism, which is more like stage one civilizational cancer. No, the GND proponents seem to wish to skip the socialist phase altogether in preference of running America right off that there cliff . . .

 

[jc456]

it's called jim jonesing. #jimjonesing

 

[jc456]

Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

If you needed anything to visualize what Anthroprogenic Global Warming is being used to promote this is it. The veil has been removed.

"Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez released a video depicting how the Green New Deal would turn the U.S. into a Democratic socialist utopia, complete with a bullet train from New York City to D.C."

Ocasio-Cortez Promotes Green New Deal With Video That Envisions A Democratic Socialist Utopia

The usual suspects will I . . . suspect . . . be right along to apply more of their postmodernist dog-chases-tail round of questioning in defense of socialism. However, I would only add to this topic how the Green New Deal is a vanguard for communism not-so-in-disguise, rather than socialism, which is more like stage one civilizational cancer. No, the GND proponents seem to wish to skip the socialist phase altogether in preference of running America right off that there cliff . . .

#jimjonesing

 

[sealybobo]

Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

If you needed anything to visualize what Anthroprogenic Global Warming is being used to promote this is it. The veil has been removed.

"Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez released a video depicting how the Green New Deal would turn the U.S. into a Democratic socialist utopia, complete with a bullet train from New York City to D.C."

Ocasio-Cortez Promotes Green New Deal With Video That Envisions A Democratic Socialist Utopia

Science is not lying, you are.

Evolution is real

Global Warming is real

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

 

[mamooth]

Our ongoing point is how denialism is based entirely on right-wing lunatic political babbling concerning the VastSecretGlobalSocialistPlot. Denialism has always had zilch to do with science. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly vanish along with it.

I thank Billy for proving that again with this thread.

Climate science is the polar opposite, as it crosses all political boundaries all across the world. If left-wing politics vanished, climate science wouldn't change a bit.

 

[SSDD]

Our ongoing point is how denialism is based entirely on right-wing lunatic political babbling concerning the VastSecretGlobalSocialistPlot. Denialism has always had zilch to do with science. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly vanish along with it.

I thank Billy for proving that again with this thread.

Climate science is the polar opposite, as it crosses all political boundaries all across the world. If left-wing politics vanished, climate science wouldn't change a bit.

I guess that is why when asked for observed, measured evidence to support your claims, you wack jobs tend to offer up "consensus" rather than evidence. In what other field of science is "consensus" offered up as evidence to support the mainstream hypothesis?

 

[skookerasbil]

Nobody takes the GND seriously except the k00ks.

Climate change has never even made it to being a ? at a presidential debate. Ever. So now we go from that to a socialist system? I'm thinking not.....in fact, who's with me if we get Vegas odds on this!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

If you needed anything to visualize what Anthroprogenic Global Warming is being used to promote this is it. The veil has been removed.

"Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez released a video depicting how the Green New Deal would turn the U.S. into a Democratic socialist utopia, complete with a bullet train from New York City to D.C."

Ocasio-Cortez Promotes Green New Deal With Video That Envisions A Democratic Socialist Utopia

Science is not lying, you are.

Evolution is real

Global Warming is real

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

When you got nothing.... Attack the POSTER....

Thanks for admitting you have lost the debate due to a lack of observed, definable, and repeatable facts..

 

[SSDD]

Green New Deal = Socialism in disguise to fool the people...

If you needed anything to visualize what Anthroprogenic Global Warming is being used to promote this is it. The veil has been removed.

"Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez released a video depicting how the Green New Deal would turn the U.S. into a Democratic socialist utopia, complete with a bullet train from New York City to D.C."

Ocasio-Cortez Promotes Green New Deal With Video That Envisions A Democratic Socialist Utopia

Science is not lying, you are.

Evolution is real

Global Warming is real

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

When you got nothing.... Attack the POSTER....

Thanks for admitting you have lost the debate due to a lack of observed, definable, and repeatable facts..

That's what cults do. When you look at the 10 warning signs that a group is, in fact, a cult, it is very difficult to say that the whole climate change movement is not a top shelf cult.


1. Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability.

2. No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry.

3. No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement.

4. Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies, and persecutions.

5. There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil.

6. Former members often relate the same stories of abuse and reflect a similar pattern of grievances.

7. There are records, books, news articles, or television programs that document the abuses of the group/leader.

7. There are records, books, news articles, or television programs that document the abuses of the group/leader.

9. The group/leader is always right.

10. The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing “truth” or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible.

Are there any of these that don't apply to the warmers among us across the board...and many of them apply to the luke warmers...

 

[gfm7175]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

 

[sealybobo]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

Idiot

 

[gfm7175]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

Idiot

Insult Fallacy. (Insults are not arguments)
Argument of the Stone Fallacy. (Dismissing an argument as absurd without counterargument is a logical fallacy, dude)

See to it.

 

[sealybobo]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

Idiot

Insult Fallacy. (Insults are not arguments)
Argument of the Stone Fallacy. (Dismissing an argument as absurd without counterargument is a logical fallacy, dude)

See to it.

I'm not going to argue with some internet nut fuck job who disagrees with 99% of the scientists who specialize on the subject.

Fuck you right wing idiots. You are ruining the planet and this country. Fucking idiots. You deny evolution, global warming, reality. Who are you? Are you a new rwnj? Like I'm going to get in the GW debate with another one of you wackos. GW is a fucking fact you flat earth idiot

Don't you know corporations who don't want to pay to go green are behind the denials? And of course Republicans represent those corporations and you swallow whatever the Republicans tell you to swallow.

You make me sick. Welcome. LOL.

During a recent hearing on the role of innovation in addressing climate change, several Republicans made faulty claims about the climate, past and present.

In an op-ed for Fox News, Rep. Lamar Smith, the chairman of the House science committee, made a host of false and misleading claims about climate change and related issues.

But that doesn't bother you right?

Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt suggests that global warming isn’t necessarily “a bad thing”

He's a corporate stooge. Are you? One thing i'll bet is you are a loyal Republican voter. That much I can tell.

In an interview on CNBC, Energy Secretary Rick Perry said carbon dioxide is not “the primary control knob” for the Earth’s temperature and climate. But scientists say it’s “extremely likely” that human activity — primarily CO2 emissions — is the main cause of global warming.

Who should I believe Rick Perry or science.

GOD I HATE YOU IDIOTS!!!

 

[sealybobo]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

Idiot

Insult Fallacy. (Insults are not arguments)
Argument of the Stone Fallacy. (Dismissing an argument as absurd without counterargument is a logical fallacy, dude)

See to it.

What argument did you make? You said global warming is fake. You provided no evidence. So I replied appropriately. You're a fucking idiot.

 

[sealybobo]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

God you suck for sucking me into this argument

Climate change denial, or global warming denial, is part of the global warming controversy. It involves denial, dismissal, or unwarranted doubt that contradicts the scientific opinion on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, its impacts on nature and human society, or the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions.[2][3][4]Some deniers endorse the term, while others prefer the term climate change skepticism.[3]Several scientists have noted that "skepticism" is an inaccurate description for those who deny anthropogenic global warming.[5][6][7] In effect, the two terms form a continuous, overlapping range of views, and generally have the same characteristics: both reject, to a greater or lesser extent, the scientific consensus on climate change.[8][9] Climate change denial can also be implicit, when individuals or social groups accept the science but fail to come to terms with it or to translate their acceptance into action.[10] Several social science studies have analyzed these positions as forms of denialism[8][9] and pseudoscience.[11]

The campaign to undermine public trust in climate science has been described as a "denial machine" organized by industrial, political and ideological interests, and supported by conservative media and skeptical bloggers to manufacture uncertainty about global warming.[12][13][14] In the public debate, phrases such as climate skepticism have frequently been used with the same meaning as climate denialism.[15] The labels are contested: those actively challenging climate science commonly describe themselves as "skeptics", but many do not comply with common standards of scientific skepticism and, regardless of evidence, persistently deny the validity of human caused global warming.[8]

Although scientific opinion on climate change is that human activity is extremely likely to be the primary driver of climate change,[16][17] the politics of global warming have been affected by climate change denial, hindering efforts to prevent climate change and adapt to the warming climate.[18][19][20] Those promoting denial commonly use rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of a scientific controversy where there is none.[21][22]

Of the world's countries, the climate change denial industry is most powerful in the United States.[23][24] From 2015 to 2017 (after having already served from 2003 to 2007), the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works was chaired by oil lobbyist and climate change denier Jim Inhofe, who had previously called climate change "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated against the American people" and claimed to have debunked the alleged hoax in February 2015 when he brought a snowball with him in the Senate chamber and tossed it across the floor.[25] He was succeeded in 2017 by John Barrasso, who similarly said: "The climate is constantly changing. The role human activity plays is not known."[26] Organised campaigning to undermine public trust in climate science is associated with conservative economic policies and backed by industrial interests opposed to the regulation of CO
2 emissions.[27] Climate change denial has been associated with the fossil fuels lobby, the Koch brothers, industry advocates and conservative think tanks, often in the United States.[19][28][29][30] More than 90% of papers sceptical on climate change originate from right-wing think tanks.[31] The total annual income of these climate change counter-movement-organizations is roughly $900 million.[32] Between 2002 and 2010, nearly $120 million (£77 million) was anonymously donated via the Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund to more than 100 organisations seeking to undermine the public perception of the science on climate change.[33] In 2013 the Center for Media and Democracy reported that the State Policy Network (SPN), an umbrella group of 64 U.S. think tanks, had been lobbying on behalf of major corporations and conservative donors to oppose climate change regulation.[34]

Since the late 1970s, oil companies have published research broadly in line with the standard views on global warming. Despite this, oil companies organized a climate change denial campaign to disseminate public disinformation for several decades, a strategy that has been compared to the organized denial of the hazards of tobacco smoking by the tobacco industry






So basically it's not just 100 scientists who believe global warming is real. It's research. Studies. Experiments. It's a collection of evidence that tells us no doubt men are causing global warming. Even most republicans admit it at this point.

So it's amazing to find someone like you who is still a flat earth freak.

What possible evidence can I show you that isn't already out there?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

God you suck for sucking me into this argument

Climate change denial, or global warming denial, is part of the global warming controversy. It involves denial, dismissal, or unwarranted doubt that contradicts the scientific opinion on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, its impacts on nature and human society, or the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions.[2][3][4]Some deniers endorse the term, while others prefer the term climate change skepticism.[3]Several scientists have noted that "skepticism" is an inaccurate description for those who deny anthropogenic global warming.[5][6][7] In effect, the two terms form a continuous, overlapping range of views, and generally have the same characteristics: both reject, to a greater or lesser extent, the scientific consensus on climate change.[8][9] Climate change denial can also be implicit, when individuals or social groups accept the science but fail to come to terms with it or to translate their acceptance into action.[10] Several social science studies have analyzed these positions as forms of denialism[8][9] and pseudoscience.[11]

The campaign to undermine public trust in climate science has been described as a "denial machine" organized by industrial, political and ideological interests, and supported by conservative media and skeptical bloggers to manufacture uncertainty about global warming.[12][13][14] In the public debate, phrases such as climate skepticism have frequently been used with the same meaning as climate denialism.[15] The labels are contested: those actively challenging climate science commonly describe themselves as "skeptics", but many do not comply with common standards of scientific skepticism and, regardless of evidence, persistently deny the validity of human caused global warming.[8]

Although scientific opinion on climate change is that human activity is extremely likely to be the primary driver of climate change,[16][17] the politics of global warming have been affected by climate change denial, hindering efforts to prevent climate change and adapt to the warming climate.[18][19][20] Those promoting denial commonly use rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of a scientific controversy where there is none.[21][22]

