Anti-Gay cake jerk gets told to take a hike.

[Slyhunter]

If you don't think being gay is a choice, is being bisexual a choice?

I don't think that Bisexuality is a choice any more than homosexuality, heterosexuality or transsexuality is.

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

The voters in those states has not legalized gay marriage. Activist judges had allow their attempts to make it illegal. It's not the same thing. The voters don't want it.

 

[orogenicman]

I don't think that Bisexuality is a choice any more than homosexuality, heterosexuality or transsexuality is.

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

The voters in those states has not legalized gay marriage. Activist judges had allow their attempts to make it illegal. It's not the same thing. The voters don't want it.

Are you suggesting that courts in 26 states have made unlawful court orders? Because if that is your argument, you should post it on a conspiracy theory web site because, damn.

37 States with Legal Gay Marriage and 13 States with Same-Sex Marriage Bans - Gay Marriage - ProCon.org

26 by Court Decision
Alabama* (Feb. 9, 2015), Alaska (Oct. 17, 2014), Arizona (Oct. 17, 2014), California (June 28, 2013), Colorado (Oct. 7, 2014), Connecticut (Nov. 12, 2008), Florida (Jan. 6, 2015), Idaho (Oct. 13, 2014), Indiana (Oct. 6, 2014), Iowa (Apr. 24, 2009), Kansas (Nov. 12, 2014), Massachusetts (May 17, 2004), Montana (Nov. 19, 2014), Nevada (Oct. 9, 2014), New Jersey (Oct. 21, 2013), New Mexico (Dec. 19, 2013), North Carolina (Oct. 10, 2014), Oklahoma (Oct. 6, 2014), Oregon (May 19, 2014), Pennsylvania (May 20, 2014), South Carolina (Nov. 20, 2014), Utah (Oct. 6, 2014), Virginia (Oct. 6, 2014), West Virginia (Oct. 9, 2014), Wisconsin (Oct. 6, 2014), Wyoming (Oct. 21, 2014)

8 by State LegislatureDelaware (July 1, 2013), Hawaii (Dec. 2, 2013), Illinois (June 1, 2014), Minnesota (Aug. 1, 2013), New Hampshire (Jan. 1, 2010), New York (July 24, 2011), Rhode Island (Aug. 1, 2013), Vermont (Sep. 1, 2009)

3 by Popular VoteMaine (Dec. 29, 2012), Maryland (Jan. 1, 2013), Washington (Dec. 9, 2012)

Washington, DC legalized gay marriage on Mar. 3, 2010, the date marriage licenses became available to same-sex couples.

*On Mar. 3, 2015, the Alabama Supreme Court ordered the state's 68 probate judges to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, despite an earlier federal court ruling that struck down the state's gay marriage ban, and the US Supreme Court's decision to allow same-sex marriages to proceed in the state. The state Supreme Court gave probate judges five days to respond if they do not feel they have to follow the order.

 

[Ame®icano]

26 by court decision... LOL

This is how it works... even when people reject proposition thru the ballot, like California's Prop 8, it get's rejected by liberal court as something that people have no right to decide. But when people accept it thru the ballot, then its OK, since people have decided.

 

[eagle1462010]

Fine then........................Gonna be a cake to remember.

 

[orogenicman]

26 by court decision... LOL

This is how it works... even when people reject proposition thru the ballot, like California's Prop 8, it get's rejected by liberal court as something that people have no right to decide. But when people accept it thru the ballot, then its OK, since people have decided.

When the law is unconstitutional, the judiciary has an obligation to make a correction. There is much precedent for this.

 

[OKTexas]

If you don't think being gay is a choice, is being bisexual a choice?

I don't think that Bisexuality is a choice any more than homosexuality, heterosexuality or transsexuality is.

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

 

[orogenicman]

I don't think that Bisexuality is a choice any more than homosexuality, heterosexuality or transsexuality is.

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

And?

 

[OKTexas]

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

And?

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

 

[orogenicman]

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

And?

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

 

[OKTexas]

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

And?

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I don't think that Bisexuality is a choice any more than homosexuality, heterosexuality or transsexuality is.

