A sobering question regarding US bombing Iran nuke program

[JohnDB]

 

[Ringo]

The morning of June 22. The U.S. bombs Iran.
Trump announced a successful US Air Force attack on three Iranian nuclear sites: The US Air Force conducted a successful attack on three Iranian nuclear sites, all planes returned to airbases. This is stated in a message posted by American President Donald Trump on "Truth Social".
For many residents of the former Soviet Union, the tragedy of this date is obvious. Did Trump know and think about it? Not the fact.
The fact is that the consequences of this event may turn this date into the most tragic for all mankind.

 

[j-mac]

War with Iran = Trump loses his base!

According to the latest Fox News poll, conducted between June 13-16 among 1,003 registered voters, 73 percent think Iran poses a real threat to the U.S., a 13-point increase from six years ago.

That includes a majority of Democrats (69 percent), Republicans (82 percent), and Independents (62 percent), and those numbers are up since 2019 (by 12, 17, and 4 points respectively), says Fox News.

US support for Donald Trump attacking Iran revealed in polls

While most voters agree Iran is a serious national security threat across party lines, support for Trump's aggressive stance is divided along party lines.

www.newsweek.com

 

[j-mac]

The GOP majority is already in deep shit, with no investigations/arrests from DOJ concerning J6, Epstein & Cossfire/Hurricane, the failure to enact DOGE cuts, the failure to codify common sense EOs, no action on securing elections, stalling and fiddle-******* with the "Big Beautiful Bill".

Though the demoncrats are borderline insane, the vast majority of the GOP are impotent, dithering cucks....That doesn't inspire voters to show up at all.

Well, I won’t say republicans are a well oiled machine, however, they’re getting this one right.

 

[Ringo]

So, in the best Western tradition, at exactly around 4am Moscow time, just as Russia was commemorating the dead of WWII, the US dropped up to 6 anti-bunker bombs on Iran's Fordow nuclear facility, and fired 30 Tomahawk missiles at the Isfahan and Natanz facilities.

Following the results, Trump said he had completely destroyed Iran's uranium production capacity and demanded an urgent surrender and peace with him, threatening more bombing of Iran. However, Iranian TV filmed the site of the “nuclear catastrophe” and somehow it looks neither like Hiroshima nor Chernobyl.

The footage shows that there is no panic in the city, people are walking calmly through the streets. Mannan Raisi, a representative of the city of Qom in the Iranian parliament: There is no damage to underground structures and no radiation. A commentator for Iran's state broadcaster IRIB said on air after the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities that every American citizen and soldier in the region is now a “legitimate target.”

However, already in the morning Erdogan met with the Iranian ambassador, and during the day Iranian authorities will receive calls from all sides of the planet to convince them not to “allow escalation” and not to respond to the U.S. strike. Then they would throw up their hands and accuse Iran of violating the agreements when responding to new strikes.

The scheme, which was tested back in Yugoslavia, continues to work like clockwork and has recently been practiced in Russia. Its meaning is simple and we have seen it many times: first, the Americans say that they will not escalate, request negotiations, and praise the enemy in the media.

Then they launch a “test strike” or send Javelins, as was the case with Russia, to see if they can move on. We saw how the russians lived up to strike on their nuclear triad in 3 years. At the same time they broadcast to everyone that they are not involved in the war and therefore any response to their actions will be an attack. Yes, that's right, a retaliatory strike on US and NATO bases will be declared an “act of aggression” and “disruption of the peace process”.

If there is no response, then the “frog” can be cooked further and more severe blows will follow and they will follow this pattern until Iran either capitulates or starts full-fledged military actions, with each new round receiving painful blows. So it will not be possible to sit it out in the bunker, the proverb about war and shame has not lost its relevance.

True, otherwise, if Iran launches massive strikes on American bases, escalation is guaranteed. Then it is even easier for the U.S. - they simply announce that Iran has made an unmotivated attack and it is urgent to increase pressure. Then the grief stretched in the first case will become much more fleeting.

There is a third option - to capitulate. The truth is that further on there will be the collapse and the Libyanization of the country with the war of all against all, as well as the transfer of all the country's assets in the hands of the West. But this is the option that the West and Israel intend to pull off.

It is not clear what Tehran will choose, but it is clear that the worst is yet to come.

 

[Mac-7]

You ***** were claiming he would make peace with countries and you all were calling him a president of peace, now you all is war pigs like the Dems you chided during Biden.

