Another illegal Obama scheme exposed. DACA ruled unconstitutional.

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Did someone take your money?

Yes. I pay taxes.

The State of Texas has been pillaged by your pet brown slaves.

We need to send them to you.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Okee doakee.

And in the mean time...what do you say to someone who is like 28 who was brought here when they were 14 and has no family in Panama--where her parents were from?

Do they get to stay or do they have to go?

Execute them.

 

[Papageorgio]

Okee doakee.

And in the mean time...what do you say to someone who is like 28 who was brought here when they were 14 and has no family in Panama--where her parents were from?

Do they get to stay or do they have to go?

They can apply for legal citizenship, many thousands do that every year.

 

[Nostra]

Is there an immigration problem?

Yes

Do we have an open border?

No

It is wide open, Simp.

 

[candycorn]

They can apply for legal citizenship, many thousands do that every year.

Do you think they should be deported in the mean time--to a nation where they have never been as an adult-- and go to the "back of the line" as they used to say?

 

[Lesh]

Tell that to the 2,000,000+ who have come here illegally this year alone.
Oh, I forgot, they said the magic word "asylum" so they're not illegal, right Moonbat?

Hey moron...that's the LAW.

So you claim DACA must go because of the law...but asylum laws can be ignored?

 

[Lesh]

That's illegal, moron. The law specifically states that work permits shall not be issued to illegal aliens.



So? The law says they should be on a bus to Tijuana.

Really? Post a link to that law

 

[Catsnmeters]

President's don't just need to be 'reigned in' for intentionally violating the Constitution and Rule of Law because doing so is part of fetting their agenda advanced.

As pointed out, Barry declared he had no Consturutional authority to affect citizenship...right before he issued the DACA EO.

This should and will go down in history as a President intentionally violating the Constitution to push a leftist / Democrat agenda.

He shod have be (and still should be) CENSURED, at the least, for doing so...

...as Biden should be for violating the Constitution and Rule of Law for his failed, national security-threatening, nation-harming Open Border-illegal invasion policies and actions!

Yawn... another if dem rule is shot down they are unconstitutional and if a repub rule is shot down it's activist courts.

Same old right wing narrative in a different package.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Brown people scare you.

I get it.

Is there a reason brown people DON’T “scare you?
If you weren’t brown yourself would you be “scared” based on the data?

LAPD Most Wanted

www.lapdonline.org

 

[easyt65]

Yawn... another if dem rule is shot down they are unconstitutional and if a repub rule is shot down it's activist courts.

You DO know that even Barry admitted what he was about to do - his DACA EO - was Un-Constitutional, right?

 

[ColonelAngus]

No more DACA kids allowed. About time.

Biden scolds 'MAGA Republicans' after 5th Circuit Court strikes down DACA, orders no new applicants

Presiden Biden blamed Republicans in a statement after the Fifth Circuit Court determined the Obama administration lacked authority to implement the DACA program.

www.foxnews.com

We all knew it was. Thats why Obama did an EO instead of the Dems passing a fucking bill.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Another loss for the cult.

They consider circumventing the Constitution for their own goals to be a win.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You DO know that even Barry admitted what he was about to do - his DACA EO - was Un-Constitutional, right?

View attachment 706369

Of course you have a link for that claim?

 

[Polishprince]

DACA was created in a 2012 memorandum issued by former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The program does not grant legal immigration status to its beneficiaries, but it does protect them from deportation and allows them to apply for work permits and a Social Security number.

These protections and benefits are provided in two-year renewable intervals.

To qualify for DACA, a person must have arrived in the U.S. before their 16th birthday and before June 15, 2007. Immigrants are ineligible for the program if they have been convicted of a felony, a significant misdemeanor like domestic violence or sexual abuse, or three or more misdemeanor offenses. They also cannot be deemed a threat to national security or public safety.

All of that is well and fine. But it was never voted on by Congress.. Now that the Democrats have majority in both houses and a Far Left Presbo, why don't they put it to a vote?

Let the electorate know their stand on this, so they can get feedback from their bosses- The Beleaguered American Taxpayer.

 

[easyt65]

Of course you have a link for that claim?

Already posted it - his exact words and the link to it.

Post #28

Try to keep up.

 

[BlindBoo]

I knew it was unconstitutional the minute Obama created it.

Texas-based U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen last year declared DACA illegal. He found that the program had not been subjected to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.

Wednesday's ruling by three judges of the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit upholds the judge's initial finding. But it sends the case back to him for a look at a new version of the rule issued by the Biden administration in late August.

The new rule's 453 pages are largely technical and represent little substantive change from the 2012 memo that created DACA, but it was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process intended to improve its chances of surviving legal muster.

An appeals court rules against DACA, but the program continues — for now

The Fifth Circuit said a federal district judge in Texas should take another look at the program following the revisions adopted by the Biden administration, leaving the future of DACA up in the air.

www.npr.org

 

[bripat9643]

Texas-based U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen last year declared DACA illegal. He found that the program had not been subjected to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.

Wednesday's ruling by three judges of the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit upholds the judge's initial finding. But it sends the case back to him for a look at a new version of the rule issued by the Biden administration in late August.

The new rule's 453 pages are largely technical and represent little substantive change from the 2012 memo that created DACA, but it was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process intended to improve its chances of surviving legal muster.

An appeals court rules against DACA, but the program continues — for now

The Fifth Circuit said a federal district judge in Texas should take another look at the program following the revisions adopted by the Biden administration, leaving the future of DACA up in the air.

www.npr.org

It's still unconstitutional, moron. EOs cannot undo laws created by Congress.

End of story.

 

[BlindBoo]

It's still unconstitutional, moron. EOs cannot undo laws created by Congress.

End of story.

If it were that simple the court wouldn't have to find some administrative technically to call it illegal. That technically has been corrected which is why it was sent back to the original judge.

 

[Billiejeens]

Biden getting elected was a loss for the good guys

He wasn't elected.

 

[bripat9643]

If it were that simple the court wouldn't have to find some administrative technically to call it illegal. That technically has been corrected which is why it was sent back to the original judge.

It is that simple. The complication comes in when liberal judges are trying to justify overruling the Constitution.