WTF!! Killer Alec Baldwin given his own REALITY SHOW! Is the world insane?

The question is whether he knew it was a real gun. I think all of your are missing the premise of the whole acting thing..... :lol:
.



As the director, he's kind of the boss. It's his job to know.

Also, he's the producer. That means he's the bigger boss.

In any case, the one responsible for hiring every incompetent on the set. Layers and layers of accountability.




.
 
Everyone needs to get with the new program. Alot of the people in power now were not in Politics 10 years ago.
Nearly all the top people now in power – including Trump of course but also Musk, Gabbard, Kennedy, Lutnick, and so many more, to say nothing of the voters themselves – are refugees from the Democratic Party. Coalitions have dramatically changed. Voting blocs have migrated. And policy debates and priorities are nothing like they have been.

The old two party system has been hacked.

Why do you think this is a good thing? Kennedy, Gabbard, etc are all nutbags who have no business being in charge of anything.

They will fuck it up because they have no clue on what they're doing and they are firing the people who do.
 
.



As the director, he's kind of the boss. It's his job to know.

Also, he's the producer. That means he's the bigger boss.

In any case, the one responsible for hiring every incompetent on the set. Layers and layers of accountability.




.
Except Baldwin wasn't the director, and having a producer credit was probably a formality to give him a bigger slice of the profits as the star.
 
Except Baldwin wasn't the director, and having a producer credit was probably a formality to give him a bigger slice of the profits as the star.
.



Okay.

He aimed the gun at a human being and pulled the trigger. If you think that's acceptable behavior for a so-called adult, I guess you're entitled to your opinion.

I'm glad you don't live anywhere near me.




.
 
Why do you think this is a good thing? Kennedy, Gabbard, etc are all nutbags who have no business being in charge of anything.

They will fuck it up because they have no clue on what they're doing and they are firing the people who do.
If you voted for Dementia Joe Biden you have no business saying who should be in charge.
 
.
Okay.

He aimed the gun at a human being and pulled the trigger. If you think that's acceptable behavior for a so-called adult, I guess you're entitled to your opinion.

I'm glad you don't live anywhere near me.
.

He aimed a prop at a camera at the direction of camera-person. (Whether or not he pulled the trigger is up for debate, he says he didn't and the FBI destroyed the gun in the process of testing.)

It was up to the armorer to ensure that gun had no live bullets in it, not the actor. In fact, union rules on many movie sets prohibit actors from handling props until the cameras start rolling.

If you voted for Dementia Joe Biden you have no business saying who should be in charge.
Why, He did a fine job. I made more money on his watch than I've made in my entire life.
 
He aimed a prop at a camera at the direction of camera-person. (Whether or not he pulled the trigger is up for debate, he says he didn't and the FBI destroyed the gun in the process of testing.)

It was up to the armorer to ensure that gun had no live bullets in it, not the actor. In fact, union rules on many movie sets prohibit actors from handling props until the cameras start rolling.


Why, He did a fine job. I made more money on his watch than I've made in my entire life.
.



Oh! So nobody died that day. That clears up a lot!

Thanks.




.
 
So how did he hit her instead of the camera? THINK
Because he's a lousy shot? That would be my guess. At any rate, if she's behind the camera, it wouldn't take much at all to miss the camera and hit her.

I don't see anyone claiming he could hit the broadside of a barn.
 
He aimed a prop at a camera at the direction of camera-person. (Whether or not he pulled the trigger is up for debate, he says he didn't and the FBI destroyed the gun in the process of testing.)
You can't DESTROY a gun while merely testing if the trigger works correctly. It's another media lie to protect trump-hater baldwin. THINK
 
Just another shooting of an innocent American. Not a big deal.

Get over it!

There have been thousands of new ones since that one!
 
Because he's a lousy shot? That would be my guess. At any rate, if she's behind the camera, it wouldn't take much at all to miss the camera and hit her.
hey stupid. Even shooting blanks at a person is very dangerous. They are hit with the exploding powder. You know nothing about guns.
 
hey stupid. Even shooting blanks at a person is very dangerous. They are hit with the exploding powder. You know nothing about guns.
I know more than Baldwin did, apparently. I know not to point a gun at someone and pull the trigger. And, had they been observing firearm safety on the set, he would have been far enough away that he could easily miss the camera and hit her. You're making my point for me.
 
He aimed a prop at a camera at the direction of camera-person. (Whether or not he pulled the trigger is up for debate, he says he didn't and the FBI destroyed the gun in the process of testing.)

It was up to the armorer to ensure that gun had no live bullets in it, not the actor. In fact, union rules on many movie sets prohibit actors from handling props until the cameras start rolling.


Why, He did a fine job. I made more money on his watch than I've made in my entire life.

If you think Joe Biden actually made decisions this past 4 years I've got beachfront property in Arizona I'd like to sell you for real cheap.
 
Just another shooting of an innocent American. Not a big deal.

Get over it!

There have been thousands of new ones since that one!
Gun violence and gun accidents are a cost of liberty and freedom. Stop being such a drama queen.
 
You can't DESTROY a gun while merely testing if the trigger works correctly. It's another media lie to protect trump-hater baldwin. THINK

The FBI admitted the gun was damaged during testing at their lab.


Ziegler said he was only able to get the gun to fire during two of the tests, including at the fully cocked hammer position. “Some of the internal components of the firearm actually broke to allow that hammer to fall and fire the primed cartridge case,” Ziegler said.

Baldwin’s attorneys, through a spokesperson, declined to comment on the testimony.

Ziegler testified that the gun damage occurred during his testing at the FBI Lab.

“It was functioning normally when I received it,” Ziegler testified Monday. “As a result of the testing, it was damaged.”

Ziegler was one of three FBI experts who testified during Gutierrez’s trial on Monday. The proceedings were broadcast by Court TV.


hey stupid. Even shooting blanks at a person is very dangerous. They are hit with the exploding powder. You know nothing about guns.
My MOS in the army was 76Y. (Armorer/Unit Supply Specialist)

The point was that she wasn't killed by a blank, she was killed by a live round in a faulty gun placed in there by an incompetent armorer.


So how did he hit her instead of the camera? THINK
She was sitting by the Camera, after he had been given direction to point the gun at the camera to get an establishing shot.
 
The FBI admitted the gun was damaged during testing at their lab.
FBI lies about everything . They are trump-haters and lied to protect trump-hater baldwin.
She was sitting by the Camera, after he had been given direction to point the gun at the camera to get an establishing shot.
And yet he hit her, not the camera. Again i remind you, blanks are dangerous. No one will ask for a blank to be fired anywhere near them. THINK
 
Back
Top Bottom