Amazing, Six Members of the Clown Car did WHAT?

Do you support institutional bigotry


  • Total voters
    15
That's in the top ten, boys and girls. Adultery.

Homosexuality didn't make that list.

God didn't even want to grant divorce for adultery, that's how much he hates divorce. But Moses wore God down and talked Him into granting divorce for adultery.

But that's it. Divorce only for adultery. No divorce for "irreconcilable differences". No divorce because she got fat. No divorce because of male menopause.

But the Oregon hillbillies don't care. The fugly Kim Davis doesn't care. You can divorce and remarry as many times as you like. They don't care.

Hypocrites.
 
Where does biblical law allow refusing service? Is that what Jesus would have done? Nope...he's bake the gay cake and turn their water into wine.
Biblical law? You don't know the first thing about it! Go play with your dildos, you have nothing of value to offer here.
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.
Wow who appointed you Archbishop of Canterbury?
Who appointed the Oregon hillbilly bakers, hypocrite?

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

.
 
Homosexuality isn't in the Top Ten, but Adultery is.

If you divorce and remarry, you are violating one of the Ten Commandments.

Hypocrites.
 
Another verse with which you hypocrites should all familiarize yourselves: Matthew 7:1-3.

Better get to work on that beam in your own eye.
 
David Vitter, hypocrites. David Vitter sponsored that fucking atrocity of a bill.
 
Biblical law? You don't know the first thing about it! Go play with your dildos, you have nothing of value to offer here.
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.
Wow who appointed you Archbishop of Canterbury?
Who appointed the Oregon hillbilly bakers, hypocrite?

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

.
So you habe no answer?
 
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.
Wow who appointed you Archbishop of Canterbury?
Who appointed the Oregon hillbilly bakers, hypocrite?

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

.
So you habe no answer?
I not only answered, I kicked all of you hypocrites in the nuts.
 
I don't see Vitter and Rubio and Cruz lining up to help ban second marriages.

Hmmmm...

Matthew 7:1-3.
 
Biblical law? You don't know the first thing about it! Go play with your dildos, you have nothing of value to offer here.
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.
Wow who appointed you Archbishop of Canterbury?
Who appointed the Oregon hillbilly bakers, hypocrite?

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

.
Didnt Jesus say something like "judge not lest ye be judged"? Arent you really the hypocrite here?
 
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.
Wow who appointed you Archbishop of Canterbury?
Who appointed the Oregon hillbilly bakers, hypocrite?

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

.
So you habe no answer?
I not only answered, I kicked all of you hypocrites in the nuts.
You wimped out and refused to answer the questions. You obfuscated and moved the goalposts. IOW, a typical thread for you.
 
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.
Wow who appointed you Archbishop of Canterbury?
Who appointed the Oregon hillbilly bakers, hypocrite?

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

.
So you habe no answer?
I not only answered, I kicked all of you hypocrites in the nuts.
You wimped out and refused to answer the questions. You obfuscated and moved the goalposts. IOW, a typical thread for you.
Now THAT is funny.

We're in a topic about six candidates for President signing up to support a law which would allow people like the Oregon hillbilly bakers to discriminate against gays, and you want to make it about Muslims! YOU are the one tossing our red herrings, rube! BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
 
This law was clearly inspired by the Oregon hillbillies. After trying to blow off the story as false, Rabbi was confronted with irrefutable proof that two of the Senators running for President are not only supporters of the law, they are co-sponsors of it. So then Rabbi attempts to steer the topic away from the candidates and their bigotry and toward Muslims, the bogeyman du jour. The irony of a bigot smearing Muslims in order to protect the bigots described in the OP has not gone unnoticed.

Holy shit, that's a lot of smoke!

That's some serious hard work at diversion, boys and girls! :lol:
 
Where does biblical law allow refusing service? Is that what Jesus would have done? Nope...he's bake the gay cake and turn their water into wine.
Biblical law? You don't know the first thing about it! Go play with your dildos, you have nothing of value to offer here.
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.
I'm not a Christian, dumbfuck. When people change the subject they know they're wrong.
 
Where does biblical law allow refusing service? Is that what Jesus would have done? Nope...he's bake the gay cake and turn their water into wine.
Biblical law? You don't know the first thing about it! Go play with your dildos, you have nothing of value to offer here.
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.
I'm not a Christian, dumbfuck. When people change the subject they know they're wrong.
I am keeping things on topic.

The topic is about people like the bigoted Oregon hillbillies being allowed to discriminate against gays and using their "Christianity" as cover. I am blowing that cover to pieces.
 
Biblical law? You don't know the first thing about it! Go play with your dildos, you have nothing of value to offer here.
Matthew 19:9.
Haha, another biblical scholar! Matthew is in the NT, not Torah!
Do you think the Oregon hillbillies are biblical scholars?

Hypocrite.

Does Matthew 19:9 say if you remarry you are committing adultery, or not?

It's very straightforward, willfully blind hypocrite.

This is JESUS HIMSELF speaking: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.
I'm not a Christian, dumbfuck. When people change the subject they know they're wrong.
I am keeping things on topic.

The topic is about people like the bigoted Oregon hillbillies being allowed to discriminate against gays and using their "Christianity" as cover. I am blowing that cover to pieces.
People shouldn't need a religious reason but you are not in a position to determine how individuals interpret their religion. You are just making a food of yourself and the childish term you employ doesn't help.
 
So you advocate it's ok to discriminate against people.

So it's ok to deny electricity, heat, food gas and other things to gay people?

Do you realize that it can be applied to you too?

What would you do if someone bought the electric company in your area and decided they didn't want to sell electricity to you based on their religion?

How are you going to have electricity?

Or apply it to food, gas etc. What would you do if someone took that from you just because their version of their religion says you're bad?

Or how would you like it if a muslim denied you basic necessities of life based on your religion?

America doesn't condone discrimination. We have specific laws against it.

You have all the right in the world to believe what you want but you have absolutely no right to force it on anyone else and deny them basic necessities of life.
Sexual preference has only very recently been added. You people keep yapping like it was that way all along. That's bullshit. Utilities are controlled by government, it isn't the same as baking a gay cake. You guys are a joke.

So what if protections for gays is "recent" (some have had protections for decades) does not nullify those LOCAL laws.

In 1970 the prohibition on segregation was "recent"...still valid.
 
For the bigot, the word tradition means, "We've always discriminated against, and oppressed, this group and should be able to continue to do so forever".

It sucks for them that is not a rational basis for a legal argument.

"What do you mean I can't lynch negroes for fun and profit any more? Well, this is a recent rule and so it doesn't mean anything!"
 
So what if protections for gays is "recent" (some have had protections for decades) does not nullify those LOCAL laws.

In 1970 the prohibition on segregation was "recent"...still valid.
LOL, you are deranged! You bring up PA laws, I mention homosexuality is a recent addition and you respond with PA laws are still valid. Holy fuck.
 
Speaking of recent, and the bible, and redefining marriage, blah blah blah...

"What? How'd that Confederate flag get in that picture?"

bj8jth.jpg

A bible compliant marriage...one man, one woman, of the same race.
 
So what if protections for gays is "recent" (some have had protections for decades) does not nullify those LOCAL laws.

In 1970 the prohibition on segregation was "recent"...still valid.
LOL, you are deranged! You bring up PA laws, I mention homosexuality is a recent addition and you respond with PA laws are still valid. Holy fuck.

Yup...PA laws were recent in 1970. They were enforced none the less.

Aren't you a "states rights" guy?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom