Americans Are Just Better Human Beings

[PoliticalChic]

Which god?

The God.....that requires a capital 'G' rather than the pagan forms you worship.....that our Founders relied on.

The Constitution provides for an observance of the Sabbath in its Presentment Clause, mandating that the President has ten days, excluding Sundays, to veto a bill lest it become binding.

And the instrument was framed with a view to the Declaration, which unequivocally bestows gratitude on the God of the Bible for America's independence.



1. The most quoted source was the Bible. Established in the original writings of our Founding Fathers we find that they discovered in Isaiah 33:22 the three branches of government: Isaiah 33:22 “For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us.” Here we see the judicial, the legislative and the executive branches. In Ezra 7:24 we see where they established the tax exempt status of the church: Ezra 7:24 “Also we certify you, that touching any of the priests and Levites, singers, porters, Nethinims, or ministers of this house of God, it shall not be lawful to impose toll, tribute, or custom, upon them.”

When we look at our Constitution we see in Article 4 Section 4 that we are guaranteed a Republican form of government, that was found in Exodus 18 “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens:” This indicates that we are to choose, or elect God fearing men and women. Looking at Article 3 Section 3 we see almost word for word Deuteronomy 17:6: ‘No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses. . .’ Deuteronomy 17:6 “At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses. . .”. The next paragraph in Article 3 Section 3 refers to who should pay the price for treason. In England, they could punish the sons for the trespasses of the father, if the father died.
Roger Anghis -- Bring America Back To Her Religious Roots, Part 7



Bet you don't know that the Constitution references Jesus Christ.

If you were an American, you might understand this.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Stop projecting. View attachment 641236 View attachment 641237

The Nazis were socialist.....as are you.

There is not one Nazi doctrine that Democrats eschew....including concentration camps for their citizens.


Soooo.....do you prefer 'Sieg Heil'....do you answer the phone with that phrase?

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Which god?

There is only 1 God & He can be known through the study of His word as recorded in the Bible. The rest is just demons & delusions.
Maybe some day you will open your eyes to truth & I pray you do but He gives us free will to either accept or reject him.
"The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt; their acts are vile. There is no one who does good."
Psalm 14:1

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. And the American belief is far better than anywhere else......especially Canada.



Here’s a Canadian writing for Quora, praising the stifling of freedom:

“Why do Canadians struggle with the concept of freedom, liberty, and the pursuit of one's own destiny? Why do they expect the nanny state to provide them with everything?

Only an American could ask this, and a Canadian could easily reply back: Why don’t Americans comprehend the idea of the larger public interest, and view liberty as something self confined?.... Australians and Canadians view liberty differently than Americans,…

Americans struggle with the truth that freedom is a two way street—that there are responsibilities accompanying freedom as well. For Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders, this represents an adolescent and sophomoric understanding of liberty at best. Some Canadians have summarised this sentiment in terms of we vs me society, but I think this obscures the following: Canada respects and safeguards personal freedom as much as the USA, but ascertains that infringing upon the rights of others is an affront to personal liberty, too.

Since Americans generally have difficulties understanding the subtleties of political philosophy by virtue of the arrested political development of the USA, it’s no wonder that they struggle with understanding liberty.” https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Canadi...ide-them-with-everything/answer/John-Mcewen-8




6. Let’s check:

"Think Canada Allows Freedom of Speech? Think Again

This societal need to prosecute potty mouths and anything deemed offensive has become a popular trend in Canada. Most recently this has been transcended into anti-bullying laws introduced in legislatures all over the country. We have to be careful about legislating offensiveness. We cannot allow the government to decide what subjective comments are acceptable and which should land you in prison.

.On December 12, Lord Dear introduced a motion to reform section 5 from the Public Order Act 1986 in the British House of Lords. Section 5 says that a person is guilty of an offence in Britain if he "uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby."

Essentially, it makes it illegal to insult anyone.

Reform Section 5, a campaign dedicated to removing the illegality of "insulting words or behaviour" from the law, has gotten a lot of attention in Britain with their slogan "Feel Free to Insult Me." They launched their mission after a man was arrested for asking a police officer, "do you realize your horse is gay?" A horse. While the officer himself admitted to not being insulted, he stated that the comment could have insulted anyone in the vicinity who heard it. Makes sense, right?

A teenager was later arrested for growling and woofing at two Labrador dogs in public, a café owner was investigated for showing biblical passages on a TV screen, and an LGBT group was arrested under section 5 for protesting anti-gay persecution in the Middle East. While one would hope such a law would only be used in extraordinary circumstances, it's actually very common."
Think Canada Allows Freedom of Speech? Think Again




Of course....if left up to our Nazis.....the Democrats:

Biden administration defends disinformation board from fierce GOP ...edition.cnn.com› 2022 › 05 › 02 › politics › dhs-disinformation-board › index.html

3 days ago - She is fluent in Russian, and her ... Russian disinformation. Despite her expertise, critics argue she's biased against claims of Democrats' misdeeds, former President Donald Trump's record, Covid-19 measures and free speech, among other issues. In a TikTok video posted prior to her appointment to lead the board, for example, ...

 

[sartre play]

Contrary to Obama's misstatemnt of American exceptionalism, we are simply a higher level of human development than any other nation.



1.In support of that judgment, one need be reminded that there is a full spectrum, not just ‘the other end,’ meaning Nazis, Bolsheviks, Maoists, and all sorts of savages.
It is important to carefully consider those nationalities that at first glance appear to be….similar….to America. But aren’t.

Oppression and genocide left out of the calculation….the view of human rights becomes central.



2. Our nation sprang from the loins of our closest relative, Britain…..but there are dramatic differences when one considers what Americans consider unalienable rights.

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

Rights belong to each human individually.

Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others. (So much for 'abortion rights.')

• To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.
• 
  For Americans, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.

3. First, Europe and England threats over free speech:​

​

"EU And UK Warn Musk Over Free Speech: "Elon, There Are ...​

https://www.iflscience.com › policy › eu-and-uk-warn-...
— The EU and UK have released warnings to Elon Musk over his goals of transforming Twitter into a platform for free speech.



UK Govt Vows to Jail Elon Musk if He Allows Free Speech on Twitter ...newspunch.com › home › uk govt vows to jail elon musk if he allows free speech on twitter
1 week ago - UK Govt Vows to Jail Elon Musk if He Allows Free Speech on Twitter Fact checked April 27, 2022 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, UK 15 Comments The UK government on Tuesday threatened to block Twitter and jail its new owner Elon Musk if he allows free speech on his platform.



UK Govt Threatens to Ban Twitter, Potentially Jail Elon Musk If ...americanfaith.com › home › uk govt threatens to ban twitter, potentially jail elon musk if he allows free speech
1 week ago - The UK on Tuesday threatened to ban Twitter altogether and potentially jail Elon Musk if he violates their incoming “Online Safety Bill” by allowing free speech on his platform. The move came just hours after the EU threatened to ban Twitter entirely if Musk allows free speech on the platform ...



Now….how about the nation with which we share a continent?

Nope….not up to America’s level.

Next post.

Not true. where you live does not make you a better or worse person. That makes zero sense.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not true. where you live does not make you a better or worse person. That makes zero sense.

Has anyone ever pointed out to you that reading only the title does not make you competent to off your (stupid) opinion?

Everything I post is supported, contrary to dopes who can do no better than "Is not, isssssssssss noooooooottttttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you can offer more intelligence, and education.

Or not.

 

[sartre play]

Insulting people as a reply to there opinion on the subject, What does that say about you as a American human being?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Insulting people as a reply to there opinion on the subject, What does that say about you as a American human being?

I demand more that the drivel you posted.


Here's the OP, find any flaw.


Post like an adult, not a third-grader.





1.In support of that judgment, one need be reminded that there is a full spectrum, not just ‘the other end,’ meaning Nazis, Bolsheviks, Maoists, and all sorts of savages.

It is important to carefully consider those nationalities that at first glance appear to be….similar….to America. But aren’t.



Oppression and genocide left out of the calculation….the view of human rights becomes central.







2. Our nation sprang from the loins of our closest relative, Britain…..but there are dramatic differences when one considers what Americans consider unalienable rights.



Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.



Human beings are the only entities that have rights.



Rights belong to each human individually.



Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.



Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.



Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others. (So much for 'abortion rights.')

• To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.
• 
  For Americans, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.

3. First, Europe and England threats over free speech:



"EU And UK Warn Musk Over Free Speech: "Elon, There Are ...

https://www.iflscience.com › policy › eu-and-uk-warn-...
— The EU and UK have released warnings to Elon Musk over his goals of transforming Twitter into a platform for free speech.




