About Those J6 “People”

[Mac1958]

I'm not walking anything back. You're literally making up my positions. Quote me saying Trump told people to go into the Capitol. You won't be able to because I never said that. I never said I want civil war. In fact, I said I don't want violence. I never said I assumed victory if there is civil war. I said if there is then we all lose.

How can I get you to debate with what I'm actually saying?

He constantly asks people if they "want a civil war".

I think that's supposed to scare you 'n stuff.

 

[Lesh]

He constantly asks people if they "want a civil war".

I think that's supposed to scare you 'n stuff.

And maybe egg on the crazier maga elements

 

[Political-Junkie]

He constantly asks people if they "want a civil war".

I think that's supposed to scare you 'n stuff.

The way I read it, he believes he can say whatever he wants without a threat of a violent reprisal but people saying things he opposes, shouldn't say those things.

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

The way I read it, he believes he can say whatever he wants without a threat of a violent reprisal but people saying things he opposes, shouldn't say those things.

They are in an echo chamber.

Trump has fucked them over. He's done so many terrible unprecedented things that they can't defend unless they just completely disregard facts and reality, and believe the line coming out of the Trump administration. It's an unhealthy place to have parties so divided, but given that this thread has stalled on a republican majority site leads me to believe that general conservatives are paying attention.

It's up to conservatives now. Trump put you in this position where there are so many things you can't defend. He did that to you.

 

[Marener]

w

When political violence is INCREASING, and your answer to any questions about "do you want to increase or decrease the violence" is something along the lines of "I want to use this to destroy my political enemies and **** you for even asking",

it is clear that you are on the path of escalation and not willing to stop till you win and see your enemies dead, or it blows up in your face.


I am just addressing that. It would be stupid to pretend that is not what you guys are doing.




Dude. **** THAT SHIT. WE LIVED THOUGH IT.

Your shit talk matters for nothing. Futher generations will be going though records like this and wondering how people like you thought that such stupid shit talk mattered, considering what you were pushing towards.



I think you need to seriously consider what happens, when you keep insisting on escalation, while people are already dying in the streets.

Did you live through it? I don't think that's a good way to put it. You weren't at the Capitol on January 6th. You weren't arrested. You weren't prosecuted. You weren't pardoned.

Everything you know about this was told to you by people on the internet and TV.

You were told things you perhaps really wanted to believe, and so you believed it.

But maybe just because you want to believe it, it's not really true?

Why do you get so upset when someone asks you to substantiate your version of events? You're not entitled to be believed.

 

[Captain Caveman]

At least 33 pardoned insurrectionists face other criminal charges—but many are now going free - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

At least 33 January 6th insurrectionists pardoned by Trump have been rearrested, charged or sentenced for other crimes since January 6, 2021.

www.citizensforethics.org

Child sex crimes

Assault

Weapons charges

Yeah. Pardon em and give em taxpayer money

Way to go Trump

As if assaulting cops and smashing their way into the Capitol wasn’t enough

Move on, you need closure, build a new focus.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Oh? Kindly post a link to those emails.

I wanna see all those emails.

 

[Knuckles Z]

Oh? Kindly post a link to those emails.

‘Political pawns’: FBI had 274 agents embedded in crowd on J6​

The FBI secretly embedded 274 plainclothes agents in the crowd during the Jan. 6, 2021 protests at the U.S. Capitol, according to an after-action report that was kept from the public for the duration of the Biden Administration.

The 50-page report was located by current FBI Director Kash Patel’s team and turned over to the House Judiciary Committee and its special subcommittee investigating J6 security failures and the weaponization of law enforcement.

‘Political pawns’: FBI had 274 agents embedded in crowd on J6

by WorldTribune Staff, September 26, 2025 Real World News The FBI secretly embedded 274 plainclothes agents in the crowd during the Jan. 6, 2021 protests at the U.S. Capitol, according to an after-…

worldtribune.com

 

[Political-Junkie]

‘Political pawns’: FBI had 274 agents embedded in crowd on J6​

The FBI secretly embedded 274 plainclothes agents in the crowd during the Jan. 6, 2021 protests at the U.S. Capitol, according to an after-action report that was kept from the public for the duration of the Biden Administration.

The 50-page report was located by current FBI Director Kash Patel’s team and turned over to the House Judiciary Committee and its special subcommittee investigating J6 security failures and the weaponization of law enforcement.

‘Political pawns’: FBI had 274 agents embedded in crowd on J6

by WorldTribune Staff, September 26, 2025 Real World News The FBI secretly embedded 274 plainclothes agents in the crowd during the Jan. 6, 2021 protests at the U.S. Capitol, according to an after-…

worldtribune.com

Wait, where are the emails you were talking about? Does this mean there are no emails backing your claim?

And the FBI was not embedded. Your article claims they were but that claim is not supported by Patel's after action report. The FBI sent 274 agents after the riot began as crowd control, meaning they didn't incite the riot.