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

The voters in those states has not legalized gay marriage. Activist judges had allow their attempts to make it illegal. It's not the same thing. The voters don't want it.

What the people say, doesn't matter either way.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

And?

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

No, that question is settled, obviously.

 

[OKTexas]

No the courts did that in the majority of the states.

And?

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

No, that question is settled, obviously.

Really, did I miss the supreme court decision, you got a link?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And?

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

No, that question is settled, obviously.

Really, did I miss the supreme court decision, you got a link?

What you missed, I gather, was the SC letting lower court decisions stand. That is a decision, without writing one. Try and keep up and just deal with the fact that gay marriage it here, so stop being queer.

 

[Esmeralda]

ooooooooooooo, anti-homosexual...omg

they should just start hanging these people..how dare anyone be ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL

I mean they are all so gentle and tolerant aren't they?

brother this is the last thing on the majority of the peoples minds on who the hell is Anti-homosexual

get over yourselves already

Actually, the majority of people in the US accept gays and support their rights. The majority of people in the US are concerned about hate and intolerance against homosexuals. Most people are not like you, Steph. They are good, open minded, generous spirited people. Not at all like you.

 

[peach174]

So I guess a bi should be able to marry both a man and a woman?

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

Gay marriage is illegal in most of states. It doesn't stop gays to demand to get married. If definition of marriage could be changed for gays and therefore become legal, whats preventing government to change the definition again if there is "popular demand" for it?

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

The voters in those states has not legalized gay marriage. Activist judges had allow their attempts to make it illegal. It's not the same thing. The voters don't want it.

What the people say, doesn't matter either way.

It used to be until Obama took over.
Part of his change America thing because the Dems don't like the people being well informed and in control.
Our Constitution and the bill of rights means nothing at all to this administration.

 

[peach174]

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

No, that question is settled, obviously.

Really, did I miss the supreme court decision, you got a link?

What you missed, I gather, was the SC letting lower court decisions stand. That is a decision, without writing one. Try and keep up and just deal with the fact that gay marriage it here, so stop being queer.

The vast majority wants gay marriage, just not being forced to participate in that lifestyle.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Silly. Bigomy is illegal. Perhaps you are confused as to what it means to be bisexual.

Not confused at all, who are we to deprive them the ability to marry the ones they love? Courts have already proven laws mean nothing.

If you don't like living in a democratic republic, may I suggest you find some other place to live?

That's not my argument. You said bigamy is illegal. I counter that gay marriage is illegal in most states.

Most states? You have that backwards. 37 states have legalized gay marriage. It is illegal in only 13 states.

The voters in those states has not legalized gay marriage. Activist judges had allow their attempts to make it illegal. It's not the same thing. The voters don't want it.

What the people say, doesn't matter either way.

It used to be until Obama took over.
Part of his change America thing because the Dems don't like the people being well informed and in control.
Our Constitution and the bill of rights means nothing at all to this administration.

The People have never been in control. We don't have mob rule, AKA democracy, here. How many times must this be said? The pitchforks are not in charge, and were never meant to be, ever.

 

[OKTexas]

And you're a liar, 26 of those 37 did not legalize gay marriage, the courts forced it on them, despite what their citizens wanted.

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

No, that question is settled, obviously.

Really, did I miss the supreme court decision, you got a link?

What you missed, I gather, was the SC letting lower court decisions stand. That is a decision, without writing one. Try and keep up and just deal with the fact that gay marriage it here, so stop being queer.

Of course the supremes have never changed direction, right? LMAO

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Are you suggesting that courts do not have the power to enforce the law or throw illegal laws out? Because they most certainly do.

Only suggestion I made was you lied when you said 37 states had made faghadist marriage legal. The question whether the courts have the authority to impose it on the states has yet to be determined.

No, that question is settled, obviously.

Really, did I miss the supreme court decision, you got a link?

What you missed, I gather, was the SC letting lower court decisions stand. That is a decision, without writing one. Try and keep up and just deal with the fact that gay marriage it here, so stop being queer.

The vast majority wants gay marriage, just not being forced to participate in that lifestyle.

This is not a lifestyle, this is a celebration of an American value, Equality.