About Those J6 “People”

[Political-Junkie]

No, we didn't. And even if we HAD, that was years ago, and rapidly receeding in history.

YOUR behavior is bigger and ongoing.






We could see that he was a hard core anti-American leftard. That was enough to know that we wanted to oppose him.

We did not launch an impeachment to bog down his administration on bullshit grounds. Like your side did.



I will continue to do so. In hopes of waking some of you up, and derailing our march towards civil war.

You are an asshole.

Of course your side did. From the top down. From the top you had Trump trying to get fake electors in Pences hands to flip the election. From the down, you had MAGA storming the Capitol, trying to stop Biden's certification.

 

[Nostra]

Nope. Never made that claim. And there was no math TO be over my head Short Bus

Moroner did.

Take it up with that lying sack.

 

[Marener]

Moroner did.

That’s a lie.

 

[Nostra]

Do you think any medical intervention prevents death?

Keep scrambling, liar.

 

[Nostra]

That’s a lie.

You claimed it "prevented" Covid.

It doesn't.

That makes you a liar.

 

[Marener]

You claimed it "prevented" Covid.

It doesn't.

That makes you a liar.

It reduces mortality by 75%, meaning it prevents death.

Don’t you think lowering your chance of dying from COVID by 75% is a good thing?

 

[struth]

It reduces mortality by 75%, meaning it prevents death.

Don’t you think lowering your chance of dying from COVID by 75% is a good thing?

Actually what that seventy five figures proves is it doesn’t prevent death…in fact 25 percent died

Saying it prevents death is more lies

Yes it is a good thing to lower your chance it’s a bad thing to lie and claim it prevents it

 

[Lesh]

Actually what that seventy five figures proves is it doesn’t prevent death…in fact 25 percent died

Saying it prevents death is more lies

Yes it is a good thing to lower your chance it’s a bad thing to lie and claim it prevents it

So you’re still bitching about what you see as an exaggeration of effectiveness while exaggerating what you see as the INeffectiveness

In other words, you’re trolling… stupidly

 

[Marener]

Actually what that seventy five figures proves is it doesn’t prevent death…in fact 25 percent died

Saying it prevents death is more lies

Yes it is a good thing to lower your chance it’s a bad thing to lie and claim it prevents it

Millions of deaths were prevented because of the vaccine. That’s a scientific fact.

 

[struth]

Millions of deaths were prevented because of the vaccine. That’s a scientific fact.

I don’t disagree the trump vaccine saved lives. And it’s crazy to think of the genocide that it prevented considering even with them xiden still gave us record COVID deaths

What I am saying is that it doesn’t prevent death, or even getting sick like xiden falsely claimed

 

[struth]

So you’re still bitching about what you see as an exaggeration of effectiveness while exaggerating what you see as the INeffectiveness

In other words, you’re trolling… stupidly

It was a lie. One that you said was retarted to say

An exaggeration would be claiming that 80 percent of the people that got it didn’t die, when it was only 75 percent

It’s a lie, to claim you won’t even get sick like xiden claimed

 

[Marener]

I don’t disagree the trump vaccine saved lives. And it’s crazy to think of the genocide that it prevented considering even with them xiden still gave us record COVID deaths

What I am saying is that it doesn’t prevent death, or even getting sick like xiden falsely claimed

How do you save a life with it preventing a death?

You’re so illogical, because you’re mentally deranged, like a lot of the COVID deniers out there.

 

[struth]

How do you save a life with it preventing a death?

You’re so illogical, because you’re mentally deranged, like a lot of the COVID deniers out there.

Huh? You aren’t making sense, I never said some deaths were prevented

Notice I used the word some to qualify the statement

You claimed, falsely, like xiden, that the shot prevented death

It didn’t. It prevented some deaths

 

[Marener]

I never said some deaths were prevented

I never said all deaths were prevented.

That would be a stupid thing to claim. Nothing works 100% of the time.

 

[Political-Junkie]

There is no way considering the logic of the crackdown, that a man screaming to go into the capitol building before it happened, would not be "HIGH on the totem pole".

You are playing retard, as a form of stonewalling. You are an asshole.


YOu said that telling people to go into the capitol building was "inciting violence". You said it in context of TRUMP saying it, but EPPS said the same thing.


And for some reason, you give Epps a PASS on that, while holding Trump to a far different, adn far harsher standard.


That is you being a dishonest asshole.

Because he didn't incite anyone. No one around him was listening to him.

And I never said Trump told anyone to go inside the Capitol. You should stop accusing me of saying that.

What I said was Epps told people to go into the Capitol peacefully. Trump told people to march to the Capitol peacefully. You claimed Epps incited violence to which I pointed out to you, your logic dictates Trump incited violence. Then when you tried to spin it on me after I showed you what they did the same, I showed you what they did differently.

Epps said no one should be harmed, it's not about hurting people, while Trump spewed incendiary rhetoric about fighting like hell and you gotta show strength or you're going to lose your country.

Epps spoke to less than 100 while Trump spoke a couple of hundred thousand followers.

Epps' call to enter the Capitol was responded with rejection while Trump's incendiary rhetoric was responded with calls to take the Capitol.

Epps was a nobody, who nobody listened to while Trump was the POTUS and leader of MAGA where the vast majority of followers listened.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Just like Trump. And you said that it meant that he was inciting violence.

Your stonewalling here is you being a ******* asshole.

No, I didn't say that meant Trump was inciting violence. I said your logic dictates he incited violence.

But I don't agree with that logic of yours because I don't agree with you that Epps incited violence as I showed in the post before this one.

But it's your logic which means according to your own logic, you are saying Trump incited violence.

In your own words, "you lost the debate when you did that."