You think this is a game on TV and trump is being penalized 5 yards for being off sides

So you totally ignore the consequences of allowing Iran to go nuclear

Fortinately people with your mindset are not in charge

 

[CrusaderFrank]

According to the latest Fox News poll, conducted between June 13-16 among 1,003 registered voters, 73 percent think Iran poses a real threat to the U.S., a 13-point increase from six years ago.

That includes a majority of Democrats (69 percent), Republicans (82 percent), and Independents (62 percent), and those numbers are up since 2019 (by 12, 17, and 4 points respectively), says Fox News.

US support for Donald Trump attacking Iran revealed in polls

While most voters agree Iran is a serious national security threat across party lines, support for Trump's aggressive stance is divided along party lines.

www.newsweek.com

Based on what, because the Best Biden EVAH! media said so?

 

[konradv]

I support using US military bombing Iran nuke site

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

Even if we destroy their nuclear reactor are they far enough along already to assemble one or more nuclear warheads?

Hard to say. They’ve been “weeks away” for about 30 years now.

 

[Mac-7]

You think this is a game on TV and trump is being penalized 5 yards for being off sides

So you totally ignore the consequences of allowing Iran to go nuclear

Fortinately people with your mindset are not in charge

My preferred option is collapse of the Islamic Republic and a pro western democracy instead

 

[j-mac]

Based on what, because the Best Biden EVAH! media said so?

Simply showing you that a vast majority are on board with putting an end to Iran's nuke program.

And, that includes 69% of Democrats buddy...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Simply showing you that a vast majority are on board with putting an end to Iran's nuke program.

And, that includes 69% of Democrats buddy...

"You'll never go broke underestimating the taste of the American public" -- H.L. Mencken.

Iran wasn't even involved in 9/11!

What did the bad Iranians do to American lately?

 

[Lisa558]

you trust the regime in Iran ? its true .. leftism is a mental illness .

Leftists believe Islamic terrorists over Jews, so it’s no surprise.

 

[Moonglow]

You think this is a game on TV and trump is being penalized 5 yards for being off sides

So you totally ignore the consequences of allowing Iran to go nuclear

Fortinately people with your mindset are not in charge

Iran never went nuclear, that's the rub

 

[Mac-7]

Iran never went nuclear, that's the rub

And we want to keep it that way

 

[j-mac]

"You'll never go broke underestimating the taste of the American public" -- H.L. Mencken.

Iran wasn't even involved in 9/11!

What did the bad Iranians do to American lately?

Look Frank, you either believe a nuclear armed Iran, the worlds largest state sponsor of terrorism across the globe, is no problem with a nuke, OR, like a vast majority of Americans, that they are a threat, and that their nuke program needed to be taken out.

I’m getting a picture of where you are.

 

[j-mac]

Iran never went nuclear, that's the rub

White House says Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in 'a couple of weeks'

The White House says Iran has all it needed to produce a nuclear weapon in "a couple of weeks" once given the go-ahead from Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

abcnews.go.com

You people are a joke.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Look Frank, you either believe a nuclear armed Iran, the worlds largest state sponsor of terrorism across the globe, is no problem with a nuke, OR, like a vast majority of Americans, that they are a threat, and that their nuke program needed to be taken out.

I’m getting a picture of where you are.

I’ll keep asking why you believe that a nuclear weapon is the ONE AND ONLY weapon of mass destruction to be feared?!

Iran could easily have hired Fauci to develop a pathogen

If Iran wanted to destroy Israel and America they could have done so already

 

[j-mac]

I’ll keep asking why you believe that a nuclear weapon is the ONE AND ONLY weapon of mass destruction to be feared?!

Iran could easily have hired Fauci to develop a pathogen

If Iran wanted to destroy Israel and America they could have done so already

So, you don’t care if Iran got a nuke? Sad

 

[Zavulon]

I support using US military bombing Iran nuke site

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

Even if we destroy their nuclear reactor are they far enough along already to assemble one or more nuclear warheads?

It is simply irrelevant if the Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed or not. By this illegal and unprovoked attack against civilian nuclear infrastructure the USA just effectively finished Non-proliferation treaty. And this means that Iran will have good, brand new Russian, Chinese, Pakistani or Korean nukes (with delivery systems) pretty son.

 

[j-mac]

It is simply irrelevant if the Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed or not. By this illegal and unprovoked attack against civilian nuclear infrastructure the USA just effectively finished Non-proliferation treaty. And this means that Iran will have good, brand new Russian, Chinese, Pakistani or Korean nukes (with delivery systems) pretty son.

Not a chance…very simplistic thinking here…