Meathead
Diamond Member
Your fantasies are only valid until the end of your nose.
If only you had video of Biden admitting to your accusations, like we have of Trump.
If only.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your fantasies are only valid until the end of your nose.
If only you had video of Biden admitting to your accusations, like we have of Trump.
If only.
Has he? Where is your documentation that he has?Trump has used auto pen. Where is the documentation of that?
The EO's done by autopen are going to be terminated and there's nothing the left can do about it. Hopefully a full investigation ensues, but I'm not holding my breath.
Sounds wonderful but I'm pretty sure this is heading to SCOTUS.Let me buy you a clue. Any presidential Executive Order, can be countermanded by a proceeding Executive Order.
executive orders can be "thrown out" through several means:
By a new president
A sitting president can revoke, amend, or replace any executive order, including those from their predecessors, through a new executive order.
This is a common occurrence during presidential transitions, often referred to as the "pendulum effect," where incoming presidents reverse the policies of the previous administration.
I don't think the courts (any courts) would touch the issue of executive order signed by autopen.Sounds wonderful but I'm pretty sure this is heading to SCOTUS.
It's stepping on pardoning power.I don't think the courts (any courts) would touch the issue of executive order signed by autopen.
Since the current president can affirm or rescind any previous executive order. Why would the courts weigh in on something that has a simple political solution.
The pardon power is something the courts would have real trouble with. Since a presidential pardon doesn't even require the president sign it.It's stepping on pardoning power.
That's what I was saying.The pardon power is something the courts would have real trouble with.
What you didn't say is that by having real trouble with it, they would punt it out of court.That's what I was saying.
So she signed docs previously signed by Lincoln?The pardon power is something the courts would have real trouble with. Since a presidential pardon doesn't even require the president sign it.
Pardons can be issued in any form, by anyone acting on instructions of the president.
President Lincoln's Secretary of State, William H. Seward, signed many of his pardons, often by countersigning documents that were first signed by Lincoln and then submitted for the affixing of the Great Seal of the United States. These official pardons provided clemency to individuals and were a part of Lincoln's broader use of his presidential power to grant pardons and show mercy.
No, he issued pardons based on papers that Lincoln signed.So she signed docs previously signed by Lincoln?
An accusation with no evidenceAnd how is this the same as underlings using the auto pen without any direction from Biden?
Well then, that is forgery.No, he issued pardons based on papers that Lincoln signed.
The pardons did not bear Lincolns signature, but instead Seward signed Lincoln's name.
A human precursor to auto pen.
Yet all of those pardons were legal.Well then, that is forgery.
Next?
They were never challenged. Tater’s are being challenged, Short Bus.Yet all of those pardons were legal.
The courts accepted them.
NEXT!!!!
No, courts did not reject any of Abraham Lincoln's pardons; rather, individuals sometimes rejected or failed to accept them, and the Supreme Court later upheld the principle that a pardon must be accepted to be validWell then, that is forgery.
Next?
They havent been before the courts as forgeries yetThey were never challenged. Tater’s are being challenged, Short Bus.
Won't know until the left freaks out, 'er I mean responds.What you didn't say is that by having real trouble with it, they would punt it out of court.
The courts themselves challenge everything put before them.They were never challenged. Tater’s are being challenged, Short Bus.