How many dysfunctional election cycles are we going to endure before we accept the necessity of this reform?
www.thenation.com
"The current US electoral process is not what democracy looks like."
Sure it is.
You vote, and the perosn with the majority of votes wins.
Just like everywhere else
"“Democracies around the world—old democracies, new democracies—have in their constitutions an affirmative right to vote. It’s remarkable to me that the United States does not have that guarantee in our Constitution. I think a lot of our problems come back to this issue.”
The reason for this difference is simple and obvious:
In the US there are no national elections; all elections are state elections.
As such your right to vote is a state-level right.
This right is protected by several amendments to the US constitution, and federal law.
"administration of elections has been left to states with radically different standards. This makes no sense, considering the history of voting rights struggles."
When you realize all elections are state elections it makes perfect sense, as each of the 50 states have the power to decide for itself how its elections are run, within the limits of federal law and the US constitution.
"Even when the system melted down in 2000—when the Supreme Court intervened to halt the ballot recount in Florida, which could have determined a different winner in that year’s presidential race"
This isn't a systemic melt-down, this is the system working as intended.
Indeed. it is an example of how the federal government protects voting in state-level elections.
"That tension was highlighted by Justice Antonin Scalia during the
Bush v. Gore arguments in December 2000, when he went out of his way to observe that there is no federal constitutional guarantee of a right to vote for president."
Of course not - your state grants you the privilege. It need not do so.
As intended.