Of the world's countries, the climate change denial industry is most powerful in the United States.[23][24] From 2015 to 2017 (after having already served from 2003 to 2007), the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works was chaired by oil lobbyist and climate change denier Jim Inhofe, who had previously called climate change "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated against the American people" and claimed to have debunked the alleged hoax in February 2015 when he brought a snowball with him in the Senate chamber and tossed it across the floor.[25] He was succeeded in 2017 by John Barrasso, who similarly said: "The climate is constantly changing. The role human activity plays is not known."[26] Organised campaigning to undermine public trust in climate science is associated with conservative economic policies and backed by industrial interests opposed to the regulation of CO
2 emissions.[27] Climate change denial has been associated with the fossil fuels lobby, the Koch brothers, industry advocates and conservative think tanks, often in the United States.[19][28][29][30] More than 90% of papers sceptical on climate change originate from right-wing think tanks.[31] The total annual income of these climate change counter-movement-organizations is roughly $900 million.[32] Between 2002 and 2010, nearly $120 million (£77 million) was anonymously donated via the Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund to more than 100 organisations seeking to undermine the public perception of the science on climate change.[33] In 2013 the Center for Media and Democracy reported that the State Policy Network (SPN), an umbrella group of 64 U.S. think tanks, had been lobbying on behalf of major corporations and conservative donors to oppose climate change regulation.[34]

Since the late 1970s, oil companies have published research broadly in line with the standard views on global warming. Despite this, oil companies organized a climate change denial campaign to disseminate public disinformation for several decades, a strategy that has been compared to the organized denial of the hazards of tobacco smoking by the tobacco industry






So basically it's not just 100 scientists who believe global warming is real. It's research. Studies. Experiments. It's a collection of evidence that tells us no doubt men are causing global warming. Even most republicans admit it at this point.

So it's amazing to find someone like you who is still a flat earth freak.

What possible evidence can I show you that isn't already out there?

Using Wiki as a source......?????

Did you bother to even look at the far left wing BS sources and failed modeling you posted up? Idiot...

 

[gfm7175]

I'm not going to argue with some internet nut fuck job

Yet here you are replying to multiple posts that I have made. It appears as if you are lying to yourself... Also, an Insult Fallacy. Insults are not arguments.

who disagrees with 99% of the scientists who specialize on the subject.

Appeal to Popularity Fallacy. Climate "scientists" are anything BUT...

Fuck you right wing idiots. You are ruining the planet and this country. Fucking idiots.

Insult Fallacies coupled with Bigotry.

You deny evolution,

I actually accept evolution, but I realize that it is a religion rather than science. It can only be accepted/rejected on a faith basis.

global warming,

I reject anything which rejects logic, science, and mathematics, especially all at once...

reality.

I accept reality. Reality is defined by a branch of philosophy known as phenomenology. It is our own individual model of the universe and how it works. It is experienced uniquely by each individual.

Who are you? Are you a new rwnj? Like I'm going to get in the GW debate with another one of you wackos. GW is a fucking fact you flat earth idiot

More insults, more bigotry... NOT what a fact is. A fact is an assumed predicate. That's all a fact is. Facts are NOT universal truths, nor are they proofs. I do not believe in a flat earth...

Don't you know corporations who don't want to pay to go green are behind the denials? And of course Republicans represent those corporations and you swallow whatever the Republicans tell you to swallow.

More assumptions about me without actually hearing any of my arguments...

You make me sick. Welcome. LOL.

Your vitriol towards other people who may hold views differing from your own blinds you, and fills you with anger. Why are you so angry?

During a recent hearing on the role of innovation in addressing climate change, several Republicans made faulty claims about the climate, past and present.

In an op-ed for Fox News, Rep. Lamar Smith, the chairman of the House science committee, made a host of false and misleading claims about climate change and related issues.

But that doesn't bother you right?

Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt suggests that global warming isn’t necessarily “a bad thing”

He's a corporate stooge. Are you? One thing i'll bet is you are a loyal Republican voter. That much I can tell.

In an interview on CNBC, Energy Secretary Rick Perry said carbon dioxide is not “the primary control knob” for the Earth’s temperature and climate. But scientists say it’s “extremely likely” that human activity — primarily CO2 emissions — is the main cause of global warming.

Who should I believe Rick Perry or science.

GOD I HATE YOU IDIOTS!!!

