Amityville killer dies of old age(?)

[Cecilie1200]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

In New York? Not especially likely.

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

So you can't explain how it's not a double standard. Just "reasons"?

And then you want to dig to a deeper level with ad hom and Appeal to Emotion? Not to mention rotating euphemisms?

Oh do go on, please.


But yanno what, as far as "doing what needs to be done" ---- that's exactly what I just did.

no need to go on.


You've made your point.

you don't know the difference between murder, and court ordered execution.

Oh yes I know all about euphemisms. Already mentioned that.
Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

If he did not, aren't they still alive?

Can you grok the irony of the State punishing murder via murder? Or is that beyond your pay grade?

Let's dilute it to a simple yes/no question. Here it is.

--- Is murder wrong?

Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

No, he murdered them.

He allowed them no trial, he made the decision, and took their lives by himself.

Execution is a decision made by a jury of 12 of his peers, after the pros and cons of his crime have been examined, and announced by a judge.

--- Is murder wrong?

Murder, yes.

Execution, as determined above, is not.

shame you can't see the difference.

 

[DudleySmith]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

If Cuomo kills the elderly, he's all for it.

 

[Genclebune]

Rip he was possessed

 

[Pogo]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

So you can't explain how it's not a double standard. Just "reasons"?

And then you want to dig to a deeper level with ad hom and Appeal to Emotion? Not to mention rotating euphemisms?

Oh do go on, please.


But yanno what, as far as "doing what needs to be done" ---- that's exactly what I just did.

no need to go on.


You've made your point.

you don't know the difference between murder, and court ordered execution.

Oh yes I know all about euphemisms. Already mentioned that.
Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

If he did not, aren't they still alive?

Can you grok the irony of the State punishing murder via murder? Or is that beyond your pay grade?

Let's dilute it to a simple yes/no question. Here it is.

--- Is murder wrong?

Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

No, he murdered them.

He allowed them no trial, he made the decision, and took their lives by himself.

Execution is a decision made by a jury of 12 of his peers, after the pros and cons of his crime have been examined, and announced by a judge.

--- Is murder wrong?

Murder, yes.

Execution, as determined above, is not.

shame you can't see the difference.

You are correct, I can't see the difference.

Murder: an entity makes the conscious decision to end some human's life.
Execution: an entity makes the conscious decision to end some human's life.

Nope, not seeing it.

Shame you can't see the double standard.
Even shamer that you can see it but can't admit it.

Murder is either wrong or not wrong. You chose that it's wrong, and we agree.

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

In New York? Not especially likely.

In New York? Not especially likely.

Which is why I'll never live in NY.

They prefer to coddle criminals.

Same with Wisconsin.

Gave Dahmer enough life sentences to choke a goat, only to be killed by a fellow inmate that should have been executed long before Dahmer was arrested.

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

 

[Auld Phart]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

no 'double standard'.

He gave up his right to life when he killed his family.

The 'state' failed to do it's [sic] job.

And what "job" was that? Prison? No, it did that. Trial and conviction? Nope, did that too.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

What's left?

Murder?

That thing individual citizens are not allowed to do? That one?

Care to explain how the State can declare "you can't do X but we can", yet it's "no double standard"?
But of course I already asked this, didn't I.

no

Execution.


sorry you're too much of a wimp to do what needs to be done.

So you can't explain how it's not a double standard. Just "reasons"?

And then you want to dig to a deeper level with ad hom and Appeal to Emotion? Not to mention rotating euphemisms?

Oh do go on, please.


But yanno what, as far as "doing what needs to be done" ---- that's exactly what I just did.

no need to go on.


You've made your point.

you don't know the difference between murder, and court ordered execution.

Oh yes I know all about euphemisms. Already mentioned that.
Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

If he did not, aren't they still alive?

Can you grok the irony of the State punishing murder via murder? Or is that beyond your pay grade?

Let's dilute it to a simple yes/no question. Here it is.

--- Is murder wrong?

Did DeFeo not "execute" his victims?

No, he murdered them.

He allowed them no trial, he made the decision, and took their lives by himself.

Execution is a decision made by a jury of 12 of his peers, after the pros and cons of his crime have been examined, and announced by a judge.

