Another Leftist Responds to Joe’s Call for Violence and Shoots 84 Year Old Pro Life Woman

[CarlinAnnArbor]

"MAGA Republicans do not respect the Constitution. They do not believe in the rule of law. They do not recognize the will of the people

That's a damn lie and you know it. Leftists projecting again

 

[M14 Shooter]

And what exactly is "extreme"?

According to the President's press secretary:
"When you are not with where a majority of Americans are, then you know, that is extreme,”

White House says those not ‘in majority’ are ‘extreme’ - Washington Examiner

The White House previewed President Joe Biden’s prime-time address about threats to democracy ahead of the midterm elections with a defense of his definition of extremism.Biden is expected to argue that the wing of the Republican Party most closely associated with former President Donald Trump...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Currently, Biden has a 53% disapproval rate - thus, the 42% that approve of him are extremists.

How Popular Is Joe Biden?

Latest polls on President Joe Biden’s approval ratings

projects.fivethirtyeight.com

 

[BlindBoo]

And di so as a means to avoid addressing the issue at hand.
Thus, your defense of the shooter

There was no call for political violence by the president. That was a bald face lie. Mine was a defense of the presidents words, not the actions of the shooter or driver.

You an Hoss, just being typically nasty regardless of the party.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That there was no call for political violence by the president.

There you go, avoiding the issue again.
Thus, your defense of the shooter

 

[BlindBoo]

There you go, avoiding the issue again.
Thus, your defense of the shooter

My issue is that "Another Leftist Responds to Joe’s Call for Violence" is lie as the President did not call for violence.

You certainly provided no examples.

 

[marvin martian]

My issue is that "Another Leftist Responds to Joe’s Call for Violence" is lie as the President did not call for violence.

You certain provided no examples.

You've been radicalized to the point where the president calling half the country a "clear and present danger" doesn't even register with you as the dangerous hate speech it is.

 

[M14 Shooter]

My issue is...

... unrelated to the point put to you.
Thus, your defense of the shooter

 

[M14 Shooter]

You've been radicalized to the point where the president calling half the country a "clear and present danger" doesn't even register with you as the dangerous hate speech it is.

"Hate speech" only applies to speech from people he disagrees with.
The exact same words can fall from the mouth of a Democrat, and he's A-OK with it.

 

[BlindBoo]

... unrelated to the point put to you.
Thus, your defense of the shooter

You lie. Calling out the Neo-GOP lie about the president is not defending the violence they tried to attribute to the Presidents speech.

There is no other point I responded to.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You lie.

You defend a leftist loon who shot an 82yr old woman because he disagrees with her.

 

[bodecea]

They have started the war.

And....what are you going to do now? (anyone shooting someone, despite it being a 2nd Amendment solution, should be arrested, charged and punished)

 

[bodecea]

well he did just admit he was with a 12 year old girl when he was 30. Can't get much creepier than that.

He did no such thing....we can't help but notice how MAGAts like to let their imaginations run with such fantasies.

 

[easyt65]

Even at the height of the Democrats' violent rhetoric that inspired TWO attempted political assassinations - not to mention terrorist attacks that destroyed businesses, until parts of cities to the ground, and terrorist bombings of churches, women's clinics, and pro-life centers - I never thought I would see a President of the United States imitate Hitler, declare war on half of the citizens of this country to be 'enemies' and 'terrorists', thereby creating such division as to declare / create a civil war...

Biden and Democrats have done so.

 

[bodecea]

And war it is.

So...what's YOUR first move?

 

[BlindBoo]

You've been radicalized to the point where the president calling half the country a "clear and present danger" doesn't even register with you as the dangerous hate speech it is.

Where and when did he do that? Have you been conditioned to believe that, or are you just lying? Here's yer quote.

"Now, I want to be very clear — (applause) — very clear up front: Not every Republican, not even the majority of Republicans, are MAGA Republicans. Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology

So that's like 10% to 12% of the country, not even close to half.

 

[BlindBoo]

... unrelated to the point put to you.
Thus, your defense of the shooter

Specious lie.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Specious lie.

Nothing here changes the fact you defend a leftist loon who shot an 82yr old woman because he disagrees with her.

 

[BlindBoo]

"Hate speech" only applies to speech from people he disagrees with.
The exact same words can fall from the mouth of a Democrat, and he's A-OK with it.

These liars can't even quote a complete sentence from Good old Joe's speech. They have to splice and dice it to the flock because when they hear an entire quote in context, they go into a shocked stated of connotative dissonance.

 

[M14 Shooter]

These liars can't even quote a complete sentence from Good old Joe's speech.

Nothing here changes the fact you believe "Hate speech" only applies to speech from people you disagree with.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nothing here changes the fact you defend a leftist loon who shot an 82yr old woman because he disagrees with her.

You are a liar. Produce the quote where I defended him.