AOC Is A Communist

"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." ― Margaret Thatcher

We are seeing how the "pay more than their fair share" is going in States like NY and California and Companies and the rich are leaving in droves. The right is making inroads in Europe because of the same shit. Socialism is unsustainable.



Capitalism is unsustainable, that's why it needs socialism to survive. Without socialism, there's no capitalism, yet without capitalism, socialism does well, even under economic sanctions from a world capitalist empire and threats of war. It survives without capitalism. The more advanced technology becomes, the more socialism is needed to fill the gap of unemployment.
 
Which is exactly why many Hispanics are flooding to the Republican party. They've heard about this "Democratic socialism" before. That's how it all starts just before they drop off the word Democratic. In their defense though, countries like Venezuela, Iran, Russia, and others do have democratic elections.
now the demfks are saying the hispanics aren't under socialist governing. hahahaahahahahaahahahaha. They think us stupid. We don't buy into their cons.
 
And destroy any incentive for innovation. Why the fuck would anyone want to waste their time inventing the next big gadget or software if there is no compensation.

Most inventors don't invent for money, including all of the scientists who are now researching new technology. Much of the R&D is funded by government programs and contracts. The Soviet Union gave us the first nuclear power plants, the first cell phones, the first vaccines for viruses, organ transplants, the first satellites, the first probes, the first space docking, the first space station, the first microwave ovens, lasers, LED lights, the first and first and first..etc.

AI i.e. artificial intelligence, will also be providing society with a lot of new inventions and technology.
 
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." ― Margaret Thatcher

We are seeing how the "pay more than their fair share" is going in States like NY and California and Companies and the rich are leaving in droves. The right is making inroads in Europe because of the same shit. Socialism is unsustainable.


Of course it has to be a change on the federal level as with everything. Now the federal level is GOP giveaway to the rich crap.
 
now the demfks are saying the hispanics aren't under socialist governing. hahahaahahahahaahahahaha. They think us stupid. We don't buy into their cons.
venezuela is still barely a democracy even with all the sanctions and covert operations against them. Most people in Venezuela don't want to go back to GOP supported scumbag oligarchs and United Fruit Company Etcetera or American oil companies for that matter.... It's almost time for us to show some responsibility for Latin America instead of screwing them over every time they try fair capitalism with a good safety net or socialism as understood everywhere but English speaking countries. Iran Russia have crappy elections to say the least.
 
Taken independently one would have to think a Communist could actually get themselves elected anywhere in the US. Considering the unlikelihood of that scenario, Occam’s Razor should make one realize that the proponents of the theory are not independent of the MAGA movement and, therefore, biased. THINK!
So, you're saying she is a Communist.
 
Most inventors don't invent for money, including all of the scientists who are now researching new technology. Much of the R&D is funded by government programs and contracts. The Soviet Union gave us the first nuclear power plants, the first cell phones, the first vaccines for viruses, organ transplants, the first satellites, the first probes, the first space docking, the first space station, the first microwave ovens, lasers, LED lights, the first and first and first..etc.

AI i.e. artificial intelligence, will also be providing society with a lot of new inventions and technology.
Try socialism or fair capitalism with democracy and good safety net, forget the Marxist dictatorships for crying out loud. It doesn't work. Not as bad as we have been brainwashed about but..... A lot of that is highly debatable to say the least.... The French first invented most of that lol
 
Most inventors don't invent for money, including all of the scientists who are now researching new technology. Much of the R&D is funded by government programs and contracts. The Soviet Union gave us the first nuclear power plants, the first cell phones, the first vaccines for viruses, organ transplants, the first satellites, the first probes, the first space docking, the first space station, the first microwave ovens, lasers, LED lights, the first and first and first..etc.

AI i.e. artificial intelligence, will also be providing society with a lot of new inventions and technology.
The first nuclear power plant was the ERB-1 that came in the US 3 years before the Soviets fired up their first one. The first cell phone was invented by Martin Cooper a Motorola researcher. Small Pox has had a vaccine since 1701 221 years before the USSR was even a country. American engineer Percy Spencer invented the first modern microwave off of research done in the UK, lasers another American. There was a Russian guy that claimed he invented the LED but other Soviet scientist dispute that. Goddamn your historically retarded.

The USSR may have started out strong in space but they lost in the end and collapsed because socialism is unsustainable.

I've watched video of North Korean citizens believing Kim-Jong Il invented shit like the hamburger. It's a cult of personality with you socialist.

