Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

I never said you ignored it. you keep posting the graphs. Again, the levels are so unstable, I don't personally believe they accurately capture true sea levels. Far too many variables.

Tidal Datums​


In general, a datum is a base elevation used as a reference from which to reckon heights or depths. A tidal datum is a standard elevation defined by a certain phase of the tide. Tidal datums are used as references to measure local water levels and should not be extended into areas having differing oceanographic characteristics without substantiating measurements. In order that they may be recovered when needed, such datums are referenced to fixed points known as bench marks. Tidal datums are also the basis for establishing privately owned land, state owned land, territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and high seas boundaries. Below are definitions of tidal datums maintained by the Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.

HAT
Highest Astronomical Tide
The elevation of the highest predicted astronomical tide expected to occur at a specific tide station over the time period of 40 years. The 40 years period will include 2 National Tidal Datum Epoch periods. This time period will be updated every 20 years. The present values are based on the time period of 2000-2040.
MHHW*
Mean Higher High Water
The average of the higher high water height of each tidal day observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. For stations with shorter series, comparison of simultaneous observations with a control tide station is made in order to derive the equivalent datum of the National Tidal Datum Epoch.
MHW
Mean High Water
The average of all the high water heights observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. For stations with shorter series, comparison of simultaneous observations with a control tide station is made in order to derive the equivalent datum of the National Tidal Datum Epoch.
DTL
Diurnal Tide Level
The arithmetic mean of mean higher high water and mean lower low water.
MTL
Mean Tide Level
The arithmetic mean of mean high water and mean low water.
MSL
Mean Sea Level
The arithmetic mean of hourly heights observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. Shorter series are specified in the name; e.g. monthly mean sea level and yearly mean sea level.
MLW
Mean Low Water
The average of all the low water heights observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. For stations with shorter series, comparison of simultaneous observations with a control tide station is made in order to derive the equivalent datum of the National Tidal Datum Epoch.
MLLW*
Mean Lower Low Water
The average of the lower low water height of each tidal day observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. For stations with shorter series, comparison of simultaneous observations with a control tide station is made in order to derive the equivalent datum of the National Tidal Datum Epoch.
LAT
Lowest Astronomical Tide
The elevation of the lowest predicted astronomical tide expected to occur at a specific tide station over the time period of 40 years. The 40 years period will include 2 National Tidal Datum Epoch periods. This time period will be updated every 20 years. The present values are based on the time period of 2000-2040.
GT
Great Diurnal Range
The difference in height between mean higher high water and mean lower low water.
MN
Mean Range of Tide
The difference in height between mean high water and mean low water.
DHQ
Mean Diurnal High Water Inequality
One-half the average difference between the two high waters of each tidal day observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. It is obtained by subtracting the mean of all the high waters from the mean of the higher high waters.
DLQ
Mean Diurnal Low Water Inequality
One-half the average difference between the two low waters of each tidal day observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. It is obtained by subtracting the mean of the lower low waters from the mean of all the low waters.
HWI
Greenwich High Water Interval
The average interval (in hours) between the moon's transit over the Greenwich meridian and the following high water at a location.
LWI
Greenwich Low Water Interval
The average interval (in hours) between the moon's transit over the Greenwich meridian and the following low water at a location.
Max Tide
Highest Observed Tide
The maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high water is due to the periodic tidal forces and the effects of meteorological, hydrologic, and/or oceanographic conditions.
Min Tide
Lowest Observed Tide
The minimum height reached by a falling tide. The low water is due to the periodic tidal forces and the effects of meteorological, hydrologic, and/or oceanographic conditions.
Station DatumA fixed base elevation at a tide station to which all water level measurements are referred. The datum is unique to each station and is established at a lower elevation than the water is ever expected to reach. It is referenced to the primary bench mark at the station and is held constant regardless of changes to the water level gauge or tide staff. The datum of tabulation is most often at the zero of the first tide staff installed.
National Tidal Datum EpochThe specific 19-year period adopted by the National Ocean Service as the official time segment over which tide observations are taken and reduced to obtain mean values (e.g., mean lower low water, etc.) for tidal datums. It is necessary for standardization because of periodic and apparent secular trends in sea level. The present NTDE is 1983 through 2001 and is actively considered for revision every 20-25 years. Tidal datums in certain regions with anomalous sea level changes (Alaska, Gulf of Mexico) are calculated on a Modified 5-Year Epoch.
 
and again, the link I provided weeks ago stated, that the mean wasn't a true representation and that a landmark was used for benchmarking.
It is considerably more accurate than a single data point every 100 years.
 
are you clairvoyant?
I didn't need to be clairvoyant. Not when you wrote that I like to watch other men fuck my wife for no other reason than I disagree with you. That would require you to be angry.
 
that have all said the same thing for decades = NO OCEAN RISE

and that's a great place for DOGE to start chopping... the fudgebaking liars lying about what those monitors really read as actual data.
INCORRECT
 
Incorrect. I honor the data and you are the one ignoring the data by calling it fudge.


