Anyone who EVER says, “The science is settled” about ANYTHING is a liar and should not be trusted

[ColonelAngus]

The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.

 

[Natural Citizen]

People who say the science is settled, or follow the science have no idea whatsoever what science actually is.

There is no such thing as 'the science'

What we have are political hacks undermining the credibility of actual science.

 

[Concerned American]

The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.

I agree with everything you said, but I refuse to roll over for the "New Science" or "Follow the Science" bullshit that dementia Joe, Jay Inslee, Fauci, CDC, WHO are pushing.

 

[ColonelAngus]

People who say the science is settled, or follow the science have no idea whatsoever what science actually is.

There is no such thing as 'the science'

What we have are political hacks undermining the credibility of actual science.

Just look at this sack of shit.



Here is a great list of disproven scientific theories.

Superseded theories in science - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ColonelAngus]

This thread IS political because the left has made it a poltical issue. Good Lord.

 

[Concerned American]

People who say the science is settled, or follow the science have no idea whatsoever what science actually is.

There is no such thing as 'the science'

What we have are political hacks undermining the credibility of actual science.

Just look at this sack of shit.



Here is a great list of disproven scientific theories.

Superseded theories in science - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

When our children and grandchildren ask us did you bankrupt the world and it is still uninhabitable, Obummer can say "YES WE DID!"

 

[surada]

The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.

I agree with everything you said, but I refuse to roll over for the "New Science" or "Follow the Science" bullshit that dementia Joe, Jay Inslee, Fauci, CDC, WHO are pushing.

Are you educated as an epidemiologist?

 

[Natural Citizen]

Just look at this sack of shit.



Here is a great list of disproven scientific theories.

Superseded theories in science - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The very nature of science is about asking more questions. It's about admitting that we do not have all of the answers and that more questions are always necessary. That's what science is.

What we have going on are people with political science degrees and common hacks in mainstream media running interference for them and all they're accomplishing is undermining the public's trust in actual science while reinforcing an agenda.

To just say, oh, we're following the science, is just a convenient way to avoid actually having to discuss or even acknowledge legitimate questions. It's a convenient way to remove legitimate scientific discussion from agenda driven political science. What they're effectively saying is, oh, don't worry, we have all of the answers so no more questions need to be asked, just do what we say and maybe we'll stop bullying everyone around at the barrel of our government gun once you gove us the power we're trying to aquire. They're redefining science itself as the public perceives it to suit a political agenda. They're certainly invalidating the public's trust in actual science. And it's completely strategic. What they're doing is running a charade in order to aquire power they don't have, power that they've always wanted, the power to dicatate all of our personal healthcare decisions. And what better way than to go the route of mandating intrusive medical procedures like vaccination if you want to work to provide for yourself or whatever. It's why we haven't heard anything much about government run healthcare lately. We haven't heard much about it because they're effectively running a live drill to accomplish just that very thing without having to debate it. They're getting people used to the idea that they need the government to tell them to wash their hands, cover their mouth, what medical procedure to get, etc. And people are just going along with it, even complaining about who goes first. It's that bad.

There's a lot I've been meaning to say about this topic particularly.

Ironically, the people popping off about 'the science' never show up in these threads. It's certainly no irony that the same crowd are generally the loudest proponents of government run healthcare. Which isn't socialism, to be clear. It's fascist. The biggest mistake people made was calling Obamacare socialism. It wasn't. It was patently fascist in every way. They operate with big business. The lobbyyists are the ones penning this stuff. And these companies are effctively the ones who will be enforcing the fed's dirty work.

 

[occupied]

None of us would exist if science was as flawed as OP seems to be suggesting.

 

[Concerned American]

The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.

I agree with everything you said, but I refuse to roll over for the "New Science" or "Follow the Science" bullshit that dementia Joe, Jay Inslee, Fauci, CDC, WHO are pushing.

Are you educated as an epidemiologist?

Are you? Apparently Fauci wasted his money because he has contradicted EVERY statement that he has made regarding this scamdemic. But that's OK, that's where I get my solace, watching all of your virtue signalers running around with your masks that have been proven to be ineffective nee detrimental to your health and taking unvetted vaccines that have had serious consequences. LOL--carry on lemming.

 

[progressive hunter]

None of us would exist if science was as flawed as OP seems to be suggesting.

and yet again you fail to explain how he is so wrong,,,

 

[Blackrook]

Scientists know much less than 1% of all there is to know.

No matter how much scientists learn, that will always be true.

But in each generation, scientists urge us to believe they know everything there is to know.

 

[Toro]

The science is settled on gravity.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!1111!1111@1@1#1@

 

[whitehall]

If you watch some of the science/archeology channels and specials you often hear the phrase "this discovery will change our understanding of ---". How is it that we had an understanding in the first place? Most of what we think we know about history is based on opinion rather than science. The victors write the history books and the media creates the heroes.

 

[ColonelAngus]

But but but but

The science is settled!

Townhall

Townhall is the leading source for conservative news, political cartoons, breaking stories, election analysis and commentary on politics and the media culture. An information hub for conservatives, republicans, libertarians, and liberty-loving Americans.

finance.townhall.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

The science is settled on gravity.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!1111!1111@1@1#1@

You mean that it exists? Does anyone say that gravity does not exist?

Explain your point without being an idiot.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The scientific method includes welcoming challenges to the conclusions of the posed hypothesis.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the earth was the center of the universe?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought protons, neutrons, and electrons are the smallest particles?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that Dinosaurs were more like lizards? now we know they were more like birds, with feathers.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought Pluto was a true planet?

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that we are all born as a BLANK SLATE? Now we know we have much information in our brains based on genes.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought the universe was static? That was Einstein. The Hubble telescope blew that out of the water.

What if we said THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED when we thought that FIRE is an element?

I could go on and on.

Anyone who says the science is settled on global warming is one of 3 things:

1) A douchbag uninformed parrot
2) a terrible scientist
3) a politician or business person looking to make a dime off a grift.

The laws of physics were settled according to "science" but wait! There's more!



Believe the science is the stupidest saying ever. Science is NOT the definitive voice in all things. It is the investigative body of work that questions EVERYTHING in order to further human knowledge.

All this "follow the science" shit is RETARDED. Science is EVER EVOLVING because we are a curious but stupid creature.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The science is settled on gravity.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!1111!1111@1@1#1@

Actually science is not settled on gravity.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]