Acquitted. Reported acquitted after officer destroys evidence.

Not saving the video could mean he didn't take any.
No. You can't fail to save something you never had.
I agree with you. But logic and media do not go together anymore. If you don't watch the news you are uninformed... If you do, you are misinformed.

If you want to trust the reporter without evidence... That's up to you. Go ahead.

But the cops wanted the jury to trust them without evidence. It didn't happen either.
 
I've been hearing though le that defense lawyers who pushed for the cameras, so they could show how oppressed their poor wittle defendants were,

Cameras work

They protect the police and protect the public.
In this case, the cameras were turned off


So, sure, let the "reporter" go. Next time, hopefully the cop will record her disobeying the law and we can watch her get body slammed and arrested like the criminal scum she is.
The press defend our freedom


The press lie to us in support of taking our freedom away.


Just like you.
It is a free press that keeps out of control Government in check

Look what they did with Trump


Lied to the American people to steal the election though fraud?

Yes, I did see that. It was terrible.
Where would we be without a free press keeping Donald J Trump in check?

We would have to accept his lies and misinformation on face value. We would not hear his vicious attacks on others or see his bullying.

Stopped a tyrant in his tracks


You mean like when he said, "nazis are bad" and the media told the voters that he said that they were "very fine people"?

lol!!! They should be tarred and feathered and rode out of town on a rail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top