Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Washington, D.C. — Today Georgia U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff introduced the Right to Vote Act, legislation to create a first-ever affirmative Federal voting rights guarantee for all U.S. citizens.
You may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
^Speaking of those people^14th Amendment, Nazi.
God but you mothefuckers are stupid.
I never thought about that voting wasn't a "right' per se since legal status is primarily what is thought about, when as a minor about focused on becoming legal age, a felon who served the time can be reinstated to vote, but yes..no actual stated "right to vote" for anyone. I'm concerned some might contemplate a potential mandatory voting for the future for multiple countries, but I've been personally a bit more grumbly lately so maybe I'm not looking enough at the potential positive outcomes...so there's thatYou may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
You may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
That part is what I wrote and is just a fact as plain as the nose on your face.. and you know it.The part about, "some people here don't want other people being able to vote", just shows how full of shit you really are.
So then you literally supportThe part of, Federal voting rights guarantee for all U.S. citizens, that IS the key to what we want, and it's already there for us.
But with forked tongue. No, it's obviously not "there for us" yet. Do you seriously think Senator Ossoff would write up and introduce such a proposal if it were? Nothing better to do, hmmmmm?the Right to Vote Act, legislation to create a first-ever affirmative Federal voting rights guarantee for all U.S. citizens.
Indeed, however one must differentiate between "voter fraud", which has proven insignificant time and again, and vote tampering carried out by election workers and associated officials. Internet connections make such tampering easy, though perhaps not so easy to cover up. Tampering can include allowing partisan hacks to stand around entrances to polling places intimidating voters, gerrymandering, deliberately restricting the number of voting machines available in certain areas, and demanding ID where voter names, addresses, and phone numbers are already well established and affirmed with a compared signature. Mail in ballots have largely begun to eliminate such nonsense, thank goodness.Common sense: anyone who supports fair voting process supports having a clean (hint: no internet connection with machines.... what fools...during) national election. I worked at a polling station years ago and saw on a small scale several "grey areas", and I wasn't at all focused on looking for any thing out of the ordinary. That was back in the day when, at least an illusion of a fair and untainted election was the vibe, so I had little concern!
You may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
You made an utterly false and utterly stupid claim. Voter integrity laws endanger your Reich, as you depend on election fraud to maintain power.^Speaking of those people^
I’m going to throw a bone in part of your argument GN about voters being intimidated by people standing too close to them, aka the “partisan poll watchers”. I can only use my imagination to think of people truly feeling intimidated by poll watchers. I don’t claim to know all watchers, so maybe there are a few big burly guys in the mix and you’re referencing people who are physically frail and mentally challenged. I am a small framed female and even then would not feel physically intimidated by large males, even if they were standing within inches of me. Nowadays, all that’s required is a hard faked coughing spell- that’ll clear the area either that or… well I’ll save that thought because some reader might not know I’m joking lolIndeed, however one must differentiate between "voter fraud", which has proven insignificant time and again, and vote tampering carried out by election workers and associated officials. Internet connections make such tampering easy, though perhaps not so easy to cover up. Tampering can include allowing partisan hacks to stand around entrances to polling places intimidating voters, gerrymandering, deliberately restricting the number of voting machines available in certain areas, and demanding ID where voter names, addresses, and phone numbers are already well established and affirmed with a compared signature. Mail in ballots have largely begun to eliminate such nonsense, thank goodness.
Yes, I’ve experienced a similar thing in local elections. The city had to create a law about 10 years or so ago, to keep what I think of as “solicitors” to be so many feet away from the doors of each polling station. Both sides have clusters of promoters hanging out who are eager to hand you their campaign materials before you go into the voting precinct. I’ve never liked that, but now they don’t bother you if you don’t give them any eye contact, forget about being friendly, and I tend to walk fast anyway lolI used the term "partisan hacks" trying to eliminate such confusion. Yes, they are most often referred to as "poll watchers" now, however even a partisan poll watcher could theoretically be serving a legitimate purpose like monitoring vote counts or perhaps collecting exit poll information to be reported on after the fact. Poll "workers" are, of course, fine. But people making an overt show of local partisan unity (in addition to the sign wars) is what I've experienced in the past and meant by "intimidation." I don't care what party it is. When several local bigshots, say the school board chair, township head, and the police chief all gather around where you're standing in line minding your own business, and they greet you, introduce themselves, try to hand you their partisan ballot literature,.. it's fucking annoying as shit and the message is quite clear. No physical "intimidation" required whatsoever.
No one possesses a federal right to vote. Look it up. Quote any law you can find stating the contrary.Who in America of voting age does not have a right to vote?
Where do you get your info from?
You're an illiterate, reactionary waste of my time.There is a federal right to vote, the 14th Amendment.
No one possesses a federal right to vote. Look it up. Quote any law you can find stating the contrary.
And I don't care that you actually watch Tucker Carlson and take what he says so damned seriously.
Who in America of voting age does not have a right to vote?
Where do you get your info from?
But wait....we're oppressing you because we think you need a picture ID to vote
