A little more about evolution by the experts.

[Hollie]

And you can't prove the God doesn't exist, so it's a draw.

I actually can prove that the gods don't exist. Prove me wrong.

 

[Woodznutz]

You understand that the Noah's Ark fable is not a literal rendering of history, right?

I'm just explaining the story. Most don't understand it.

 

[Woodznutz]

I actually can prove that the gods don't exist. Prove me wrong.

Show me your proof.

 

[Hollie]

Show me your proof.

Wait, what? You expect me to support an argument with facts and evidence?

 

[surada]

Noah's flood came in from the sea, like a tide.

Lol which ocean?

 

[Hollie]

I'm just explaining the story. Most don't understand it.

I read that a lot from posters in these forums. They claim to have a special or unique understanding of biblical events which gives them an authoritative explanation of those events. They have the real truth and the onus is on you to belive them.

 

[Hollie]

Noah's flood came in from the sea, like a tide.

The moon's gravity causes tides. Maybe angels were pushing the moon at high speed around the earth?

 

[Woodznutz]

Wait, what? You expect me to support an argument with facts and evidence?

You said you had proof.

 

[Woodznutz]

The moon's gravity causes tides. Maybe angels were pushing the moon at high speed around the earth?

I said like a tide.

 

[Woodznutz]

I said like a tide.

 

[Woodznutz]

Lol which ocean?

Hard to know, maybe all of them.

 

[Hollie]

You said you had proof.

I do. Prove me wrong

Did you not read that I was being facetious in my post?

To assert gods, arks, men living to be 900 years old, etc., presents no obligation on my part to disprove anything. Claims absent support, claims that rely on supernatural gods, claims that carry no evidence require nothing from me. I don't disprove claims that the claimant can't support.

 

[Woodznutz]

I read that a lot from posters in these forums. They claim to have a special or unique understanding of biblical events which gives them an authoritative explanation of those events. They have the real truth and the onus is on you to belive them.

I have a unique understanding of the flood story because I actually read the story.

 

[Woodznutz]

I do. Prove me wrong

Did you not read that I was being facetious in my post?

You said,
"I actually can prove that the gods don't exist. Prove me wrong."

I don't see what's facetious about your statement?

 

[Hollie]

I said like a tide.

Rainfall raining upward and pushing the unit weight of water to overcome gravity seems unlikely.

 

[Hollie]

You said,
"I actually can prove that the gods don't exist. Prove me wrong."

I didn't catch the facetious part.

Disprove my disproof of the gods.

 

[Woodznutz]

Disprove my disproof of the gods.

Like I said, it's a draw.

 

[Woodznutz]

Rainfall raining upward and pushing the unit weight of water to overcome gravity seems unlikely.

Rainfall runs downhill, tidelike floods go uphill.

"Forty days of rain": runs off downhill into the sea.

"Fountains of the deep (sea) breaking up": tidelike floods rising uphill covering the land.

 

[Hollie]

I have a unique understanding of the flood story because I actually read the story.

Your understanding must be wrong because it conflicts with others who have read the story and the real unique understanding.

 

[Hollie]

Like I said, it's a draw.

So, you agree you can't disprove my disproof.