Another Liberal False Narrative (LIE) Exposed

[ClosedCaption]

Lets try this again:

According to what source are you saying they lied?

{
A source with knowledge of the situation told CNN that Kushner could likely end up with a top national security clearance as a key adviser to his father-in-law, a position he is expected to take. The source said it is likely, but has not happened yet.
I am not trying to get "top level security clearance" for my children. This was a typically false news story.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2016}

Trump denies inquiry about security clearance for kids - CNNPolitics.com

CBS lied based on this. The first lie is "his children." Nothing in the "source" even claims that he sought clearance for his children, it ONLY mentions Kushner. CBS fabricated the rest out of whole cloth, as the leftist media tends to do.

Secondly, there is nothing even resembling confirmation of this supposed "source." The source may well have been the copy girl who was giving the CBS writer a blow job as he fabricated his story.

So your source is Trump?

We'll see wont we

Uh no, my source was CNN.

The lie CBS told was based on some "source" from CNN who never mentioned Trump's children, only Kushner.

CBS lied, again.

Read again. Your source is sourcing Trump who denied it. So your source is Trump.

We'll see wont we

Think.

The allegation from the unnamed source ONLY mentions Kushner.

CBS lied and got caught - yet again.

I asked you to prove it was a lie and you sourced Trump. Just like I thought you were doing. We'll see if its true or not

 

[Uncensored2008]

{
A source with knowledge of the situation told CNN that Kushner could likely end up with a top national security clearance as a key adviser to his father-in-law, a position he is expected to take. The source said it is likely, but has not happened yet.
I am not trying to get "top level security clearance" for my children. This was a typically false news story.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2016}

Trump denies inquiry about security clearance for kids - CNNPolitics.com

CBS lied based on this. The first lie is "his children." Nothing in the "source" even claims that he sought clearance for his children, it ONLY mentions Kushner. CBS fabricated the rest out of whole cloth, as the leftist media tends to do.

Secondly, there is nothing even resembling confirmation of this supposed "source." The source may well have been the copy girl who was giving the CBS writer a blow job as he fabricated his story.

So your source is Trump?

We'll see wont we

Uh no, my source was CNN.

The lie CBS told was based on some "source" from CNN who never mentioned Trump's children, only Kushner.

CBS lied, again.

Read again. Your source is sourcing Trump who denied it. So your source is Trump.

We'll see wont we

Think.

The allegation from the unnamed source ONLY mentions Kushner.

CBS lied and got caught - yet again.

I asked you to prove it was a lie and you sourced Trump. Just like I thought you were doing. We'll see if its true or not

You lack a functioning brain.

 

[jc456]

Here is the original source.

President-elect Donald Trump is potentially seeking top secret security clearances for his children, sources tell CBS News.

The Trump team has asked the White House to explore the possibility of getting his children the top secret security clearances. Logistically, the children would need to be designated by the current White House as national security advisers to their father to receive top secret clearances. However, once Mr. Trump becomes president, he would be able to put in the request himself.

Trump team seeks top-secret security clearances for Trump's children

Exploring the possibility is not asking for it.

Sneaky Groper Elect fools the rubes again. "I'm outraged I tells ya! Outraged"

Potentially!!!!!!! I love the deception of the left. Yeppers, POTENTIALLY or otherwise we have no fking clue. We just thought we'd give our base something to think is happening cause they are so gullible.

 

[jc456]

Here is the original source.

President-elect Donald Trump is potentially seeking top secret security clearances for his children, sources tell CBS News.

The Trump team has asked the White House to explore the possibility of getting his children the top secret security clearances. Logistically, the children would need to be designated by the current White House as national security advisers to their father to receive top secret clearances. However, once Mr. Trump becomes president, he would be able to put in the request himself.

Trump team seeks top-secret security clearances for Trump's children

Exploring the possibility is not asking for it.

Sneaky Groper Elect fools the rubes again. "I'm outraged I tells ya! Outraged"

But that's a lie.

Trump inquired about his son in law, who is not related to him.

Why do you on the left lie so much? Do you never learn?

According to what source?

All of them.

CBS lies. Trump had explored Jared Kushner attending presidential briefs, then decided against it. Never did Trump seek or inquire about his children getting clearances. CBS lied - it's what they do as part of the party media.

Lets try this again:

According to what source are you saying they lied?

no, no what source says he did. Where is this request at? oh btw.

 

[jc456]

So your source is Trump?

We'll see wont we

Uh no, my source was CNN.

The lie CBS told was based on some "source" from CNN who never mentioned Trump's children, only Kushner.

CBS lied, again.

Read again. Your source is sourcing Trump who denied it. So your source is Trump.

We'll see wont we

Think.

