Well, for those who are somewhat skeptical of CNN there is '
The Hill' published by Don Trump confidant and golfing partner, Jimmy Finklestein.
The Hill had this to report today:
"Former Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Durbin, for
seven hours on Saturday as part of the panel’s investigation into efforts by Trump allies to interfere in the 2020 election results.
He also spoke with the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general
for two hours on Friday, according to The New York Times.
Durbin said Rosen, who agreed to speak to the committee voluntarily, “told us a lot.”
He said the former official was “very open,” adding, “There’s a lot there, an awful lot there. You can imagine seven hours of testimony.”
Rosen told the inspector general's office about five encounters with Jeffrey Clark, who served as acting head of the DOJ's civil division under Trump. During one encounter, Clark admitted to meeting Trump and promised to not do so again, the Times reported.
Durbin, when asked by Bash what the most shocking part of Rosen’s testimony was, pointed to Trump’s direct involvement in the campaign to pressure officials to overturn the election results.
“Just how directly personally involved the president was, the pressure he was putting on Jeffrey Rosen. It was real, very real, and it was very specific,” Durbin said.
"To think that [former Attorney General ]Bill Barr left, resigned after he had announced he didn't see irregularities in the election, and then his replacement was under extraordinary pressure from the president of the United States, even to the point where they were talking about replacing him. ... That pressure was on," Durbin said at a separate point in the interview.
Durbin, when pressed by Bash, refused to offer additional details on the specific pressure Trump placed on Rosen.
He did, however, reveal that Trump asked his then-acting attorney general “to do certain things related to states' election returns,” which he refused to do.
...............................................................................................................................................................
What Rosen's testimony means for further investigations into the prior Administration? Hell, I dunno.
But, probably more than zero. Time will tell. No?