UK Govt Vows to Jail Elon Musk if He Allows Free Speech on Twitter ...newspunch.com › home › uk govt vows to jail elon musk if he allows free speech on twitter

1 week ago - UK Govt Vows to Jail Elon Musk if He Allows Free Speech on Twitter Fact checked April 27, 2022 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, UK 15 Comments The UK government on Tuesday threatened to block Twitter and jail its new owner Elon Musk if he allows free speech on his platform.



UK Govt Threatens to Ban Twitter, Potentially Jail Elon Musk If ...americanfaith.com › home › uk govt threatens to ban twitter, potentially jail elon musk if he allows free speech

1 week ago - The UK on Tuesday threatened to ban Twitter altogether and potentially jail Elon Musk if he violates their incoming “Online Safety Bill” by allowing free speech on his platform. The move came just hours after the EU threatened to ban Twitter entirely if Musk allows free speech on the platform ...







Now….how about the nation with which we share a continent?



Nope….not up to America’s level.

 

[bodecea]

The God.....that requires a capital 'G' rather than the pagan forms you worship.....that our Founders relied on.

The Constitution provides for an observance of the Sabbath in its Presentment Clause, mandating that the President has ten days, excluding Sundays, to veto a bill lest it become binding.

And the instrument was framed with a view to the Declaration, which unequivocally bestows gratitude on the God of the Bible for America's independence.



1. The most quoted source was the Bible. Established in the original writings of our Founding Fathers we find that they discovered in Isaiah 33:22 the three branches of government: Isaiah 33:22 “For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us.” Here we see the judicial, the legislative and the executive branches. In Ezra 7:24 we see where they established the tax exempt status of the church: Ezra 7:24 “Also we certify you, that touching any of the priests and Levites, singers, porters, Nethinims, or ministers of this house of God, it shall not be lawful to impose toll, tribute, or custom, upon them.”

When we look at our Constitution we see in Article 4 Section 4 that we are guaranteed a Republican form of government, that was found in Exodus 18 “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens:” This indicates that we are to choose, or elect God fearing men and women. Looking at Article 3 Section 3 we see almost word for word Deuteronomy 17:6: ‘No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses. . .’ Deuteronomy 17:6 “At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses. . .”. The next paragraph in Article 3 Section 3 refers to who should pay the price for treason. In England, they could punish the sons for the trespasses of the father, if the father died.
Roger Anghis -- Bring America Back To Her Religious Roots, Part 7



Bet you don't know that the Constitution references Jesus Christ.

If you were an American, you might understand this.

Nope....there's more than one god.............and goddess worshipped....this is NOT a theocracy (at least not yet). We don't need another Massachusetts Bay Colony killing people that don't worship exactly the way they are ordered to.

 

[bodecea]

The Nazis were socialist.....as are you.

There is not one Nazi doctrine that Democrats eschew....including concentration camps for their citizens.


Soooo.....do you prefer 'Sieg Heil'....do you answer the phone with that phrase?

The NAZIs were fascists who threw the Socialists in the con-centration camps first of all. You aren't up on any real factual history, are you? I'm not surprised.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nope....there's more than one god.............and goddess worshipped....this is NOT a theocracy (at least not yet). We don't need another Massachusetts Bay Colony killing people that don't worship exactly the way they are ordered to.

By 'god' you mean Obama.....you called him god, Jesus and the messiah.....


How'd that work out?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The NAZIs were fascists who threw the Socialists in the con-centration camps first of all. You aren't up on any real factual history, are you? I'm not surprised.

Nazis and Bolsheviks both took their doctrines from Karl Marx.
Just like you Democrats.


Here's today's lesson:


Nazism, communism, socialism....
1. Which comes from the works of Karl Marx
2. Which is a form of command and control big govenment
3. Which uses genocide on its political enemies
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual
5. Which oppresses and slaughters its own citizens


All three



1. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.

2. Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.




In a letter written on March 19, 1944, Ayn Rand remarked: “Fascism, Nazism, Communism and Socialism are only superficial variations of the same monstrous theme—collectivism.” Rand would later expand on this insight in various articles, most notably in two of her lectures at the Ford Hall Forum in Boston: “The Fascist New Frontier” (Dec. 16, 1962, published as a booklet by the Nathaniel Branden Institute in 1963); and “The New Fascism: Rule by Consensus” (April 18, 1965, published as Chapter 20 in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal [CUI] by New American Library in 1967).


