Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

Where’s data to validate your tide guides?
"Mean sea level" (MSL) refers to the average height of the ocean's surface, calculated by averaging out the variations caused by tides and waves over a long period of time, essentially representing the midpoint between high and low tide; it serves as a standard reference point for measuring land elevations and other heights above the sea level.



1737391730501.png


1737391781755.webp
 
"Mean sea level" (MSL) refers to the average height of the ocean's surface, calculated by averaging out the variations caused by tides and waves over a long period of time, essentially representing the midpoint between high and low tide; it serves as a standard reference point for measuring land elevations and other heights above the sea level.



View attachment 1068098

View attachment 1068100

Tidal gauges are useless without GPS receivers ... continents move ten times faster than sea level rise ... and they're subject to rebound and subsidence ... universally rejected as accurate by science ...

This paper discusses the errors and limitations of measurements ... mainly there's not enough data to get good readings ... but if we apply the math to the data we do have ... we get 3 mm/yr rise with an acceleration of 0.084 mm/yr/yr ... significantly below two feet by Year 2100 ... [yawn] ...

Our great-great-great-grandchildren will not notice ... and think we're stupider than the Asteroid Attacks freaks ...
 
Tidal gauges are useless without GPS receivers ... continents move ten times faster than sea level rise ... and they're subject to rebound and subsidence ... universally rejected as accurate by science ...

This paper discusses the errors and limitations of measurements ... mainly there's not enough data to get good readings ... but if we apply the math to the data we do have ... we get 3 mm/yr rise with an acceleration of 0.084 mm/yr/yr ... significantly below two feet by Year 2100 ... [yawn] ...

Our great-great-great-grandchildren will not notice ... and think we're stupider than the Asteroid Attacks freaks ...
Is it better than relying on this nonsense?
 
What's the elevation of the water level in each picture and when were each picture taken? What was the tide at the time each picture was taken? And do you have any pictures taken from the exact same spot?


Always "those were taken at high tide..."

That's always their excuse as to why all visual evidence shows NO OCEAN RISE.


The INVISIBLE "Ocean Rise," brought to you by CO2 FRAUD and their Zionist Fascist backers...
 
Tidal gauges are useless without GPS receivers ... continents move ten times faster than sea level rise ... and they're subject to rebound and subsidence ... universally rejected as accurate by science ...

This paper discusses the errors and limitations of measurements ... mainly there's not enough data to get good readings ... but if we apply the math to the data we do have ... we get 3 mm/yr rise with an acceleration of 0.084 mm/yr/yr ... significantly below two feet by Year 2100 ... [yawn] ...

Our great-great-great-grandchildren will not notice ... and think we're stupider than the Asteroid Attacks freaks ...



Keep 'em coming.

There has been NO OCEAN RISE because THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT.
 
Always "those were taken at high tide..."

That's always their excuse as to why all visual evidence shows NO OCEAN RISE.


The INVISIBLE "Ocean Rise," brought to you by CO2 FRAUD and their Zionist Fascist backers...
They record continuously.
 
Because their idiocy hurts the cause.

That can be discussed between ourselves ... without engaging the troll ... or at least focus on one thread ... as to not ruin all the threads ... that's what I did when I murdered Chick ... she was easy though ...

This prick is "greenhouse effect is a lie" all over again ... you should consider the silent treatment because what you are doing ...

... isn't working ...
 
I can't make out the elevation of the water level in each picture.
I can't make out when each picture was taken.
I can't make out what the tide was at the time each picture was taken.

And I don't understand how any comparison can be made from different angles and distances from the object being photographed. There's no ability to scale different perspectives.

Feel free to share with me your answers to these questions.
Right? You can’t see the bricks under her feet in the base going into the water. It’s what vindictiveness from you looks like.
Hilarious, spoiled loser
 
"Mean sea level" (MSL) refers to the average height of the ocean's surface, calculated by averaging out the variations caused by tides and waves over a long period of time, essentially representing the midpoint between high and low tide; it serves as a standard reference point for measuring land elevations and other heights above the sea level.



View attachment 1068098

View attachment 1068100
How does that mean accuracy? The oceans are not predictable
 
Gravity is ... and that's what we measure ... and we can measure gravity very very accurately ... time and distance, just that easy ...
Doesn’t change my point.

Gravity is consistent
 
So is mean sea level ... [giggle] ... it's called "cause-and-effect" ...
The mean is inconsistent since levels change every minute of every day . Especially over time. Who’s validating all data?
 
Back
Top Bottom