FBI's Patel clarifies role of hundreds of agents on Jan 6, says Wray lied to Congress

FBI Director Kash Patel said that agents were sent into crowd control missions on Jan. 6 after a riot was declared, adding that that goes against FBI standards.

www.foxnews.com

Kash Patel: "Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police – something that goes against FBI standards."

 

[Mick2]

Wait, where are the emails you were talking about? Does this mean there are no emails backing your claim?

And the FBI was not embedded. Your article claims they were but that claim is not supported by Patel's after action report. The FBI sent 274 agents after the riot began as crowd control, meaning they didn't incite the riot.

FBI's Patel clarifies role of hundreds of agents on Jan 6, says Wray lied to Congress

FBI Director Kash Patel said that agents were sent into crowd control missions on Jan. 6 after a riot was declared, adding that that goes against FBI standards.

www.foxnews.com

Kash Patel: "Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police – something that goes against FBI standards."

Why were these hundreds of FBI agents in plain clothes and why did they violate FBI standards of procedure to be used as "crowd control" when they did not have the training to do so?

 

[Mick2]

Everything you know about this was told to you by people on the internet and TV.

You were told things you perhaps really wanted to believe, and so you believed it.

But maybe just because you want to believe it, it's not really true?

Like the J6 Dem committee and their made-for-TV prime time specials?

 

[Mick2]

The way I read it, he believes he can say whatever he wants without a threat of a violent reprisal but people saying things he opposes, shouldn't say those things.

To be fair, you people have now goaded left-wing terrorists into 4 major assassination attempts on the President of the United States in less than 2 years. You should have stopped long ago but you can't help yourselves. Violence is who you are.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Why were these hundreds of FBI agents in plain clothes and why did they violate FBI standards of procedure to be used as "crowd control" when they did not have the training to do so?

That was exactly Patel's criticism of Wray's decision to send them. Despite that, they could not have incited the violence since they were sent there in response to it after it started.

 

[Political-Junkie]

To be fair, you people have now goaded left-wing terrorists into 4 major assassination attempts on the President of the United States in less than 2 years. You should have stopped long ago but you can't help yourselves. Violence is who you are.

Oh? What did I say that incited 4 people to try to assassinate the president?

 

[Mick2]

That was exactly Patel's criticism of Wray's decision to send them. Despite that, they could not have incited the violence since they were sent there in response to it after it started.

So Patel was right for calling out Wray and Wray was wrong for doing that?

Btw, you dodged the question I asked. Why were there hundreds of FBI agents imbedded in plain clothes doing "crowd control" when it violated FBI procedures and they didn't have the training to do so?

You now have 2 questions to dodge. LOL

 

[Political-Junkie]

So Patel was right for calling out Wray and Wray was wrong for doing that?

Btw, you dodged the question I asked. Why were there hundreds of FBI agents imbedded in plain clothes doing "crowd control" when it violated FBI procedures and they didn't have the training to do so?

You now have 2 questions to dodge. LOL

Not being familiar with FBI procedures, I can only presume Parel was right. That answers your other question as well.

Still has nothing to do with people falsely stating the FBI had 274 agents embedded in that crowd to incite violence.

 

[Mick2]

Oh? What did I say that incited 4 people to try to assassinate the president?

"I"?

Since when is "people" singular?

LOL

 

[Political-Junkie]

"I"?

Since when is "people" singular?

LOL

You said "you people." That would include me.

 

[Mick2]

Not being familiar with FBI procedures, I can only presume Parel was right. That answers your other question as well.

In other words, you aren't really sure what Wray's motive was if you "presume" that he violated FBI protocol by doing it? Thanks for admitting that you're clueless despite attempting previously to make definitive statements on the matter. LOL

Still has nothing to do with people falsely stating....

I didn't "state" anything.....let alone something that proven "false". I asked you simple questions that you dodged but eventually answered with admitting you were just "presuming". LOL

Now if we don't know why Wray was sending in plain clothes FBI agents to do stuff they weren't trained to do and "presumably" break FBI protocol then we surely can't say he had a motive for good (i.e. entirely focused on ensuring peace) can we?

 

[Political-Junkie]

In other words, you aren't really sure what Wray's motive was if you "presume" that he violated FBI protocol by doing it? Thanks for admitting that you're clueless despite attempting previously to make definitive statements on the matter. LOL




I didn't "state" anything.....let alone something that proven "false". I asked you simple questions that you dodged but eventually answered with admitting you were just "presuming". LOL

Now if we don't know why Wray was sending in plain clothes FBI agents to do stuff they weren't trained to do and "presumably" break FBI protocol then we surely can't say he had a motive for good (i.e. entirely focused on ensuring peace) can we?

It doesn't matter what Trump's FBI Director's motives were. The point of all of this is about debunking the falsehood that 274 FBI agents were embedded in Trump's crowd to incite violence.

I didn't say you stated that falsehood.