The allegation from the unnamed source ONLY mentions Kushner.

CBS lied and got caught - yet again.

I asked you to prove it was a lie and you sourced Trump. Just like I thought you were doing. We'll see if its true or not

You lack a functioning brain.

 

[jc456]

Here is the original source - CBS News.

CBS? One of the 'All-In' 'Butthurt' Media....

And now here's the truth:

"I am not trying to get "top level security clearance" for my children. This was a typically false news story.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2016"

Here maybe this will help clarify what they wrote.

The Trump team (not the Groper Elect himself) has asked the White House to explore the possibility (a simple how to question) of getting his children the top secret security clearances.

So in the next press conference I hope CBS asks the Groper Elect if someone asked.

The Groper Elect never reads beyond the Head lines does he?

Maybe CBS could ask the White House staffer who fielded the question to clarify what was said?

Except the Trump team didn't. They ONLY explored Jared Kushner - not Trumps children,

CBS lied, flat out and bald faced.

You were there?

You were?

 

[jc456]

Here is the original source.

President-elect Donald Trump is potentially seeking top secret security clearances for his children, sources tell CBS News.

The Trump team has asked the White House to explore the possibility of getting his children the top secret security clearances. Logistically, the children would need to be designated by the current White House as national security advisers to their father to receive top secret clearances. However, once Mr. Trump becomes president, he would be able to put in the request himself.

Trump team seeks top-secret security clearances for Trump's children

Exploring the possibility is not asking for it.

Sneaky Groper Elect fools the rubes again. "I'm outraged I tells ya! Outraged"

But that's a lie.

Trump inquired about his son in law, who is not related to him.

Why do you on the left lie so much? Do you never learn?

Are you outraged? Rubie.

I'm ecstatic, I think all of your gullible nature is as fking funny as anything I've ever seen.

 

[jc456]

It's unprecedented for a "child or family member" to receive security clearances, said Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer who has held that kind of security clearance and clerked for the National Security Archive

He added, "You can't hold a security clearance as an informal adviser — there is no such concept."

well thanks for the education, who is that for exactly? I mean Trump didn't ask, so who is your message for?

 

[Timmy]

Hold on. Since when is "son in law " not a relative ?

 

[BlindBoo]

Here is the original source - CBS News.

CBS? One of the 'All-In' 'Butthurt' Media....

And now here's the truth:

"I am not trying to get "top level security clearance" for my children. This was a typically false news story.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2016"

Here maybe this will help clarify what they wrote.

The Trump team (not the Groper Elect himself) has asked the White House to explore the possibility (a simple how to question) of getting his children the top secret security clearances.

So in the next press conference I hope CBS asks the Groper Elect if someone asked.

The Groper Elect never reads beyond the Head lines does he?

Maybe CBS could ask the White House staffer who fielded the question to clarify what was said?

Except the Trump team didn't. They ONLY explored Jared Kushner - not Trumps children,

CBS lied, flat out and bald faced.

You were there?

You were?

Never claimed I was. Never claimed The Groper Elect lied about it either. I claimed he doesn't read past the headlines.

I don't see anything inherently wrong with asking. They don't have much experience.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hold on. Since when is "son in law " not a relative ?

Related by marriage, not blood.

 

[francoHFW]

Actually, the lie that corruption existed is over, hater dupe.

 

[TheDude]

Surprise, Surprise (Ok, not really at all...)

"I am not trying to get "top level security clearance" for my children. This was a typically false news story.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2016"

But Libs on this board ate that shit up and could not post the lie fast enough.



Trump: I didn’t request security clearances for my kids - Hot Air

No such thing as a liberal narrative that's true.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Actually, the lie that corruption existed is over, hater dupe.

{
A separate document lists the presidential appointments that were doled out to donors. That list notes the highest bidder, Matthew Barzun, contributed $3.5 million to President Obama's first election in 2008, and subsequently received an appointment as America's ambassador to the United Kingdom and Sweden in August 2009.

Julius Genachowski, who donated a little more than $3.4 million, was appointed chairman of the Federal Communications Commission in June 2009. Frank Sanchez, who donated nearly the same amount, was awarded a position as undersecretary at the Commerce Department in 2010.

Of the top 57 donors, 18 received ambassadorships at Clinton's State Department. The cheapest, Bill Facho, paid a paltry $950,718 to serve as ambassador to Austria from 2009-13. The median price was about $1.5 million, and the four contributors closest to that range received appointments to South Africa, Belgium, Luxembourg, and New Zealand.}

Leaked papers appear to reveal Dem 'pay for play' scheme

You STUPID fucking lying retard.

Stop with the lies retard, you are not helping yourself or your corrupt party.