As Rand put it in “Conservativism: An Obituary” (CUI, Chapter 19)





Are you really this uneducated???????

 

[Chillicothe]

There is only 1 God & He can be known through the study of His word as recorded in the Bible.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"in the Bible"?
Well, I dunno about that.
That god in the bible sure seems like a harsh guy (gal?)
Why didn't you deserve a god that was sort of a facilitator, a helper, someone who gave you a boost to be more successful? Helped you be happier, and less grievance-ridden?

You know, I read that bible, too.
I get speedbumped at Deuteronomy....and some passages in other books too.
Your god gets really really judgmental.
In truth, he doesn't sound very forgiving of less than stellar children (tho he/she makes no mention of poor parenting)

For example, if your kid drinks a wee bit, your god suggests this: (Deuteronomy 21:20)

"Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; 20And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. 21And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die:"
(that oughta stop the drinkin')

And that's just a tippler of a son. What about little Emily --the apple of Granma's eye --- who got a crush on the cute neighborhood boy? --- Taddy with the cowlick. And they got frisky up in the hayloft after a couple of swigs of hard-cider?

Well, your god, good poster JohnGalt orders you to do this to poor Emily:

"she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done an outrageous thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father’s house."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So there you are good poster ....and not-so-good father.......you got two of your beloved kids, that first-born son who was good at track & math; and little Emily who everybody liked being around (including that kid with the cowlick).....well anyway, there they both are, dead as a doornail, each lying under a pile of rocks.

Maybe, poster JohnGalt, you could shop around ....like some do for doctors or judges ....and find a god that would help you raise better kids, rather than being so harsh when you've failed in your parenting skills.

Just sayin'.

 

[Godboy]

That's just another difference between us. I don't need anything other than common sense to know I would never surrender my natural God given rights no matter what collectivists say.
Apparently, you would require some authority figure to write them down & tell you it's OK.
I'm a free man & if you want to infringe, you better be prepared for pushback, up to & including violence.
You're a sheep ready to do whatever someone tells you
Good luck with that

Its sounds like youre just making up these "rights from god".

 

[alang1216]

Time and again I am forced to educate you.
But.....noblesse oblige.....


From England, via the Magna Carta, we find a celebration of inalienable rights.


The most important word in the Declaration of Independence is found here:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, …”

Who get to decide what makes me happy and is therefore a right? God, the gov't, you, or me?

 

[PoliticalChic]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"in the Bible"?
Well, I dunno about that.
That god in the bible sure seems like a harsh guy (gal?)
Why didn't you deserve a god that was sort of a facilitator, a helper, someone who gave you a boost to be more successful? Helped you be happier, and less grievance-ridden?

You know, I read that bible, too.
I get speedbumped at Deuteronomy....and some passages in other books too.
Your god gets really really judgmental.
In truth, he doesn't sound very forgiving of less than stellar children (tho he/she makes no mention of poor parenting)

For example, if your kid drinks a wee bit, your god suggests this: (Deuteronomy 21:20)

"Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; 20And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. 21And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die:"
(that oughta stop the drinkin')

And that's just a tippler of a son. What about little Emily --the apple of Granma's eye --- who got a crush on the cute neighborhood boy? --- Taddy with the cowlick. And they got frisky up in the hayloft after a couple of swigs of hard-cider?

Well, your god, good poster JohnGalt orders you to do this to poor Emily:

"she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done an outrageous thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father’s house."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So there you are good poster ....and not-so-good father.......you got two of your beloved kids, that first-born son who was good at track & math; and little Emily who everybody liked being around (including that kid with the cowlick).....well anyway, there they both are, dead as a doornail, each lying under a pile of rocks.

Maybe, poster JohnGalt, you could shop around ....like some do for doctors or judges ....and find a god that would help you raise better kids, rather than being so harsh when you've failed in your parenting skills.

Just sayin'.

Wow......



The nerve of any Democrat to mention 'parenting.'

And the blame must be shared with the Democrats/Liberals have caused this, largely by
a. abandoning marriage and normalizing out of wedlock births
b. removing punishments for lawlessness as though all black Americans are criminals.
c. never criticizing the psychopathologies that too many black youth mirror.
d. demanding that thugs and criminals be kept in government school.
e. lying about police and whites in general.




Democrats....they use words, but don't know what they mean.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"in the Bible"?
Well, I dunno about that.
That god in the bible sure seems like a harsh guy (gal?)
Why didn't you deserve a god that was sort of a facilitator, a helper, someone who gave you a boost to be more successful? Helped you be happier, and less grievance-ridden?

