How do you know how the GOP would react?
He asked the reader to guess what it would be.
I find it sad that you took it as him really asking the reader that as opposed to implying something else. Your reading comprehension skills are quite lacking.
I find it sad that you go after another poster as you accuse him of assuming what the GOP would doeven as you make an assumption as to what you think rdking was going to say. LOL Fact is that rdking did NOT say what the GOP would do, he asked a question and you responded by asking him how he would know what the GOP would do when he made no such argument.
Didn't the GOP in congress have the filibuster to rely on?? Since you are comparing state to fed is there a similar option available to those in the wisconsin state legislature
Certainly not taking a bus ride out of state and yet still expecting the tacpayer to pay your salary
Can you actually answer the question or is avoidance all that you have to offer? They sought to delay the passage if the legislation until everyone actually knew what was in it and as far as I know that was their only choice. Did they have another option or should they just lay down and play dead as the legislation gets rammed through without debate?
I know that is what he and many on the right are saying but can you quote and cite a specific speech in which walker made exactly what is in the bill part of his campaign promises??
I am sure you can find it if you are anxious to refute it. Try google.
It's your claim, PROVE IT. Based on your avoidance my guess is that you can't prove it. Is that why you are trying to make me do YOUR homework??
and yet the right opposed obama at every turn despite how he won and tried to do what he campaign on. Funny how reality kicks you in the teeth.
Excuse me? The GOP debated as was their job to do. You did not see people taking off from their jobs to argue legislation regarding their jobs.
Uh your side step doesn't change the FACT that obama campaigned on HC and won so there were no surprises and yet he was met with obstruction from the right. Why make comments in response to my comments that don't actually address what I said??
You do realize, of course, what is going on here....it was like proposition 8 in California...
The elections were fine with everyone...until one side lost in the elction....then those people did not want to go along with the results of the election.....
Huh?? It would be one thing IF walker was proposing to strip ALL unions of their collective bargaining rights but he is choosing to only go after those that tend to support democratic candidates. That proves that this is purely political and the budget is just a means to an end.
Wrong. He is going after the unions that represent state employees seeing as he is in charge of balancing the state budget...which is way out of balance. You opt to ignore that and regurgitate what the left is saying by claiming he is only going after democratic supporting unions. In other words...you are falling for their hate rhetoric
Uh in case you missed it, walker excluded firefighter and police unions from his bill and guess which party they support most of the time?? Furthermore, the unions are willing to give walker the budget concessions he asked for. He can fix a minor part of the problem through compromise but he refuses to compromise. BTW can you show how "way out of balance" the wisconsin budget is because according to something I read they are actually expected to have a minor surplus this year.
You are out of your league with me Smith.
I have told you that numerous times.
I state fact...you regurgitate rhetoric.
And yet you got thoroughly owned. LOL what facts did you state??
You went after another poster for making assumptions as you made an assumption about him.
You made a claim about what walker campaigned on and then ran away when asked to prove your claim. How is that stating fact??
You pretend that walker is going after unions that represent state employees and yet he excluded two of the primary state employee unions.
You posted a response to a statement but didn't actually address what was said in that statement.
You throw in rhetoric as you try to compare this situation to the vote on prop 8 when you failed to show how walker is doing EXACTLY what he campaigned on.
Those examples show that your post seems more along the lines of regurgitating rhetoric. So where ar the facts that you claimed to present? LOL