About Those J6 “People”

[Correll]

Regardless

She served ZERO jail time. You lied

lol.

Do you want a ******* civil war?

 

[Correll]

That is an unfounded conspiracy theory. I find it entirely unsurprising that you believe it since it is essential to your perverted view of the events that unfolded on J/6.

Yet you lefties are all here to defend a man that was screaming at people that they needed to get into the capitol building.

You are just a shit talker.

 

[Correll]

No, she didn't plead guilty.

Dude. YOu admitted that you believe that calling for people to enter the capitol was inciting violence.


You lost this debate when you did that.

You are stone cold busted, with your own words.

 

[Political-Junkie]

False.

Ray was giving a PASS, until after a YEAR of conservatives ridiculting the ******* SHIT out of the fbi for not arresting him.

Also, you have admitted in your last post, that you consider "telling people to go into the capitol" is "inciting violence".

So...you are disagreeing with yourself. Becasue your position makes no sense.


Just admit it. The fbi had assets on hand, and they were inciting violence.


How do you want to move forward?

Do you want to deal with this in a way to heal our wounds,

or do you want to use this as a weapon against your enemies, even if it escalates the political conflict, and leads to a civil war?

They were treated differently because they committed crimes Epps didn't. That's the end of it.

 

[jacksonlamb]

To me, and all of maga, and really, more adn more regular republicans,

that translates to MORE VIOLENCE.

Are you prepared for that?

You guys are wusses. Come and get it.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Moving forward, do you want more political violence, or less?

You sound as if you know you are walking to destruction. OK. Come for it.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Here teh lefty is holding two contradictory positions, that telling people to go into the capitol is inciting violence, and that telling people to go into the capitol is not inciting violence.

My positions are not contradictory since I believe there are differences between the two.

 

[Political-Junkie]

NOt sure what you want here. I didn't save teh article when I read of hte grandmother being charged with assaulting the police officer...

So....

Who reported she was charged with a crime she was never charged with?

 

[Political-Junkie]

No, you want me to pretend that something that happened, that was reported in the news, that I discussed with leftards at the time, that leftards at teh time defended,

didn't happen, because it is buried in the amount of data from the 1/6 investigations/


That's...just ******* retarded.



This discussion, the way that your side is defending the feds, and especially the example of Ray Epps,


is your side defending POLITICAL ARRESTS and POLITITICAL PRISONERS.


That's a big problem for this country. We can't have POLITICAL PRISONERS, as part of the new normal moving forward.


We on the right will not accept that.


Do you want a civil war?

If civil war breaks out, are you going to participate?

 

[Lockback]

If civil war breaks out, are you going to participate?

Are you?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Regardless

She served ZERO jail time. You lied

He got a lot wrong about her.

He said she was charged with assault. She wasn't.

He said she did time in jail. She didn't.

He suggested she pleaded guilty. She didn't.

 

[beagle9]

It was never validated. Those FBI agents were sent to the Capitol in response to the rioting, meaning they didn't incite it.

MSN

"These were not undercover agents embedded in the crowd. They were part of the multi-agency law enforcement response after the Capitol was attacked, as the documents themselves make clear," Cheney tweeted.

Here's the deal... If you could somehow cover up all of the coordinated insurrectionist activities and lawfare the Democrats had engaged in from 2016 to 2020 and beyond, then you just might have some sort of leg to stand on. What you people attempt to do is isolate an event by separating the entire history that goes along with it, and you are doing this in hopes that Americans aren't able to put two and two together when assessing the response being created by the entire get Trump TDS long running narrative.

No one is as dumb or naive as you Democrats wished they were, so deal with Trump being your president whether you like it or not, and pull your heads out of your aces finally.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Dude. YOu admitted that you believe that calling for people to enter the capitol was inciting violence.


You lost this debate when you did that.

You are stone cold busted, with your own words.

I honestly can't explain how you read my words and think I said that?

I never said Trump called for anyone to go into Capitol. He told people to go to the Capitol, not into it. I said his words incited the violence that erupted.

But if you need to twist my words into something I didn't say so you can feel like you won a debate, more power to ya.

 

[Correll]

They were treated differently because they committed crimes Epps didn't. That's the end of it.

That's shit talk, especially considering that you admitted that, in your own mind, TRUMP saying those words, was "inciting violence".

So, I ask again,...no, it fine, it is clear.

You are going to keep escalating, until it blows up in your face, or all your enemies are in camps or dead.

So, let's do it.