Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[jc456]

You mean like you're a degreed engineer? That kind of truth?

especially. 48 year career, One fking company at that!!!!

 

[jc456]

Google says otherwise.

is google always right, or do they merely post data from others and those others are faking shit? Again, you have no idea if there is a hightide reading or a big boat went by creating waves which moved the ticker on the gauge. You know fking nothing but someone's posting.

 

[ding]

especially. 48 year career, One fking company at that!!!!

Except you aren't an engineer.

 

[jc456]

Except you aren't an engineer.

Well I made a lot of money if I wasn't one. A lot

 

[ding]

is google always right, or do they merely post data from others and those others are faking shit? Again, you have no idea if there is a hightide reading or a big boat went by creating waves which moved the ticker on the gauge. You know fking nothing but someone's posting.

In this case the data is overwhelming.

And you have one picture to cover the entire planet for all times.

 

[ding]

Well I made a lot of money if I wasn't one. A lot

I don't believe that one either.

 

[jc456]

I don't believe that one either.

I really don't give a shit.

 

[jc456]

In this case the data is overwhelming.

And you have one picture to cover the entire planet for all times.

well no, there are other pictures, there's also the fact that key west is still there below sea level. Miami? hilarious the truths you ignore.

 

[ding]

I really don't give a shit.

I know. You have no honor.

 

[ding]

well no, there are other pictures, there's also the fact that key west is still there below sea level. Miami? hilarious the truths you ignore.

You accusing me of ignoring data is funny.

 

[ding]

My honor is top of the chart. Again, I don't need your approval for my honor cuck!!!

You're angry. It's understandable.

 

[jc456]

You accusing me of ignoring data is funny.

what data? I gave you a photo of a physical monument that you ignored. Not data. The fact that you're incapable of making a judgement of water levels is hilarious, and it's you with no honor.

 

[ding]

what data? I gave you a photo of a physical monument that you ignored. Not data. The fact that you're incapable of making a judgement of water levels is hilarious, and it's you with no honor.

What data? The decades of thousands continuously monitored tidal gauges and the massive dataset of satellite altimetry that corroborates the decades of thousands continuously monitored tidal gauge data.

 

[ding]

The mean is inconsistent since levels change every minute of every day . Especially over time. Who’s validating all data?

All readings are taken into account.

NOAA Tides & Currents

CO-OPS provides the national infrastructure, science, and technical expertise to monitor, assess, and distribute tide, current, water level, and other coastal oceanographic products and services that support NOAA's mission of environmental stewardship and environmental assessment and prediction...

tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov

 

[jc456]

What data? The decades of thousands continuously monitored tidal gauges and the massive dataset of satellite altimetry that corroborates the decades of thousands continuously monitored tidal gauge data.

I never said you ignored it. you keep posting the graphs. Again, the levels are so unstable, I don't personally believe they accurately capture true sea levels. Far too many variables.

 

[jc456]

All readings are taken into account.

NOAA Tides & Currents

CO-OPS provides the national infrastructure, science, and technical expertise to monitor, assess, and distribute tide, current, water level, and other coastal oceanographic products and services that support NOAA's mission of environmental stewardship and environmental assessment and prediction...

tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov

and again, the link I provided weeks ago stated, that the mean wasn't a true representation and that a landmark was used for benchmarking.

 

[jc456]

You're angry. It's understandable.

are you clairvoyant?

 

[EMH]

You accusing me of ignoring data is funny.

You ignore data and insist only fudge matters.

 

[EMH]

Continuous monitoring for decades at thousands of locations

that have all said the same thing for decades = NO OCEAN RISE

and that's a great place for DOGE to start chopping... the fudgebaking liars lying about what those monitors really read as actual data.

 

[skookerasbil]

First ever blizzard warning issued in Louisiana... ....300 million people seeing this today.

Probably shitting their pants about a warming world


First-ever Blizzard Warning issued along Gulf Coast as deadly winter storm slams Texas