A sobering question regarding US bombing Iran nuke program

[TimFitz]

I remember them, they were caused by OPEC cutting production, not shipping losses. in 1984, 28 ships were attacked by EITHER Iraq or Iran. Of those ONE was sunk, and seven received severe damage. In 1987, 86 ships were attacked, with 4 sunk and 10 severely damaged. In 1988, 83 ships were attacked with 2 sunk and 13 receiving severe damage. Most attacks involved boats with outboard motors shooting RPGs and machine guns. Some Silkworms were involved against unescorted ships. Those attacks cost Iran half of its navy destroyed as well as several offshore drilling platforms.

I made no reference to shipping loss. The oil stopped.

it will this time too.

 

[TimFitz]

Liar

Evidence?

 

[Oddball]

The regulators have NEVER been allowed unrestricted inspections.

Same can be said for.....wait for it.....












Israel.

 

[TimFitz]

Thats not what I heard

The Irans were not allowing full access

Then stop getting your “news’ from glorified right wing talk show hosts!

Iran nuclear deal: Trump administration approves agreement but review looms

White House certifies Tehran’s compliance but Rex Tillerson says a review will establish whether agreement is in US interests

www.theguardian.com

Statement on Iran by the IAEA Spokesperson | International Atomic Energy Agency

www.iaea.org

Didn’t you clowns learn anything from the last time??????????

This is the exact same BS Bush sold.

 

[jotathought]

If I am in Iran, I don't like being told what I can and cannot have. Especially when others have it.

But that is the nature of living in a global community.

People are not going to respect what I don't like when my leaders are whack-jobs

Iran volunteered to sign and ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention, as well as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty -- these are binding agreements with severe consequences when violated. No one is telling them what they can't have .. they volunteered for it. A country will have nukes because:

• they didn't ratify the optional agreements listed above
• they already had nuclear weapons before ratifying (aka grandfathered) the agreements
• they are in illegal possession or development of nuclear weapons

If they had not ratified these, there would be customary international law and strong political norms against WMD proliferation. They'd face economic sanctions, military deterrence, diplomatic isolation, and the risk of preemptive strikes.

 

[westwall]

Same can be said for.....wait for it.....












Israel.

True. The huge difference is Israel has had nukes for decades, and never used them.

The second Iran gets one, they would.

 

[Oddball]

True. The huge difference is Israel has had nukes for decades, and never used them.

The second Iran gets one, they would.

Nobody can't say that with any certainty.

I'm not so stupid to believe that the mullahs would want to rule over a pile of radioactive ashes.

 

[Mac-7]

Then stop getting your “news’ from glorified right wing talk show hosts!

Iran nuclear deal: Trump administration approves agreement but review looms

White House certifies Tehran’s compliance but Rex Tillerson says a review will establish whether agreement is in US interests

www.theguardian.com

Statement on Iran by the IAEA Spokesperson | International Atomic Energy Agency

www.iaea.org

Didn’t you clowns learn anything from the last time??????????

This is the exact same BS Bush sold.

You pick and choose what to believe based on your bias

 

[Moonglow]

I want all MAGATs and other idiots that voted fer Trump to be first in, stand up, hook up and shuffle to the door and jump out on the count of four.
**** yeah, die fer yer King Taco- loco!

 

[Moonglow]

You pick and choose what to believe based on your bias

Just like you believe this to be aoral cause unlike Ukraine.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I made no reference to shipping loss. The oil stopped.

it will this time too.

The oil stopped because OPEC cut production. The flow of tankers never stopped, the losses were minor compared to the volume of shipping.

 

[Mac-7]

Just like you believe this to be aoral cause unlike Ukraine.

Could you say that more clearly?

 

[Leo123]

The intel for Fordow was very accurate I would bet they destroyed everything. Damage reports say there was no need for the B-2's to go back and do another round. They are on their way back right now to the U.S. 6-bunker busters dropped into 2 vents at Fordow. The enrichment sites Nantz and Isfahan were destroyed by 30 tomahawks from U.S. Ohio Class missile sub. (Reporter: Jennifer Griffin)

 

[Moonglow]

Could you say that more clearly?

A moral cause

 

[Moonglow]

The intel for Fordow was very accurate I would bet they destroyed everything. Damage reports say there was no need for the B-2's to go back and do another round. They are on their way back right now to the U.S. 6-bunker busters dropped into 2 vents at Fordow. The enrichment sites Nantz and Isfahan were destroyed by 30 tomahawks from U.S. Ohio Class missile sub. (Reporter: Jennifer Griffin)

The sites were cleared of anything of value.

 

[BluesLegend]

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

President Trump made it crystal clear, give up and dismantle or these are only the first bombs Iran will get smacked with. This will seem like barely a flesh wound.

 

[Leo123]

The sites were cleared of anything of value.

Our MOBs certainly cleared those sites. Do you have proof the Mullahs moved their nuclear material before the strike?

 

[Moonglow]

Our MOBs certainly cleared those sites. Do you have proof the Mullahs moved their nuclear material before the strike?

They had plenty of warning from Trump

 

[Leo123]

They had plenty of warning from Trump

So you have no proof anything was moved, just more TDS and "Orange Man Bad" garbage.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Evidence?

Your lips are moving.