Dare I mention that the Native Americans were primitive Hunter-Gatherers when Columbo got here? About the same state as Europeans were several thousand years earlier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RACISM!I return to the simple question. Why is Africa so screwed up. If blacks are so superior to whites, why are blacks overwhelmingly inferior to whites in terms of education, job type, and wealth?
It can't be because blacks are suddenly stupid. We have far too many who are highly educated and productive members of society. They are doctors, lawyers, and educators.
But underlying those successes are a huge mass of underachievers.
Why is that?
If blacks are so superior, what happened?
Idiots such as you ignore racist policies to make the dumb ass comments you have made.
What is the impact of Colonialism on Africa today?
Didnt watch the video, but i can instantly tell that the guy in the video benefited from colonialism. Look at his clothes and his eye glasses, and the books behind him. YOURE WELCOME!
He'd be better off wearing African clothing. What the hell is wrong with you people? Thanks for enslaving people? You're out of your tiny little mind. Without white interference they would be the same as everyone else.
Everyone enslaved everyone. Africans dont get a special pass, in fact, they are the worlds leading slavers in 2019. Dont lecture me about slavery.
Shut up. Africans are not the leading slavers. Ask the white Europeans in slavery now. You will be lectured because you're ignorant.
Libya's Migrant Economy Is a Modern Day Slave Market
Libya is an African nation.
Dare I mention that the Native Americans were primitive Hunter-Gatherers when Columbo got here? About the same state as Europeans were several thousand years earlier.
'Europe sucked wealth from Africa, in debt to continent'
What is the impact of Colonialism on Africa today?
If blacks were so superior, whitey could have NEVER set foot in Africa, dumbass.
'Europe sucked wealth from Africa, in debt to continent'
Inferior cultures are always easy to take advantage of. This is how the human race weeds out the weak people.
Inferior cultures use mass killing weapons to bully other nations, and divide the people to gain and maintain power. The fact here is Europe had nothing to build wealth and cheated people out of money.
Shut up. Africans are not the leading slavers. Ask the white Europeans in slavery now. You will be lectured because you're ignorant.Everyone enslaved everyone. Africans dont get a special pass, in fact, they are the worlds leading slavers in 2019. Dont lecture me about slavery.He'd be better off wearing African clothing. What the hell is wrong with you people? Thanks for enslaving people? You're out of your tiny little mind. Without white interference they would be the same as everyone else.Didnt watch the video, but i can instantly tell that the guy in the video benefited from colonialism. Look at his clothes and his eye glasses, and the books behind him. YOURE WELCOME!
Libya's Migrant Economy Is a Modern Day Slave Market
Libya is an African nation.
The UK is not.
Modern slavery in the UK - Anti-Slavery International
2019 UK annual report on modern slavery
What is the impact of Colonialism on Africa today?
If blacks were so superior, whitey could have NEVER set foot in Africa, dumbass.
You might want to go study this instead of posting idiocy.
'Europe sucked wealth from Africa, in debt to continent'
HOW? Once again for the stupid people. If black society and black people are so superior how did a few thousand whiteys conquer you?
Shut up. Africans are not the leading slavers. Ask the white Europeans in slavery now. You will be lectured because you're ignorant.Everyone enslaved everyone. Africans dont get a special pass, in fact, they are the worlds leading slavers in 2019. Dont lecture me about slavery.He'd be better off wearing African clothing. What the hell is wrong with you people? Thanks for enslaving people? You're out of your tiny little mind. Without white interference they would be the same as everyone else.
Libya's Migrant Economy Is a Modern Day Slave Market
Libya is an African nation.
The UK is not.
Modern slavery in the UK - Anti-Slavery International
2019 UK annual report on modern slavery
Hmm...pro-migrant anti-brexit website with an unmistakably communist symbol as their logo. Not sure if I trust the source as a fair arbiter of truth.
That is because this person needs medical attention. The hatred has eroded away any semblence of humanity.You arent defending your claim very well. Repeating "slave owners are conservatives" over and over again isnt going to cut it. Do you have a real argument or not?if they have slaves they are conservatives dip s***. Actually the conservative black Africans love money so they sold slaves to the whites and their culture was destroyed then and by colonialism after....They are definitely not conservatives, but those Africans sure love to enslave people. I blame their inferior culture.Yep conservatives have screwed over minorities forever. Slave traders, colonists, you name it-and the conservative politicians and monarchies behind them. They destroyed the culture and then complain about it. And they are still screwing them over....The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.
Did dip shit skinpimp....
Sub-Saharan is a geographical term.
If it makes you feel any better the Australian tribes that fall into the general Aboriginal Gene pools were just a slow to develop.
Now if you want to deny the gene pool identity of people who lived for the past one thousand years below the latitude of the Sahara go right ahead.
Other than that why don't you stop wasting people's time with childish semantics that have more to do with puke politics and I do with real historical fact.
Jo
What is the impact of Colonialism on Africa today?
If blacks were so superior, whitey could have NEVER set foot in Africa, dumbass.
You might want to go study this instead of posting idiocy.
I have. I am trying to understand what you use for logical reasoning.