Private industry is taking over most of the R&D Governments, just look at the space industry. Private industry can do it better cheaper.
 
venezuela is still barely a democracy even with all the sanctions and covert operations against them. Most people in Venezuela don't want to go back to GOP supported scumbag oligarchs and United Fruit Company Etcetera or American oil companies for that matter.... It's almost time for us to show some responsibility for Latin America instead of screwing them over every time they try fair capitalism with a good safety net or socialism as understood everywhere but English speaking countries. Iran Russia have crappy elections to say the least.
Why they coming here then?
 
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." ― Margaret Thatcher

We are seeing how the "pay more than their fair share" is going in States like NY and California and Companies and the rich are leaving in droves. The right is making inroads in Europe because of the same shit. Socialism is unsustainable.



Why they coming here then?
because GOP led sanctions have destroyed their economy? DUHHH
 
The first nuclear power plant was the ERB-1 that came in the US 3 years before the Soviets fired up their first one. The first cell phone was invented by Martin Cooper a Motorola researcher. Small Pox has had a vaccine since 1701 221 years before the USSR was even a country. American engineer Percy Spencer invented the first modern microwave off of research done in the UK, lasers another American. There was a Russian guy that claimed he invented the LED but other Soviet scientist dispute that. Goddamn your historically retarded.

The USSR may have started out strong in space but they lost in the end and collapsed because socialism is unsustainable.

I've watched video of North Korean citizens believing Kim-Jong Il invented shit like the hamburger. It's a cult of personality with you socialist.

Private industry is taking over most of the R&D Governments, just look at the space industry. Private industry can do it better cheaper.
The USSR was communist for crying out loud. Socialism is always democratic. Stop listening to communists Nazis and Tories about what socialism is. The worst liars in history. Check out every socialist party ever in the modern world. They beat the communists bad and that's why every modern country but us is Socialist now. Course the English don't know it... Even the UK and the US had socialists before World War one. Were against the war so were outlawed basically. Poor Eugene Debs...
 
The first nuclear power plant was the ERB-1 that came in the US 3 years before the Soviets fired up their first one. The first cell phone was invented by Martin Cooper a Motorola researcher. Small Pox has had a vaccine since 1701 221 years before the USSR was even a country. American engineer Percy Spencer invented the first modern microwave off of research done in the UK, lasers another American. There was a Russian guy that claimed he invented the LED but other Soviet scientist dispute that. Goddamn your historically retarded.

The USSR may have started out strong in space but they lost in the end and collapsed because socialism is unsustainable.

I've watched video of North Korean citizens believing Kim-Jong Il invented shit like the hamburger. It's a cult of personality with you socialist.

Private industry is taking over most of the R&D Governments, just look at the space industry. Private industry can do it better cheaper.

Leonid Kupriyanovich

Soviet radio engineer and inventor Leonid Kupriyanovich got a patent in 1957 for a wireless phone device. The first portable cell phone weighed 6.6 lbs. The inventor managed to reduce its weight to 1.1 lbs one year later. In 1961, he presented a portable handset weighing only 0.15 lbs.

Source:


Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant​


"Connected to the power grid in June 1954, Obninsk was the first grid-connected nuclear power plant in the world,[2]"

Source:


The EBR-1 that you mentioned was just a research reactor. The Soviets had the F-1, predating the EBR-1.

Nikolay Devyatkov​

Inventor of Microwave Vacuum Tubes:

More sources for Soviet Inventions:






A large majority of important inventions come from university scientists, government researchers, and independent inventors, for whom monetary gains aren't dominant considerations, if at all. The profit incentive for innovation is profoundly contradictory. For the profit incentive to operate, innovators must be able to gain monopoly control over the innovation and bar competitors, or else the first innovator’s profit will be small and fleeting. However, the legal and extra-legal means that capitalist innovators use to gain such monopoly power (patents and predatory tactics) prevent the rapid diffusion of new products and processes. It actually undermines innovation.

Notice how patents need the strong hand of the government to enforce them. Without the social apparatus of the state, there's no real innovation under capitalism.

As capitalist innovators follow the guide of profits, the following problems arise:

1) Innovations are disproportionally directed at upper-income consumers.

2) The public good is largely ignored in the innovation process. A company buys the parents to control a certain technological innovation with the purpose of controlling and even suppressing it, to avoid the expense of having to retool or restructure its operation with that new technology.

3) Under capitalism, many products are designed to fail after an X amount of time or use. This practice is known as "planned obsolescence". Soviet products were designed to last.

4) The monopoly power required to stimulate innovation leads to high monopoly prices for the resulting product, limiting the use of the new innovation and hence reducing the benefit from it.

5) Much innovation activity is pure waste, as firms devote innovation resources toward the end of defeating rivals rather than benefitting consumers.

While capitalism does promote the development of the forces of production, it does so in a manner that is severely flawed. Capitalism can promote innovation only if the state and other non-capitalist institutions play an active role in organizing and financing the innovation process. It can do so only with significant monopoly power and barriers to entry that simultaneously promote and hinder technical progress. And it produces a severely distorted innovation process that, after a certain stage of development, may subtract as much from human welfare as it contributes.

.For those interested, here are some socialist responses to this common misconception that capitalism results in more technological innovation than socialism:






Capitalism will soon be replaced by a non-profit system of production, due to advanced, 21st-century automation technology and AI. A non-profit system of production is the "non-scary", more palatable way of saying "socialism".
 
Last edited:
Every state is a dictatorship, including ours here in America. It's either the dictator of the wealthy elites, serving their vested interests at everyone else's expense, or the dictatorship of the proletariat i.e. working class. The United States will eventually adopt socialism out of necessity due to advanced automation and AI. The more efficient production becomes the less need there is for wage-labor, hence the necessity to adopt a non-profit mode of production. This is inevitable, to the point that even billionaires recognize this.












UBI or "Universal Basic Income" is a bailout ploy for the rich, where the government sends all of their customers a monthly check, with the hopes that they will use that money to buy the products and services that the rich are selling. UBI is capitalism on life support. These billionaires see the writing on the wall, due to advanced 21st century automation technology and AI. Socialism is the non-profit system of the future, that will replace capitalism, just as capitalism replaced chattel slavery and feudalism.

debatable . we just we just need to tax the rich more like their fair share and pass a living wage health care for all day care paid parental leave college and training great infrastructure and vacations just like every other modern country. We are the richest country by far- everybody should be having a good time instead of just the rich after 40 years of GOP giveaway to the rich and letting things slide.....
 
Last edited:
we just we just need to tax the rich more like their fair share and pass a living wage health care for all day care paid parental leave college and training great infrastructure and vacations just like every other modern country. We are the richest country by far- everybody should be having a good time instead of just the rich after 40 years of GOP giveaway to the rich and letting things slide.....

I agree with much of what you're saying there, Franco. Nonetheless, as technology advances, it reduces the need for human labor, hence the need for the adoption of a non-profit system of production a.k.a. "Socialism". So what you're saying is good, to the extent that people still have jobs and technological innovation isn't being undermined to save capitalism. The wealthy employer class loves capitalism, it's the source of their financial security and power. So, they might very well force the government to hand everyone a monthly check to keep capitalism on life support, for at least a few more decades while the ruling elites figure out how to cull the herd of worthless, unemployed peasants. People will be consigned to the compost heap.

No jobs = no wages = no customers = no markets, capitalism, or capitalists.







Do you think the billionaires are talking about giving everyone a UBI check because they "love the people" and they've been "touched" by the angel of human solidarity and compassion? No. They know that advanced 21st-century automation technology and artificial intelligence are going to replace human labor and when that occurs, society is forced, by necessity, to adopt a non-profit system of production. Advanced technology = socialism. American socialism will be American, not Russian or Chinese. It will be democratic socialism.
 
Leonid Kupriyanovich

Soviet radio engineer and inventor Leonid Kupriyanovich got a patent in 1957 for a wireless phone device. The first portable cell phone weighed 6.6 lbs. The inventor managed to reduce its weight to 1.1 lbs one year later. In 1961, he presented a portable handset weighing only 0.15 lbs.

Source:


Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant​


"Connected to the power grid in June 1954, Obninsk was the first grid-connected nuclear power plant in the world,[2]"

Source:


The EBR-1 that you mentioned was just a research reactor. The Soviets had the F-1, predating the EBR-1.

Nikolay Devyatkov​

Inventor of Microwave Vacuum Tubes:

More sources for Soviet Inventions:






A large majority of important inventions come from university scientists, government researchers, and independent inventors, for whom monetary gains aren't dominant considerations, if at all. The profit incentive for innovation is profoundly contradictory. For the profit incentive to operate, innovators must be able to gain monopoly control over the innovation and bar competitors, or else the first innovator’s profit will be small and fleeting. However, the legal and extra-legal means that capitalist innovators use to gain such monopoly power (patents and predatory tactics) prevent the rapid diffusion of new products and processes. It actually undermines innovation.