Calm your temper a bit and I'd be willing to have a rational discussion with you...

 

[Sunsettommy]

Sealy bobo on a wild streak of irrationality, here is why I say this

"Climate change denial, or global warming denial, is part of the global warming controversy. It involves denial, dismissal, or unwarranted doubt that contradicts the scientific opinion on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, its impacts on nature and human society, or the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions.[2][3][4]Some deniers endorse the term, while others prefer the term climate change skepticism.[3]Several scientists have noted that "skepticism" is an inaccurate description for those who deny anthropogenic global warming.[5][6][7] In effect, the two terms form a continuous, overlapping range of views, and generally have the same characteristics: both reject, to a greater or lesser extent, the scientific consensus on climate change.[8][9] Climate change denial can also be implicit, when individuals or social groups accept the science but fail to come to terms with it or to translate their acceptance into action.[10] Several social science studies have analyzed these positions as forms of denialism[8][9] and pseudoscience.[11]"

The very first sentence kills itself,

Climate change denial, or global warming denial, is part of the global warming controversy. It involves denial, dismissal, or unwarranted doubt that contradicts the scientific opinion on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, its impacts on nature and human society, or the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions

word opinion upsized

Opinion?

No one denies climate changes, that is a long dead narrative warmist morons continually dig up in their idiotic smearing attacks on people who don't agree with them. The phrase climate change skepticism is a flat out lie, never seen that phrase outside of Wikipedia. Not only that skeptics acknowledge the obvious warming since the end of the LIA in the mid 1800's. Many right here agree there has been some warming, which is unsurprising as we have been warming out of the LIA

Now here is the part Sealybobo utterly fails to understand is that smearing, name calling people who do not agree with the AGW conjecture, due to numerous predictive/projective failures, is a sign of people who have been programmed to believe in something that can't be wrong, it is a sign of a Cult.

Calling people denialists is an offensive term, that has nothing to do with the basic rules of debate. You do it because you can't debate the topic itself, as it is unsupported by your pseudoscience claims, as it has been shown a failure many times. That is why YOU call people Denialists, "big oil" funding, push consensus nonsense, smear think tanks and change or lie about the "official" data.

The AGW conjecture fails because,

The Rate of warming per decade is 50% too low
ALL three short term per decade warming trends back to the 1800's are very similar
The number and power of Hurricanes are NOT increasing
The Number of Tornadoes are NOT increasing
The total snowfall amount is on the INCREASE
The rate of CO2 emission changes do NOT match with temperature changes on all time scales

and so on....

Only one of these that have been posted about in the warmist bible, the IPCC be wrong and the AGW dies. They are ALL wrong, thus your insistence in clinging to a proven dead AGW conjecture is a hallmark of a Cultist.

Carry on with your future insults, smears and idiotic replies.

 

[gfm7175]

Science is not lying, you are.

Global Warming is NOT science; it is religion. It rejects logic, science, and mathematics. It rejects logic because it is a circularly-defined buzzword, thus rendering any argumentation based on it to be void. It rejects the laws of thermodynamics as well as the stefan boltzmann law, and it thinks that models are data. We don't have the means to measure the temperature of Earth (not enough thermometers). This is where AGW rejects mathematics...

Evolution is real

Evolution is a religion; it is not science. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. Evolution may or may not be real.

Global Warming is real

Global Warming is NOT real. It outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.

Republicans are anti schools anti science and media. Anyone who might tell you the truth.

I am anti PUBLIC schools; not anti schools.

I am a fully supporter of science. It is YOU who is denying science...

I am not anti media... I am anti media propaganda...

Idiot

Insult Fallacy. (Insults are not arguments)
Argument of the Stone Fallacy. (Dismissing an argument as absurd without counterargument is a logical fallacy, dude)

See to it.

What argument did you make? You said global warming is fake. You provided no evidence. So I replied appropriately. You're a fucking idiot.

I've made separate arguments for GW denying logic, science, and mathematics. I don't waste my time making them for people who regularly insult me, though... It's not worth my time since you refuse to cool your temper enough to listen to my arguments...