Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,228
- 793
- 140
" A Constitutional Challenge Against The Most Egregious Abuse By US Government On Illegal Immigration Remains Absent "
* Direct And Obvious Informed Public Consent Over Sight For Not Subject By Title *
A constitutional challenge , that children born of illegals must be given citizenship from the country of origin of the mother , has not been filed .
The most egregious abuse by us government on illegal immigration is its negligence in defending the value of citizenship for us citizens , by failing to make a distinction between the negative liberties of protections and the positive liberties of endowments .
A positive liberty of endowment for citizenship is not synonymous with a negative liberty of protection , and subject to the jurisdiction clause for us 14th amendment does not apply to illegal migrants .
A migrant sojourning through the us is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system and remains a subject by title from its nation of origin , and a technical understanding is explained as follows .
If a us citizen sojourns outside of the us , the us remains responsible for protecting violations of its civil liberties , irrespective of whether the remote agency declines a responsibility to defend the constitutional protections of a us citizen in their country and without a visa .
An incentive of illegal migrants is to acquire access to us social security system by giving birth to a us citizen , and it is a principle and aggressive motivator for illegal immigration .
A legitimate public policy is available for us citizens by to relieve the us of an indemnity for which it is not constitutionally or financially responsible to support .
The most egregious abuse by us government on illegal immigration is its negligence in defending the value of citizenship for us citizens by emphasizing the value of citizenship itself .
* Direct And Obvious Informed Public Consent Over Sight For Not Subject By Title *
A constitutional challenge , that children born of illegals must be given citizenship from the country of origin of the mother , has not been filed .
The most egregious abuse by us government on illegal immigration is its negligence in defending the value of citizenship for us citizens , by failing to make a distinction between the negative liberties of protections and the positive liberties of endowments .
A positive liberty of endowment for citizenship is not synonymous with a negative liberty of protection , and subject to the jurisdiction clause for us 14th amendment does not apply to illegal migrants .
A migrant sojourning through the us is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system and remains a subject by title from its nation of origin , and a technical understanding is explained as follows .
If a us citizen sojourns outside of the us , the us remains responsible for protecting violations of its civil liberties , irrespective of whether the remote agency declines a responsibility to defend the constitutional protections of a us citizen in their country and without a visa .
An incentive of illegal migrants is to acquire access to us social security system by giving birth to a us citizen , and it is a principle and aggressive motivator for illegal immigration .
A legitimate public policy is available for us citizens by to relieve the us of an indemnity for which it is not constitutionally or financially responsible to support .
The most egregious abuse by us government on illegal immigration is its negligence in defending the value of citizenship for us citizens by emphasizing the value of citizenship itself .
Last edited:
