ThunderKiss1965
Diamond Member
It didn't take the Soviets long to accomplish things because the Communist could literally work people to death and if they didn't get shit done on schedule they were murdered. Nothing like a good old purge to meet those goals.Not all of my sources were Wikipedia. The fact that people have to support what they post on Wikipedia with evidence, be it in the form of scholarship, studies, or documentation, generally makes it a good source of information. Everything that was in that post can be verified by many different sources. Are you denying the fact, for example, that the Soviets already had a nuclear research plant before the EBR-1 that you mentioned? You claim I'm "historically retarded", when it's clearly you who has his head up his ass, not me.
Why did the US, along with over ten countries, invade Soviet Russia in 1918? Did they beat the Bolsheviks? No. Russia was an under-industrialized agrarian society full of illiterate peasants. Twenty years later, despite of all of the obstacles and challenges, it was an industrial juggernaut and rival of the capitalist powers that invaded it. Countries that had a long head start of industrialization, and yet were baffled, mesmerized by how Russia through socialism, had become a world power in less than 20 years. What took the US and other Western capitalist-run countries over 100 years to develop, a socialist Russia did it in 20 years.
Four million Nazis invaded the Soviet Union. Seven out of ten Nazis were fighting on the Eastern Front. Operation Barbarossa resulted in millions of dead Germans and 27 million dead Soviets. Much of the infrastructure in Western Russia was devastated by the war. If it wasn't for the Soviet Union's great sacrifice, we would all now be speaking German and saluting a flag with a Swastika. The United States lost 460,000 Americans in WW2 and the Soviets lost tens of millions of its citizens. There was no "marshal plan" for Russia after the war, despite of its great contribution to the Allied victory.
The Soviets, the socialists, had to pick themselves up by their bootstraps after the second world war and rebuild a country left in ruins. Notwithstanding, despite all of this, the Soviet Union by the late 1950s, was a world superpower rivaling the United States and all of Western capitalism. A socialist nation, that for all intents and purposes, was in a state of war since its founding in 1917. Capitalist powers doing everything possible to destroy it. To pretend that the USSR was a complete failure and didn't accomplish anything is a gross misrepresentation of the facts, of reality. It's a disingenuous, desperate, silly claim.
Did capitalism defeat and replace chattel slavery and feudalism in one single swoop of the sword? Did it take just a few decades for the mercantile class, the merchants of Europe to replace the kings and nobles? How long did it take for capitalists to defeat the monarchies and replace them with capitalist-ruled republics? It took centuries. When material conditions permitted the merchants to become industrialists, during the industrial revolution, that's when capitalism replaced chattel slavery and feudalism. When the appropriate technology was available, that gave birth to capitalism. Likewise, when the required technology becomes available, that's when socialism will replace capitalism.
As far as conquering Russia they have a long history of throwing bodies at their enemies. The Tzars and later the Communist didn't give a shit how many of their citizens died as long as they kept power. There is also the shitty weather an enemy had to contend with.
If the Nazi's hadn't been fighting on two fronts and the Japanese hadn't attacked Pearl Harbor the Soviet Union would have been hammed between the two axis powers. Hitler making military decisions on the Eastern front was also a boon to the USSR. Oh yeah the supplies from the capitalistic US to the Communist was also a deciding factor.
You should also know that Churchill wanted Russia taken down after WWII. If he could have convinced the US the Soviet Union would have been toast.