What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anyone who EVER says, “The science is settled” about ANYTHING is a liar and should not be trusted

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
31,997
Reaction score
20,829
Points
1,915
The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
5,834
Reaction score
6,048
Points
1,893
Location
In your head
The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.
I agree with everything you said, but I refuse to roll over for the "New Science" or "Follow the Science" bullshit that dementia Joe, Jay Inslee, Fauci, CDC, WHO are pushing.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
31,997
Reaction score
20,829
Points
1,915
People who say the science is settled, or follow the science have no idea whatsoever what science actually is.

There is no such thing as 'the science'

What we have are political hacks undermining the credibility of actual science.


Just look at this sack of shit.


Here is a great list of disproven scientific theories.

 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
5,834
Reaction score
6,048
Points
1,893
Location
In your head
People who say the science is settled, or follow the science have no idea whatsoever what science actually is.

There is no such thing as 'the science'

What we have are political hacks undermining the credibility of actual science.


Just look at this sack of shit.


Here is a great list of disproven scientific theories.

When our children and grandchildren ask us did you bankrupt the world and it is still uninhabitable, Obummer can say "YES WE DID!"
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
9,778
Reaction score
4,937
Points
893
The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.
I agree with everything you said, but I refuse to roll over for the "New Science" or "Follow the Science" bullshit that dementia Joe, Jay Inslee, Fauci, CDC, WHO are pushing.

Are you educated as an epidemiologist?
 

Natural Citizen

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
13,919
Reaction score
7,093
Points
1,095
Just look at this sack of shit.


Here is a great list of disproven scientific theories.


The very nature of science is about asking more questions. It's about admitting that we do not have all of the answers and that more questions are always necessary. That's what science is.

What we have going on are people with political science degrees and common hacks in mainstream media running interference for them and all they're accomplishing is undermining the public's trust in actual science while reinforcing an agenda.

To just say, oh, we're following the science, is just a convenient way to avoid actually having to discuss or even acknowledge legitimate questions. It's a convenient way to remove legitimate scientific discussion from agenda driven political science. What they're effectively saying is, oh, don't worry, we have all of the answers so no more questions need to be asked, just do what we say and maybe we'll stop bullying everyone around at the barrel of our government gun once you gove us the power we're trying to aquire. They're redefining science itself as the public perceives it to suit a political agenda. They're certainly invalidating the public's trust in actual science. And it's completely strategic. What they're doing is running a charade in order to aquire power they don't have, power that they've always wanted, the power to dicatate all of our personal healthcare decisions. And what better way than to go the route of mandating intrusive medical procedures like vaccination if you want to work to provide for yourself or whatever. It's why we haven't heard anything much about government run healthcare lately. We haven't heard much about it because they're effectively running a live drill to accomplish just that very thing without having to debate it. They're getting people used to the idea that they need the government to tell them to wash their hands, cover their mouth, what medical procedure to get, etc. And people are just going along with it, even complaining about who goes first. It's that bad.

There's a lot I've been meaning to say about this topic particularly.

Ironically, the people popping off about 'the science' never show up in these threads. It's certainly no irony that the same crowd are generally the loudest proponents of government run healthcare. Which isn't socialism, to be clear. It's fascist. The biggest mistake people made was calling Obamacare socialism. It wasn't. It was patently fascist in every way. They operate with big business. The lobbyyists are the ones penning this stuff. And these companies are effctively the ones who will be enforcing the fed's dirty work.
 
Last edited:

occupied

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2011
Messages
26,733
Reaction score
7,427
Points
280
None of us would exist if science was as flawed as OP seems to be suggesting.
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
5,834
Reaction score
6,048
Points
1,893
Location
In your head
The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.
I agree with everything you said, but I refuse to roll over for the "New Science" or "Follow the Science" bullshit that dementia Joe, Jay Inslee, Fauci, CDC, WHO are pushing.

Are you educated as an epidemiologist?
Are you? Apparently Fauci wasted his money because he has contradicted EVERY statement that he has made regarding this scamdemic. But that's OK, that's where I get my solace, watching all of your virtue signalers running around with your masks that have been proven to be ineffective nee detrimental to your health and taking unvetted vaccines that have had serious consequences. LOL--carry on lemming.
 

Blackrook

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
19,573
Reaction score
8,465
Points
940
Scientists know much less than 1% of all there is to know.

No matter how much scientists learn, that will always be true.

But in each generation, scientists urge us to believe they know everything there is to know.
 

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
48,274
Reaction score
11,859
Points
2,040
Location
Western Va.
If you watch some of the science/archeology channels and specials you often hear the phrase "this discovery will change our understanding of ---". How is it that we had an understanding in the first place? Most of what we think we know about history is based on opinion rather than science. The victors write the history books and the media creates the heroes.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
31,997
Reaction score
20,829
Points
1,915
The science is settled on gravity.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!1111!1111@1@1#1@

You mean that it exists? Does anyone say that gravity does not exist?

Explain your point without being an idiot.
 

Grampa Murked U

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
86,302
Reaction score
27,585
Points
2,275
Location
Kansas City
The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.
The laws of physics were settled according to "science" but wait! There's more!


Believe the science is the stupidest saying ever. Science is NOT the definitive voice in all things. It is the investigative body of work that questions EVERYTHING in order to further human knowledge.

All this "follow the science" shit is RETARDED. Science is EVER EVOLVING because we are a curious but stupid creature.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$20.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top