Zone1 Quid Pro Quo is Latin For 'This for That'. "They gave Donald Trump millions['This']. Here's what they want [in return - 'That']"

In your opinion do any of these situations appear to you to be quid pro quo and why?


  • Total voters
    6
A player in the demolition? What does that mean?

The company occupied four floors of the north tower above the impact zone, and lost more than 650 people that day. :oops:
Yes, and the head of the company, Paul Bremer, became the first man put in charge after we invaded Iraq. The "impact zone" was not confined to just one floor. There were some sort of explosive charges placed on one or more of the CF floors.

To understand what that means you must first understand that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition. The official story advanced by NIST and others is false.
 
He's a 9/11 trufer. Put him on ignore before he lowers your IQ.
I don't use ignore, but yeah trufer there.

NIST didn't even put out an analysis of the twin towers, there was no serious question about what happened in those collapses, it was just Bldg 7 needed some answers...
 
Think about all those poor, dumb, b’stards who gave Kamala BILLIONS and got bupkis for their money.
 
I don't use ignore, but yeah trufer there.

NIST didn't even put out an analysis of the twin towers, there was no serious question about what happened in those collapses, it was just Bldg 7 needed some answers...
You're right on that point, but you know that the government's explanation for what brought the towers down was that burning office furnishings caused the steel to begin to melt and start the universal "pancake" collapse. Kevin Ryan working at Underwriter's Laboratory pointed out that was impossible because all the steel used in the building had met the fire code. Ryan wouldn't take it back, and was of course fired for speaking the truth.

20+ years later you still stand by that silly damn story. Talk about a weakened IQ.....
 
At first glance, it appears that they gave hundreds of millions of dollars for Trump to become president, because they think that his policies will benefit them by more than those amounts.

Is that something new to you? Do you imagine that Trump is the first one to do that?
No but MUSK has already made a nice profit on the money he spent to help Trump.
Just feel that personal MONEY making over enriching or country, May not be the best answer to solving our problems.
 
No but MUSK has already made a nice profit on the money he spent to help Trump.
Just feel that personal MONEY making over enriching or country, May not be the best answer to solving our problems.
Maybe not. Start with opposing international multi-Billionair George Soros, who was key in electing so many pro-criminal District Attorneys, so we know it's not just more Trump derangement.
 
The Democrats raised and spent twice as much as Trump, and their donors expected things as well.
 
Maybe not. Start with opposing international multi-Billionair George Soros, who was key in electing so many pro-criminal District Attorneys, so we know it's not just more Trump derangement.
Soros is not an elected member of our government. The money people are bad enough buying our country.
Lets center on those WE elect who then work in there own best interest, not our nation.
 
Well, RFK Jr will do very well poisoning us all. He may order a brain worm for every voter!
wow.
you suck at arguing and are very dumb.

this is why you lost.

you're so TDS you're pro poison.
 
wow.
you suck at arguing and are very dumb.

this is why you lost.

you're so TDS you're pro poison.
You will find out in a few months that you lost, when trump screws over the economy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top