Maybe this should be in the Conspiracy sub-forum........ All I read was he said she said allegation, supposition and innuendo.
The first amendment certainly protects your asshole..you never stop talking out of it.
In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.Maybe this should be in the Conspiracy sub-forum........ All I read was he said she said allegation, supposition and innuendo.
Whats the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy?
In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.Maybe this should be in the Conspiracy sub-forum........ All I read was he said she said allegation, supposition and innuendo.
Whats the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy?
Missing my point completely. That usually happens when someone reading what I post want's to "read into" in defense of their ideology.......... Try reading what I posted with an unbiased (non us vs them) mindset..........In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.Maybe this should be in the Conspiracy sub-forum........ All I read was he said she said allegation, supposition and innuendo.
Whats the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy?
Everyone has an ideological viewpoint. Are you saying one cannot have a view point and relay an accurate time line of events?
That would mean that only the people without a viewpoint can present stories but people without views dont exist. Very tricky
Missing my point completely. That usually happens when someone reading what I post want's to "read into" in defense of their ideology.......... Try reading what I posted with an unbiased (non us vs them) mindset..........In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.Maybe this should be in the Conspiracy sub-forum........ All I read was he said she said allegation, supposition and innuendo.
Whats the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy?
Everyone has an ideological viewpoint. Are you saying one cannot have a view point and relay an accurate time line of events?
That would mean that only the people without a viewpoint can present stories but people without views dont exist. Very tricky
Jeeze, you're kidding me right? Basic reading skills...... Look for the qualifiers........Missing my point completely. That usually happens when someone reading what I post want's to "read into" in defense of their ideology.......... Try reading what I posted with an unbiased (non us vs them) mindset..........In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.Maybe this should be in the Conspiracy sub-forum........ All I read was he said she said allegation, supposition and innuendo.
Whats the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy?
Everyone has an ideological viewpoint. Are you saying one cannot have a view point and relay an accurate time line of events?
That would mean that only the people without a viewpoint can present stories but people without views dont exist. Very tricky
What does that even mean. Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint? Or anything more specific than accusing me of bias?
Jeeze, you're kidding me right? Basic reading skills...... Look for the qualifiers........Missing my point completely. That usually happens when someone reading what I post want's to "read into" in defense of their ideology.......... Try reading what I posted with an unbiased (non us vs them) mindset..........In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.
Everyone has an ideological viewpoint. Are you saying one cannot have a view point and relay an accurate time line of events?
That would mean that only the people without a viewpoint can present stories but people without views dont exist. Very tricky
What does that even mean. Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint? Or anything more specific than accusing me of bias?
I said neither. Look up the word 'usually' and I have no idea how you came up with; "Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint?".
Come on, you're an intelligent human being, I'll give you that much, use your intelligence to see exactly what I meant, it's obvious.
Got cha
Jeeze, you're kidding me right? Basic reading skills...... Look for the qualifiers........Missing my point completely. That usually happens when someone reading what I post want's to "read into" in defense of their ideology.......... Try reading what I posted with an unbiased (non us vs them) mindset..........In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.
Everyone has an ideological viewpoint. Are you saying one cannot have a view point and relay an accurate time line of events?
That would mean that only the people without a viewpoint can present stories but people without views dont exist. Very tricky
What does that even mean. Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint? Or anything more specific than accusing me of bias?
I said neither. Look up the word 'usually' and I have no idea how you came up with; "Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint?".
Come on, you're an intelligent human being, I'll give you that much, use your intelligence to see exactly what I meant, it's obvious.
Oh I get it, you say things that you cant explain and then puts the burden on everyone else with vague responses like "read" and "understand".
All while not answering any questions that would help get to your point.
Nice trick
Looks like I gave you too much credit when I said you're an intelligent person.Jeeze, you're kidding me right? Basic reading skills...... Look for the qualifiers........Missing my point completely. That usually happens when someone reading what I post want's to "read into" in defense of their ideology.......... Try reading what I posted with an unbiased (non us vs them) mindset..........In this case? The viewer's ideological viewpoint....... Some will claim it's a strategy, from both sides, each individual will make up their mind based on what their political ideology is. A very few, myself included, will simply state that there is no hard concrete evidence to back up the claim and make no judgement one way or the other as to the veracity or lack there of with this story. Could be true, could be false.
Everyone has an ideological viewpoint. Are you saying one cannot have a view point and relay an accurate time line of events?
That would mean that only the people without a viewpoint can present stories but people without views dont exist. Very tricky
What does that even mean. Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint? Or anything more specific than accusing me of bias?
I said neither. Look up the word 'usually' and I have no idea how you came up with; "Are you disagreeing that everyone has an ideological viewpoint?".
Come on, you're an intelligent human being, I'll give you that much, use your intelligence to see exactly what I meant, it's obvious.
Oh I get it, you say things that you cant explain and then puts the burden on everyone else with vague responses like "read" and "understand".
All while not answering any questions that would help get to your point.
Nice trick
There actually are two very wealthy Koch brothers. They give a LOT of money to charity.