--- Is murder wrong?

Murder, yes.

Execution, as determined above, is not.

shame you can't see the difference.

You are correct, I can't see the difference.

Murder: an entity makes the conscious decision to end some human's life.
Execution: an entity makes the conscious decision to end some human's life.

Nope, not seeing it.

Shame you can't see the double standard.
Even shamer that you can see it but can't admit it.

Murder is either wrong or not wrong. You chose that it's wrong, and we agree.

Murder is either wrong or not wrong. You chose that it's wrong, and we agree.

nope, I said murder was wrong.

Execution is not.

pathetic you can't see the difference.

 

[Auld Phart]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

 

[TNHarley]

Read my lips: DEATH PENALTY

AH.

So you believe the State can declare murder illegal, yet can do so itself.

Interesting double standard. Where'd you buy it?

are you talking about taxes, or the death penalty?

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

 

[Auld Phart]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

 

[Auld Phart]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

So he didn't kill them but he did murder them. Gets curiouser and curiouser.

Whether he killed, executed or murdered them, did he cause them to stop living?

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

So he didn't kill them but he did murder them. Gets curiouser and curiouser.

Whether he killed, executed or murdered them, did he cause them to stop living?

Whelp ---- guess the jury's out on that one, so to speak.
The judges have reached their decision: Double Standard. The assessment remains uncontested.

But no, not "Hangman". What do I look like, an insurrectionista?

 

[Auld Phart]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

So he didn't kill them but he did murder them. Gets curiouser and curiouser.

Whether he killed, executed or murdered them, did he cause them to stop living?

Whelp ---- guess the jury's out on that one, so to speak.
The judges have reached their decision: Double Standard. The assessment remains uncontested.

But no, not "Hangman". What do I look like, an insurrectionista?

no, you look like an asshole playing silly word games.

you received no answer, because I tired of your bullshit.

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

So he didn't kill them but he did murder them. Gets curiouser and curiouser.

Whether he killed, executed or murdered them, did he cause them to stop living?

Whelp ---- guess the jury's out on that one, so to speak.
The judges have reached their decision: Double Standard. The assessment remains uncontested.

But no, not "Hangman". What do I look like, an insurrectionista?

no, you look like an asshole playing silly word games.

you received no answer, because I tired of your bullshit.

You didn't answer because I set a trap for you and you knew it.

 

[Auld Phart]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

So he didn't kill them but he did murder them. Gets curiouser and curiouser.

Whether he killed, executed or murdered them, did he cause them to stop living?

Whelp ---- guess the jury's out on that one, so to speak.
The judges have reached their decision: Double Standard. The assessment remains uncontested.

But no, not "Hangman". What do I look like, an insurrectionista?

no, you look like an asshole playing silly word games.

you received no answer, because I tired of your bullshit.

You didn't answer because I set a trap for you and you knew it.

By playing silly word games.

Come back when you grow up.

 

[Pogo]

No, he murdered them.

You chose "No". You're saying he did NOT execute them.
So there's no murder, and he shouldn't have been in prison.

Now I get what y'all mean by 40 years of prison wasted.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

If he didn't, they must be still alive. Or were at the time. Were they?

I just wanna see how you're gonna squirm out of this. Good luck.

Whelp, you said "no" to the question of whether DeFeo executed his victims.

He didn't 'execute' them, he murdered them.

pathetic you don't know the difference.

And you just did it again.

He DIDN'T execute them, and yet somehow he DID murder them.

PICK ONE.

Did he "kill" them?

He murdered them.

any other word games you want to play?

Like, Hangman?

So he didn't kill them but he did murder them. Gets curiouser and curiouser.

Whether he killed, executed or murdered them, did he cause them to stop living?

Whelp ---- guess the jury's out on that one, so to speak.
The judges have reached their decision: Double Standard. The assessment remains uncontested.

But no, not "Hangman". What do I look like, an insurrectionista?

no, you look like an asshole playing silly word games.

you received no answer, because I tired of your bullshit.

You didn't answer because I set a trap for you and you knew it.

By playing silly word games.

Come back when you grow up.

uh --- I'm not in a position to "come back". I'm the one with the unanswered question. I just waits.