You know, I read that bible, too.
I get speedbumped at Deuteronomy....and some passages in other books too.
Your god gets really really judgmental.
In truth, he doesn't sound very forgiving of less than stellar children (tho he/she makes no mention of poor parenting)

For example, if your kid drinks a wee bit, your god suggests this: (Deuteronomy 21:20)

"Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; 20And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. 21And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die:"
(that oughta stop the drinkin')

And that's just a tippler of a son. What about little Emily --the apple of Granma's eye --- who got a crush on the cute neighborhood boy? --- Taddy with the cowlick. And they got frisky up in the hayloft after a couple of swigs of hard-cider?

Well, your god, good poster JohnGalt orders you to do this to poor Emily:

"she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done an outrageous thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father’s house."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So there you are good poster ....and not-so-good father.......you got two of your beloved kids, that first-born son who was good at track & math; and little Emily who everybody liked being around (including that kid with the cowlick).....well anyway, there they both are, dead as a doornail, each lying under a pile of rocks.

Maybe, poster JohnGalt, you could shop around ....like some do for doctors or judges ....and find a god that would help you raise better kids, rather than being so harsh when you've failed in your parenting skills.

Just sayin'.

Isn't this just a late stage "abortion" for you lefties?
You're wasting your time if you think I'm going to read your entire delusional drivel, obfuscations & deliberate strawman arguments to drag the argument completely out of context.
Like my original point said, I have God given natural rights that no man can drag asunder.
You could try but I'd defend myself against any tyranny you would attempt to impose.
It's pretty simple so does anymore need to be said?

 

[Chillicothe]

"The nerve of any Democrat to mention 'parenting.'

Aw, that is a sad misread, poster Chic.
Neither my avatar...nor me....is a democrat.
They don't want us.
Neither do the Republicans.
(Tho, we do go to the luncheon-speak each party hosts in my city. The food is good (and cheap) and ofttimes the speaker is really interesting.)
So there is that.


But, more germane to your faithfulness to the Biblical:

Good poster Chic, are you now claiming that kids should not be stoned to death for drinkin' too much & too often?
Or doing the hanky-panky with the neighborhood dreamboat?

If that is what you are alleging....well, that doesn't sound very 'biblical' of you.

Do you think your bible is really just a restaurant menu?
Where you get to choose what you want, and walk away from that which makes you uneasy?

You do know the wags long ago called Christianist such as who do that....'Cafeteria Christians'?

You ain't one of those types are you, Chic?

 

[Chillicothe]

Like my original point said, I have God given natural rights that no man can drag asunder. You could try but I'd defend myself against any tyranny you would attempt to impose.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Well, let's just put aside for the sake of this discussion your fantagasm that my poor avatar, or anyone else's, for that matter.....is all that tyrannical towards you. Or intends to be. That just seems a tad paranoid, imho. So let's not go there.

More importantly good poster JohnGalt, I regret if my avatar wasn't being clear (nor were other posters who brought up the same point to you.)

But, if you recall, you were asked --words to the effect:

• Who exactly is this god that you gave you these so-called 'god-given rights'?
• And how...exactly....do you know he (she?) gave 'em to you?

You got any vetting, any link, any sourcing......that you deserved, earned, or were even awarded these so called 'god-given rights'?

You do see, don't you......that some here could perceive that you are simply making this stuff up as some sort of self-justification for acting badly, or selfishly, or thoughtlessly towards others.....and then calling it your "right" to do such? No?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Aw, that is a sad misread, poster Chic.
Neither my avatar...nor me....is a democrat.
They don't want us.
Neither do the Republicans.
(Tho, we do go to the luncheon-speak each party hosts in my city. The food is good (and cheap) and ofttimes the speaker is really interesting.)
So there is that.


But, more germane to your faithfulness to the Biblical:

Good poster Chic, are you now claiming that kids should not be stoned to death for drinkin' too much & too often?
Or doing the hanky-panky with the neighborhood dreamboat?

If that is what you are alleging....well, that doesn't sound very 'biblical' of you.

Do you think your bible is really just a restaurant menu?
Where you get to choose what you want, and walk away from that which makes you uneasy?

You do know the wags long ago called Christianist such as who do that....'Cafeteria Christians'?

You ain't one of those types are you, Chic?

Who'd you vote for?