Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,442
- 9,984
- 950
Actually; it’s nothing like that...Not really. If killing invaders is a principled decision. It’s just as righteous for us to do, as it is them.I don’t think very many people are outraged at this guy getting killed for taking a foolish risk. What I do find interesting is the lengths many posters have gone to to justify this killing, under the pretense of defending their borders, nation, island, culture, whatever... Yet here at home they get all squeamish at the prospect of doing the same. It shows a lack of principled application of morality...Someone needs to go over there and read them their Miranda Rights and then arrest them.
Seriously, this isn't our country, this isn't our island. We or any other country have no laws governing
this island. It is barbaric and has been for centuries, enter at your own risk......illegally.
This missionary knew the risks and was concerned, but he went anyways, and he got tribal justice.
If people really are outraged in the treatment a person, show the outrage toward No Ko, and China.
There are plenty of humanitarian rights being broken in those two countries alone that are against
their own laws.
We're the most powerful country in the world, with a history of allowing immigrants. They have zero power, with a history of shooting visitors full of arrows. We have a 200 year history. Theirs dates back 60,000 years. It's like comparing Somalia to Sweden.
This doesn’t really make much sense.
That’s like saying someone who breaks into your home has the right to kill you because you have the right to defend yourself from their illegal entry into your home.