A right to discriminate.

[Pete7469]

If you are offering products or services (that are identical for everyone i.e. snow removal) then yes.
If, as in this case, you are looking to hire someone to design something for you who doesn't want to do it, why would you insist that they do rather than go to someone else?
Do you think you would get their best effort?

That's not the point. The point was TO FORCE someone to do something against their will. If any of the people who have been ruined by nazi-queer litigants had done a half-assed job, they'd still get sued. I suspect that if they didn't exceed standard quality they'd get hauled into court. These people were targeted deliberately by leftist parasites. It wasn't about cake, it was about victimizing an "oppressor". You have to remember that these sniveling lunatics are not nice people, they're not interested in merely being tolerated and coexist with an otherwise oblivious population. They're demanding attention like spoiled children.


.

 

[Concerned American]

Twitter cannot discriminate by refusing to provide an account for someone because of race, gender, religion etc. That is different than setting rules for the content unless the rules are different or applied unequally based on the above.

Why do you differentiate between the proprietors' right to accommodate their religious beliefs and the customer's right to be served. The business owner is not the only provider available. The customer is free to use any web designer they choose that is not opposed to that content. This is akin to slavery when you force someone to perform work that they are opposed to.