Notice how patents need the strong hand of the government to enforce them. Without the social apparatus of the state, there's no real innovation under capitalism.

As capitalist innovators follow the guide of profits, the following problems arise:

1) Innovations are disproportionally directed at upper-income consumers.

2) The public good is largely ignored in the innovation process. A company buys the parents to control a certain technological innovation with the purpose of controlling and even suppressing it, to avoid the expense of having to retool or restructure its operation with that new technology.

3) Under capitalism, many products are designed to fail after an X amount of time or use. This practice is known as "planned obsolescence". Soviet products were designed to last.

4) The monopoly power required to stimulate innovation leads to high monopoly prices for the resulting product, limiting the use of the new innovation and hence reducing the benefit from it.

5) Much innovation activity is pure waste, as firms devote innovation resources toward the end of defeating rivals rather than benefitting consumers.

While capitalism does promote the development of the forces of production, it does so in a manner that is severely flawed. Capitalism can promote innovation only if the state and other non-capitalist institutions play an active role in organizing and financing the innovation process. It can do so only with significant monopoly power and barriers to entry that simultaneously promote and hinder technical progress. And it produces a severely distorted innovation process that, after a certain stage of development, may subtract as much from human welfare as it contributes.

.For those interested, here are some socialist responses to this common misconception that capitalism results in more technological innovation than socialism:






Capitalism will soon be replaced by a non-profit system of production, due to advanced, 21st-century automation technology and AI. A non-profit system of production is the "non-scary", more palatable way of saying "socialism".

Yay you got most of that shit from Wikipedia you know the site that can be edited by anyone. You keep on spreading that propaganda.

Socialism and or Communism will never work without murdering millions of people. The overwhelming majority of people like to be compensated for their work attaboys from your Government masters just don't cut it for sane people.

I work hard to have nicer things than my neighbors in your non-profit world there is no reason for nice things everybody but the ones at the top will all have the same crappy shit.
 
The USSR was communist for crying out loud. Socialism is always democratic. Stop listening to communists Nazis and Tories about what socialism is. The worst liars in history. Check out every socialist party ever in the modern world. They beat the communists bad and that's why every modern country but us is Socialist now. Course the English don't know it... Even the UK and the US had socialists before World War one. Were against the war so were outlawed basically. Poor Eugene Debs...

Socialism is the process that leads to high communism. Communism is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money.
 
I agree with much of what you're saying there, Franco. Nonetheless, as technology advances, it reduces the need for human labor, hence the need for the adoption of a non-profit system of production a.k.a. "Socialism". So what you're saying is good, to the extent that people still have jobs and technological innovation isn't being undermined to save capitalism. The wealthy employer class loves capitalism, it's the source of their financial security and power. So, they might very well force the government to hand everyone a monthly check to keep capitalism on life support, for at least a few more decades while the ruling elites figure out how to cull the herd of worthless, unemployed peasants. People will be consigned to the compost heap.

No jobs = no wages = no customers = no markets, capitalism, or capitalists.







Do you think the billionaires are talking about giving everyone a UBI check because they "love the people" and they've been "touched" by the angel of human solidarity and compassion? No. They know that advanced 21st-century automation technology and artificial intelligence are going to replace human labor and when that occurs, society is forced, by necessity, to adopt a non-profit system of production. Advanced technology = socialism. American socialism will be American, not Russian or Chinese. It will be democratic socialism.

I have lived in France and Spain when they had communist and socialist parties in their democracies and the Socialist parties won and the communist ones disappeared with the USSR aid. I never saw a single socialist party that was for anything but what I say, fair capitalism with a good safety net. Never saw anything about nonprofit. It asks too much of human beings and then you have to have a dictator ship to enforce it and that's communism. I don't really think jobs are going to be replaced by a I anytime soon really..... All I can say is vote Democratic- they are the Socialists here. so we can get some birth control going on here because it's getting to be too many damn people in the world. And global warming is here now. Get off my lawn lOL. Have you read Kurt Vonnegut's player piano? That's about this. Schenectady with everybody hanging around bars as far as I can remember lOL;;;
 
Yay you got most of that shit from Wikipedia you know the site that can be edited by anyone. You keep on spreading that propaganda.

