- Thread starter
- #21
You're post are lying BS by RWNJ's that think their idea's are "originalist".
Gaslighting only works are morons.
Put a little effort into a post.....if you are capable of such.
Here's how it's done:
- As a basis for understanding the Commerce Clause, Professor Barnett examined over 1500 times the word ‘commerce’ appeared in the Philadelphia Gazette between 1715 and 1800. In none of these was the term used to apply more broadly than the meaning identified by Justice Thomas in his concurring opinion in ‘Lopez,’ in which he maintained that the word ‘commerce’ refers to the trade and exchange of goods, and that process, including transportation of same. A common trilogy was ‘agriculture, manufacturing and commerce.’
- For an originalist, direct evidence of the actual use of a word is the most important source of the word’s meaning. It is more important than referring to the ‘broader context,’ or the ‘larger context,’ or the ‘underlying principles,’ which is the means by which some jurists are able to turn ‘black’ into ‘white’, and ‘up’ into ‘down.’
Can you provide several of the books that have informed your geopolitical outlook????
Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.
Or....you can default to your usual "...duhhhhh......."