Any Document Signed by Biden with Autopen is Terminated –

Evey single one of his aides
I doubt that. Because that would be confession to a 10 or 20 year federal felony for a start.

Forging a federal official's signature can lead to a penalty of up to 20 years in federal prison and significant fines,

Are you sure they admitted forging Biden's signature?
 
I doubt that. Because that would be confession to a 10 or 20 year federal felony for a start.
Of course you would, because you are Ratty. You get it wrong 1,000% of the time.
Forging a federal official's signature can lead to a penalty of up to 20 years in federal prison and significant fines,

Are you sure they admitted forging Biden's signature?
Yup

 
Of course you would, because you are Ratty. You get it wrong 1,000% of the time.

Yup

So why hasn't Bondi announced any indictments against any of them?

Except the report didn't say they used the autopen without permission

From the report: The Oversight Committee found alarming deficiencies in the documentation and custody of the President’s decision binder, including instances where executive actions were executed without written authorization

You know that actions, especially pardons, can be executed on verbal authorization alone. There is no constitutional requirement that a pardon be signed by the president, as it specifies granted by the president.

"Being granted" means to be given or allowed something, either formally or informally, by someone or something with authority.
 
So why hasn't Bondi announced any indictments against any of them?

Except the report didn't say they used the autopen without permission

From the report: The Oversight Committee found alarming deficiencies in the documentation and custody of the President’s decision binder, including instances where executive actions were executed without written authorization

You know that actions, especially pardons, can be executed on verbal authorization alone. There is no constitutional requirement that a pardon be signed by the president, as it specifies granted by the president.

"Being granted" means to be given or allowed something, either formally or informally, by someone or something with authority.
The report was released and sent to the DOJ on Oct 29th, moron. The process is just starting at DOJ.

You don’t always have to expose what a colossal idiot you are.
 
The report was released and sent to the DOJ on Oct 29th, moron. The process is just starting at DOJ.

You don’t always have to expose what a colossal idiot you are.

It took less than two weeks for Halligan to indict James Comey.

The DOJ has had the congressional report for a month now, and nothing....
 
So why hasn't Bondi announced any indictments against any of them?

Except the report didn't say they used the autopen without permission

From the report: The Oversight Committee found alarming deficiencies in the documentation and custody of the President’s decision binder, including instances where executive actions were executed without written authorization

You know that actions, especially pardons, can be executed on verbal authorization alone. There is no constitutional requirement that a pardon be signed by the president, as it specifies granted by the president.

"Being granted" means to be given or allowed something, either formally or informally, by someone or something with authority.
Good luck with that.
 
Even Trump? Any evidence for that? So far I have found no evidence anywhere on the internet other than malicious accusations with nothing forensic to back them up:

Because you didn't look.

"WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department posted pardons online bearing identical copies of President Donald Trump's signature before quietly correcting them this week after what the agency called a "technical error."
 
Last edited:
correct me if i;m wrong , but the issue is far more the AP's ability to 'sign' the number of doc's it did (in the 11th hr) than any human could possibly focus on....~S~
 
//* President Trump still fighting these Deep State Criminal scum to the bitter end! Even if he has to go ot alone again, naturally. *//

Trump also threatened Joe Biden with perjury charges.

“Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby terminated, and of no further force or effect. The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States,” President Trump said.

From GP again. I suppose it never happened you elite scum. Eat it up.


This is shaky scary ground.....

Democrats are going to abuse this when they finally get the WH back.
 
15th post
Because you didn't look.

"WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department posted pardons online bearing identical copies of President Donald Trump's signature before quietly correcting them this week after what the agency called a "technical error."
I guess you didn't read the information in the link I posted.
 
Trump has admitted to using Autopen in form letters and autograph pics to kids. But no legal documents.
That is what the autopen is supposed to be for. That and an 'emergency' signature if a piece of legislation or other essential document needs immediate signature when the President is away from the White House. The latter is always documented and confirmed as the order of the President though. I'm reasonably certain that President Trump has not needed to use that in any situation yet though.
 
That is what the autopen is supposed to be for. That and an 'emergency' signature if a piece of legislation or other essential document needs immediate signature when the President is away from the White House. The latter is always documented and confirmed as the order of the President though. I'm reasonably certain that President Trump has not needed to use that in any situation yet though.
No it isn't. It's for convenience and is as binding as a wet ink signature.

Always has been, always will be.
 
Back
Top Bottom