Socialism and or Communism will never work without mudering millions of people. The overwhelming majority of people like to be compensated for their work attaboys from your Government masters just don't cut it for sane people.

Not all of my sources were Wikipedia. The fact that people have to support what they post on Wikipedia with evidence, be it in the form of scholarship, studies, or documentation, generally makes it a good source of information. Everything that was in that post can be verified by many different sources. Are you denying the fact, for example, that the Soviets already had a nuclear research plant before the EBR-1 that you mentioned? You claim I'm "historically retarded", when it's clearly you who has his head up his ass, not me.

Why did the US, along with over ten countries, invade Soviet Russia in 1918? Did they beat the Bolsheviks? No. Russia was an under-industrialized agrarian society full of illiterate peasants. Twenty years later, despite of all of the obstacles and challenges, it was an industrial juggernaut and rival of the capitalist powers that invaded it. Countries that had a long head start of industrialization, and yet were baffled, mesmerized by how Russia through socialism, had become a world power in less than 20 years. What took the US and other Western capitalist-run countries over 100 years to develop, a socialist Russia did it in 20 years.

Four million Nazis invaded the Soviet Union. Seven out of ten Nazis were fighting on the Eastern Front. Operation Barbarossa resulted in millions of dead Germans and 27 million dead Soviets. Much of the infrastructure in Western Russia was devastated by the war. If it wasn't for the Soviet Union's great sacrifice, we would all now be speaking German and saluting a flag with a Swastika. The United States lost 460,000 Americans in WW2 and the Soviets lost tens of millions of its citizens. There was no "marshal plan" for Russia after the war, despite of its great contribution to the Allied victory.

The Soviets, the socialists, had to pick themselves up by their bootstraps after the second world war and rebuild a country left in ruins. Notwithstanding, despite all of this, the Soviet Union by the late 1950s, was a world superpower rivaling the United States and all of Western capitalism. A socialist nation, that for all intents and purposes, was in a state of war since its founding in 1917. Capitalist powers doing everything possible to destroy it. To pretend that the USSR was a complete failure and didn't accomplish anything is a gross misrepresentation of the facts, of reality. It's a disingenuous, desperate, silly claim.

Did capitalism defeat and replace chattel slavery and feudalism in one single swoop of the sword? Did it take just a few decades for the mercantile class, the merchants of Europe to replace the kings and nobles? How long did it take for capitalists to defeat the monarchies and replace them with capitalist-ruled republics? It took centuries. When material conditions permitted the merchants to become industrialists, during the industrial revolution, that's when capitalism replaced chattel slavery and feudalism. When the appropriate technology was available, that gave birth to capitalism. Likewise, when the required technology becomes available, that's when socialism will replace capitalism.
 
Last edited:
I have lived in France and Spain when they had communist and socialist parties in their democracies and the Socialist parties won and the communist ones disappeared with the USSR aid. I never saw a single socialist party that was for anything but what I say, fair capitalism with a good safety net. Never saw anything about nonprofit. It asks too much of human beings and then you have to have a dictator ship to enforce it and that's communism. I don't really think jobs are going to be replaced by a I anytime soon really..... All I can say is vote Democratic- they are the Socialists here. so we can get some birth control going on here because it's getting to be too many damn people in the world. And global warming is here now. Get off my lawn lOL. Have you read Kurt Vonnegut's player piano? That's about this. Schenectady with everybody hanging around bars as far as I can remember lOL;;;

Malthusianism is evil, so get rid of the overpopulation canard, lest you start supporting genocide. The dictatorship of the working class is democratic. The people dictate, not vested interests or a small wealthy elite. You complain a lot about authoritarianism but don't mention the fact that in capitalism, the workplace is run like a totalitarian state. The place where people spend most of their waking hours is run like an absolute dictatorship. Even Adam Smith, the father of capitalism in his book "The Wealth Of Nations", calls the capitalists "masters" and the workers, "servants". Ironically, you're 100% for that, but not for a democratic system of production, where workers are in control of the productive enterprise.

When was the last time you participated in an election at work? Did you elect your leaders at work? Do you own the productive enterprise with your fellow workers or is it one man at the top or a small group of millionaires, dictating everything to everyone? You demand democracy in politics but not in the workplace. That's weird, assuming you're actually a champion of democracy and liberty. At least with the government, we can cast a vote. Not so in the capitalist workplace.
 

Forum List

Back
Top