You get black arabs.Words like “sub-Saharan Africa” are GOOD words to use if you are talking about white power and the world it has created (colonialism, racism, racialized identities, etc)Sub-Saharan Africa - Wikipedia
Nothing in this article suggests that South Africa is excluded from the designation.
How is a geographical designation racist? Sub-Saharan literally means below the Sahara Desert.
The UN uses the term to designate the region for statistical purposes. Is the UN racist?
But they are TERRIBLE terms to use, as tools of thought.
It draws a big fat line across Africa based on race. It makes the most diverse part of the world into undifferentiated blob.
Who the hell thinks up this shit?
- Are Italy and Greece “sub-Nordic” ?
- Are the U.S. and Mexico “sub-Canadian”?
- Is Latin America sub-Anglo-America?
Black folks are on both sides of the Sahara as well. There are millions of blacks who live all across the Sahara, as their ancestors have lived for thousands of years.
When whites use the terms “Sub Saharan” Africa they are mostly referring to stereotypical phenotypes associated with Black people. The fault with this reasoning is that there is no single Black phenotype in Africa.
Even within certain African ethnic groups there is genetic diversity which dictates hair textures and types, eye color, nose shape, skin tone, yet it's still Blackness.
Blacks live on both sides of the Sahara? On what planet?
North of the Sahara are Arabs, dumbass!
You dumb white bastard (and yes I had swear and insult to make the point)
That is because this person needs medical attention. The hatred has eroded away any semblence of humanity.You arent defending your claim very well. Repeating "slave owners are conservatives" over and over again isnt going to cut it. Do you have a real argument or not?if they have slaves they are conservatives dip s***. Actually the conservative black Africans love money so they sold slaves to the whites and their culture was destroyed then and by colonialism after....They are definitely not conservatives, but those Africans sure love to enslave people. I blame their inferior culture.Yep conservatives have screwed over minorities forever. Slave traders, colonists, you name it-and the conservative politicians and monarchies behind them. They destroyed the culture and then complain about it. And they are still screwing them over....Did dip shit skinpimp....
Sub-Saharan is a geographical term.
If it makes you feel any better the Australian tribes that fall into the general Aboriginal Gene pools were just a slow to develop.
Now if you want to deny the gene pool identity of people who lived for the past one thousand years below the latitude of the Sahara go right ahead.
Other than that why don't you stop wasting people's time with childish semantics that have more to do with puke politics and I do with real historical fact.
Jo
You get black arabs.Words like “sub-Saharan Africa” are GOOD words to use if you are talking about white power and the world it has created (colonialism, racism, racialized identities, etc)Sub-Saharan Africa - Wikipedia
Nothing in this article suggests that South Africa is excluded from the designation.
How is a geographical designation racist? Sub-Saharan literally means below the Sahara Desert.
The UN uses the term to designate the region for statistical purposes. Is the UN racist?
But they are TERRIBLE terms to use, as tools of thought.
It draws a big fat line across Africa based on race. It makes the most diverse part of the world into undifferentiated blob.
Who the hell thinks up this shit?
- Are Italy and Greece “sub-Nordic” ?
- Are the U.S. and Mexico “sub-Canadian”?
- Is Latin America sub-Anglo-America?
Black folks are on both sides of the Sahara as well. There are millions of blacks who live all across the Sahara, as their ancestors have lived for thousands of years.
When whites use the terms “Sub Saharan” Africa they are mostly referring to stereotypical phenotypes associated with Black people. The fault with this reasoning is that there is no single Black phenotype in Africa.
Even within certain African ethnic groups there is genetic diversity which dictates hair textures and types, eye color, nose shape, skin tone, yet it's still Blackness.
Blacks live on both sides of the Sahara? On what planet?
North of the Sahara are Arabs, dumbass!
You dumb white bastard (and yes I had swear and insult to make the point)
The :black Arabs are in the southern Sahara, you incredible twit! I have been there. Have you? and resulted from invasion over the past millennia.
I also taught world history off and on for 21 years. From what middle school did you get thrown out?
No, because Islam is a religion they can adopt. "Arab" is a RACE. Africans are not ArabThere can and there is.Black MUSLIMS exist. There can be no such thing as a black "Arab."Actually that is untrue. Plus black Arabs do exist.Blacks live on both sides of the Sahara? On what planet?
North of the Sahara are Arabs, dumbass!
Actually, quite a few Africans are Arabs. Arab migration into Northern Africa dates back thousands of years.
What is the impact of Colonialism on Africa today?
If blacks were so superior, whitey could have NEVER set foot in Africa, dumbass.
You might want to go study this instead of posting idiocy.
I have. I am trying to understand what you use for logical reasoning.
Apparently you have not or you would not be asking that question.
Why is it so fucking difficult for you and these other racist scumbags to accept the fact that Africa had just as much of a civilization as Europe. Why does it hurt you faggots so much to actually have to consider this?
They were far less advanced than the rest of the world.This thread has gone off the rails, predictably.
It started out with a discussion of pre-colonial African civilization.
There are several examples of technical empires prior to the colonial era.
What about those?
You mean fewer, not less.
Grammar exists for a reason.