... by documenting THAT IT IS FUDGE and that THE ACTUAL DATA showed NO WARMING

Exhibit A the atmosphere

 
... by documenting THAT IT IS FUDGE and that THE ACTUAL DATA showed NO WARMING

Exhibit A the atmosphere

You dismiss decades of tidal gauge measurements and millions of years of empirical climate evidence from the geologic record for no good reason.
 
You dismiss decades of tidal gauge measurements and millions of years of empirical climate evidence from the geologic record for no good reason.


No I "dismiss" easily discredited fudged FRAUD and prove Earth is neither warming nor experiencing an ongoing net ice melt.




Funny, perhaps the best ever views/posts ratio on USMB for a topic up only 2 months...

Ever wonder who is "viewing"

LOL!!!

LMFAO!!!!
 
No I "dismiss" easily discredited fudged FRAUD and prove Earth is neither warming nor experiencing an ongoing net ice melt.




Funny, perhaps the best ever views/posts ratio on USMB for a topic up only 2 months...

Ever wonder who is "viewing"

LOL!!!

LMFAO!!!!
You claim to have discredited it, but you haven't. You dismiss it just like you dismiss all of your defeats. You might as well be a socialist because that's what they do.
 
So when are you going to weigh in on sea level rise? And not just criticize the tidal gauge and satellite data but actually make a stand on what you believe. Are the seas rising or not and what's the basis for your belief.

I have many times ... 3.0 (±0.4) mm/yr with an acceleration of 0.084 (±0.025) mm/yr/yr ... and here's my citation ...

Basically you're saying math is trolling you ... and I agree ... you don't know why the equation for sea level rise is:

∆(sea level) = 0.042 mm/yr/yr t^2 + 3.0 mm t [where t=time in years] ... that's 460 mm by Year 2100 ... or a lousy foot and a half ... in 75 years ... ouch ... doesn't even flood Naples, Florida ... though I think Rockport, Texas goes under ... high tide was up over the road already last October ...

Most of the sea level rise is due to thermal expansion, though melting ice caps do contribute to the rise ... sea ice melting does nothing ... this does virtually nothing here on the West Coast ... LAX is 30 feet above ... you can see those burned down Malibu homes are easily 20 feet above sea level ... a recent visit to my childhood beach showed no change ... and hundreds of years before anything needs to be done at the rates specified above ...

[yawn] ...

Hint: ∫ x dx = (x^2)/2 + C ... mathing ... not trolling ...
 
Most of the sea level rise is due to thermal expansion, though melting ice caps do contribute to the rise



Then why isn't Surface Air Pressure rising???


LOL!!!


If Oceans are "warming" why aren't we seeing an increase in cane activity?
 
Basically you're saying math is trolling you ... and I agree ... you don't know why the equation for sea level rise is:
No, I am not basically saying that. You saying that is trying to troll me. The very thing you are railing against. Physician heal thyself.
 
∆(sea level) = 0.042 mm/yr/yr t^2 + 3.0 mm t [where t=time in years] ... that's 460 mm by Year 2100 ... or a lousy foot and a half ... in 75 years ... ouch ... doesn't even flood Naples, Florida ... though I think Rockport, Texas goes under ... high tide was up over the road already last October ...
No shit. What is it you think I have been trying to say?
 
Most of the sea level rise is due to thermal expansion, though melting ice caps do contribute to the rise ... sea ice melting does nothing ... this does virtually nothing here on the West Coast ... LAX is 30 feet above ... you can see those burned down Malibu homes are easily 20 feet above sea level ... a recent visit to my childhood beach showed no change ... and hundreds of years before anything needs to be done at the rates specified above ...

[yawn] ...
From what I have read they are saying about a third is due to thermal expansion.
 
So altimeter data? But that can't be accurate. <sarcasm>

No shit. What is it you think I have been trying to say?

From what I have read they are saying about a third is due to thermal expansion.

You are getting upset ... dear ... take a chill pill and relax ... this is all deflection ... and it's not trolling to call you on that ...

I'm asking you to confine your banter with these idiots to one thread ... and not despoil all the threads ... they don't want to learn from you, frankly, who can blame them ... you tend to be slipperier than a snake when you get cornered ... but please keep your arguments in one place for a change ...

I figured an indefinite integral would send you over the top ... so predictable ... so easy ... no wonder the trolls have your number ...
 
You are getting upset ... dear ... take a chill pill and relax ... this is all deflection ... and it's not trolling to call you on that ...

I'm asking you to confine your banter with these idiots to one thread ... and not despoil all the threads ... they don't want to learn from you, frankly, who can blame them ... you tend to be slipperier than a snake when you get cornered ... but please keep your arguments in one place for a change ...

I figured an indefinite integral would send you over the top ... so predictable ... so easy ... no wonder the trolls have your number ...
No. I'm not getting upset. I'm shooting straight. Your ego is getting in the way of seeing reality.
 
Oooooops

A facial to all the climate crusaders....and have to say, after 15 years in this forum, I'm laughing.

"A funny thing happened as the WaPo tried to map out half a billion years of global temperatures and the "disaster of global warming""

No global warming...not even close :funnyface::funnyface::funnyface:

MSM Journos Inadvertently Reveal Shocking Truth About Global Warming | ZeroHedge

Btw...note the source on the graph in the article :up:
/——/ President Trump ends global warming on day 1
1737562207079.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom