Amityville killer dies of old age(?)

[Auld Phart]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

 

[WinterBorn]

Waste of 40 years of our tax dollars.

 

[Pogo]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

69 is "old age"?

Interesting, since the link makes no mention of "old age" at all and specifically says the cause of death wasn't known and/or wouldn't be released except to the family.

 

[Pogo]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

Waste of 40 years of our tax dollars.

Not sure why you guys think a convicted murderer should walk free. Do we have an Elba to exile him to?

 

[struth]

I believe he was found guilty of second-degree murder, not capital murder, so death was an option for the Court

 

[SassyIrishLass]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

69 is "old age"?

Interesting, since the link makes no mention of "old age" at all and specifically says the cause of death wasn't known.

Missed the question mark didn't ya

 

[percysunshine]

The book and movie royalties ended up some where.

 

[Auld Phart]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

Waste of 40 years of our tax dollars.

Not sure why you guys think a convicted murderer should walk free. Do we have an Elba to exile him to?

Not sure why you guys think a convicted murderer should walk free.

Who said anything about him being able to walk?

 

[Cecilie1200]

The book and movie royalties ended up some where.

Most likely to the author, the publishing company, and the movie company.

 

[Burgermeister]

The guy who was married to Barbara Streisand?

 

[Pogo]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

69 is "old age"?

Interesting, since the link makes no mention of "old age" at all and specifically says the cause of death wasn't known.

Missed the question mark didn't ya

Nape. I'm questioning where the OP got the idea of "old age" when nothing in his link, including his listed age, suggests it.

 

[Pogo]

'Amityville Horror' killer dies in prison at 69 (yahoo.com)

Killed his family in 1974

Finally died, after serving 45 years.

at least 40 years too many.

Waste of 40 years of our tax dollars.

Not sure why you guys think a convicted murderer should walk free. Do we have an Elba to exile him to?

Not sure why you guys think a convicted murderer should walk free.

Who said anything about him being able to walk?

Logical deduction. You said "40 years too many", the other poster said "waste of 40 years of our tax dollars".

Both "tax dollars" and "40 years too many" must refer to the costs and term of prison, must it not?

Without that prison, he's walking free.

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

 

[Pogo]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's job.

 

[Pogo]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

 

[Pogo]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

So you can't explain how it's not a double standard. Just "reasons"?

And then you want to dig to a deeper level with ad hom and Appeal to Eemotion? Not to mention rotating euphemisms?

Oh do go on, please. I like watching demolition derbies.

But yanno what, as far as "doing what needs to be done" ---- that's exactly what I just did.

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

So you can't explain how it's not a double standard. Just "reasons"?

And then you want to dig to a deeper level with ad hom on top?

Oh do go on, please.

no need to go on.


You've made your point.

you don't know the difference between murder, and court ordered execution.

 

[Pogo]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

So you can't explain how it's not a double standard. Just "reasons"?

And then you want to dig to a deeper level with ad hom and Appeal to Emotion? Not to mention rotating euphemisms?

Oh do go on, please.


But yanno what, as far as "doing what needs to be done" ---- that's exactly what I just did.

no need to go on.


You've made your point.

you don't know the difference between murder, and court ordered execution.

Oh yes I know all about euphemisms. Already mentioned that.
Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

If he did not, aren't they still alive?

Can you grok the irony of the State punishing murder via murder? Or is that beyond your pay grade?

Let's dilute it to a simple yes/no question. Here it is.

--- Is murder wrong?