A great example of why socialism is better than "charity"

[sealybobo]

You are right about conservatives

I would certainly hope so, since I am one.

You said the conservative puts the wife down.

That is after he exhausts all other options of course which means begging friends first then the government.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Really?

You're criticizing a women's shelter for not allowing a mentally-unstable man to sleep there among vulnerable women?

 

[Anathema]

You said the conservative puts the wife down.

That is after he exhausts all other options of course which means begging friends first then the government.

Not at all. The Conservative understands Personal Responsibility and therefore does not beg anyone to pay for their needs. The Conservative understands thst once something is no longer useful and becomes a burden it needs to be disposed of lest it drag everyone down with it.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Lots of conservative hatred bubbling up here. No shocks there.

It is not “hatred” to recognize that a mentally-ill male pervert, disguised as a woman, is not, in fact, an actual woman, and has no business demanding access to a women's facility.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

You all know that being transgender doesnt [sic] mean just dressing up as a woman dont [sic] you ?

Dont [sic] you ?

Yes, we know.

What it really means is being so f•••ed-up in the head as to believe that one is the opposite of one's actual, biological gender sex. It's a serious mental illness. And no matter what is going on in the defective brain of a “trans woman”, it does not in any way diminish the fact that he is still a man, and not a woman, and therefore not eligible for access to facilities for actual women.

 

[jknowgood]

It's a dude no matter how you try to twist it. My gosh if one of your female loved one in a womans shelter you would want her sleeping next to a man?

How do you know that the biology is telling the brain from the womb, that it's is a dude? You don't do you? And that's the disconnect between hate and Biology. One reaches for a convenient answer in the form of hate, while the other looks to science for the answer. We know what you chose.

Get back to me when you figure out how to change ones dna. Till then **** off, real hate is putting grown men in girls locker rooms.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

him

 

[danielpalos]

I do? Why me? You were the one who said "no they are not". It wasn't me. You were the one who said "there were other forms of "fiscal policy" not me. Lol! Why should I produce a link from which I never made a claim to? You really are making a fool of yourself now.

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics?


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Our fiscal policy isnt command economics. Not yet anyways. Not with bedwetters like producing.
Our fiscal policy influences our economy.
Learn the difference

Our Space Race influenced our economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Go shoot up another one, dumbass

You need a valid argument not an ad hominem.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy. That is a command economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Its a stretch of an argument but without roads and bridges, there wouldnt be near the economic activity.
80% of people who complain about socialism consider military roads and bridges basic govt functions. Without it, there would be absolutely no need for a government in the first place.. Thats why i said it was a stretch.
Its desperation.

YOu need a link to know that there are other forms of fiscial policy than "command economics"?

I do? Why me? You were the one who said "no they are not". It wasn't me. You were the one who said "there were other forms of "fiscal policy" not me. Lol! Why should I produce a link from which I never made a claim to? You really are making a fool of yourself now.

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics? Tax cuts or spending are examples of fiscal policy. And? What about them


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

 

[TNHarley]

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics?


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Our fiscal policy isnt command economics. Not yet anyways. Not with bedwetters like producing.
Our fiscal policy influences our economy.
Learn the difference

Our Space Race influenced our economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Go shoot up another one, dumbass

You need a valid argument not an ad hominem.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy. That is a command economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

I dont need a valid argument with you. You have yet to make any ******* sense daniel.
I dont think i have ever seen you discuss something on here that you actually understood.

 

[danielpalos]

your appeal to ignorance?

We have a mixed market economy.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

Should we spit roast the counselor while we discuss opposing points of view?

 

[danielpalos]

socialism is GREAT--just look at the USSR

Capitalism "died in 1929" and socialism has been bailing out capitalism ever since.

Socialism has never bailed out anything and is ok only robbing capitalists

true capitalism is nature not nurture.

 

[danielpalos]

socialism is GREAT--just look at the USSR

Capitalism "died in 1929" and socialism has been bailing out capitalism ever since.

Regardless of what thread is about, this turd is there to clog it by shilling for communism.

How many times I have to flush before you go away?

your appeal to ignorance?

We have a mixed market economy.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

And the mix is a mess which needs to be repaired by destroying the proven failure of socialist ideas.

the right wing is wasting our exorbitantly expensive superpower on frivolous policies.

 

[danielpalos]

the law is employment at will. why call kettles black.

That has nothing to do with unemployment payments dumbass. It does mean that you get payments if your employer fires you without cause. See, if your a thief at work, you don't get paid. Not enough work? Sure, get a check. A clear thought has no chance of escaping into your posts does it?

An at-will employment State must prove for-cause employment to deny or disparage compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Stop lying you have been corrected and proven wrong

You know this.

There is no natural rate of unemployment as I irrefutably proved and schooled you on in another thread

anybody can appeal to ignorance. Men can build a wall of arguments.

 

[hadit]

Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?

She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.

 

[danielpalos]

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No they are not as they cannot command anything and that does not define socialism

lol. Public sector spending is socialism. Only the right never gets it and appeal to ignorance instead of reason.

 

[danielpalos]

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Our fiscal policy isnt command economics. Not yet anyways. Not with bedwetters like producing.
Our fiscal policy influences our economy.
Learn the difference

Our Space Race influenced our economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Go shoot up another one, dumbass

You need a valid argument not an ad hominem.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy. That is a command economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

I dont need a valid argument with you. You have yet to make any ******* sense daniel.
I dont think i have ever seen you discuss something on here that you actually understood.

why should anyone believe you, if you appeal to bigotry and ignorance?

 

[TNHarley]

Our fiscal policy isnt command economics. Not yet anyways. Not with bedwetters like producing.
Our fiscal policy influences our economy.
Learn the difference

Our Space Race influenced our economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Go shoot up another one, dumbass

You need a valid argument not an ad hominem.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy. That is a command economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

I dont need a valid argument with you. You have yet to make any ******* sense daniel.
I dont think i have ever seen you discuss something on here that you actually understood.

why should anyone believe you, if you appeal to bigotry and ignorance?

Wtf are you talking about?
Your idiotic, rhetorical bullshit, has nothing to do with what i originally said to you.
Fuckin burnout

 

[danielpalos]

Our Space Race influenced our economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Go shoot up another one, dumbass

You need a valid argument not an ad hominem.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy. That is a command economy. Only the right wing, never gets it.

I dont need a valid argument with you. You have yet to make any ******* sense daniel.
I dont think i have ever seen you discuss something on here that you actually understood.

why should anyone believe you, if you appeal to bigotry and ignorance?

Wtf are you talking about?
Your idiotic, rhetorical bullshit, has nothing to do with what i originally said to you.
Fuckin burnout

i smoke two joints, and then smoke two more, merely to have high hopes and pipe dreams the right wing will have more than bigotry and appeals to ignorance.

 

[there4eyeM]

Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Fewer people.
If it had been a children's refuge and an adult arrived claiming to identify as a child (after all, we're all children, right?), could the person be unconscionably bedded with the babes?