Zone1 Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment

Are civis etas unis sum and subject to the jurisdiction thereof clause important to us citizens ?

  • 9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 8

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 0 - No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
" Spit Spat Nothing More Than That Compelling Against Enforcing And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause Of Us 14th Amendment "

* Rhetoric Tactic Of Creating Non Issue By Ignoring The Obvious *

Haven't the births of children to wives or children of diplomats been addressed? Families here under diplomatic relations are still subject to the jurisdictions of their home countries.
Only in a literal sense that the entourage of a diplomat is in the us with a preexisting diplomatic agreement .

Any foreign potentate currently has an opportunity to seed us political institutions with agents allied for its purposes .


* In Part With Other Goals Of Brood Parasitism Despotic Socialist Populism And Carrying Capacity Gluttony *
Probably in part.

* Political Science Hobbyist Aspiring For Fame Absent Fortune Outside Of Political Legal Institutional Cliques *
So you're simply innaffective or lazy?
This forum is a jump point , and url links back to content presents an alternative challenge for relating and defending ideas , which circumvents the fee press and allows targeted access directly to public personas of political pundits who are solicited for their affluence .

There are often differences between the vocations of career one follows and other abilities in which they are also proficient .

* Disinformation Games Of Impotence Running Scared *
So then all you have is an impotent opinion, no?
The opinion of enforcing ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof , clause of us 14th amendment is not impotent , rather it is overtly obvious and greatly compelling , as non citizens remain subject to natural freedoms , unless etas unis enters into a formal diplomatic agreement to assume a subject by title of visa in us legal immigration system .

Give me the place to stand, and I shall move the earth.
Give me a place to stand and with a lever I will move the whole world.
 
Last edited:
" Spit Spat Nothing More Than That Compelling Against Enforcing And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause Of Us 14th Amendment "

* Rhetoric Tactic Of Creating Non Issue By Ignoring The Obvious *


Only in a literal sense that the entourage of a diplomat is in the us with a preexisting diplomatic agreement .

Any foreign potentate currently has an opportunity to seed us political institutions with agents allied for its purposes .


* In Part With Other Goals Of Brood Parasitism And Despotic Socialist Populism *



* Political Science Hobbyist Aspiring For Fame Outside Of Institutional Cliques *

This forum is a jump point , and url links back to content that presents a challenge and defends it , circumvents the fee press implementing targeted contact directly to public personas of political pundits targeted for their affluence .

There are often differences between the vocations of career one follows and other abilities in which they are also proficient .

* Disinformation Games Of Impotence Running Scared *

The opinion of enforcing ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof , clause of us 14th amendment s not impotent , rather it is overtly obvious and greatly compelling , as non citizens remain subject to natural freedoms , unless etas unis enter into a formal diplomatic agreement to assume a subject by title of visa in us legal immigration system .

Give me the place to stand, and I shall move the earth.
Give me a place to stand and with a lever I will move the whole world.
If you can't enforce it then how is it not impotent?
 
" Communication Overload Pending Public Informed Consent "

* All Ready Proven More Than Trite Criticism By Far *

Prove it. :dunno:
It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

—Theodore Roosevelt
Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910
 
" Communication Overload Pending Public Informed Consent "

* All Ready Proven More Than Trite Criticism By Far *


It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

—Theodore Roosevelt
Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910
How long has Teddy been dead for? Does his ghost have some capability I'm unaware of?
 
" Universal Statements Reappear Rather Than Disappear"

* Uncertain Perhaps Inspect Further *

How long has Teddy been dead for? Does his ghost have some capability I'm unaware of?
Let the man of learning, the man of lettered leisure, beware of that queer and cheap temptation to pose to himself and to others as a cynic, as the man who has outgrown emotions and beliefs, the man to whom good and evil are as one. The poorest way to face life is to face it with a sneer. There are many men who feel a kind of twisted pride in cynicism; there are many who confine themselves to criticism of the way others do what they themselves dare not even attempt. There is no more unhealthy being, no man less worthy of respect, than he who either really holds, or feigns to hold, an attitude of sneering disbelief toward all that is great and lofty, whether in achievement or in that noble effort which, even if it fails, comes second to achievement. A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticize work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life's realities—all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority, but of weakness. They mark the men unfit to bear their part painfully in the stern strife of living, who seek, in the affectation of contempt for the achievement of others, to hide from others and from themselves their own weakness. The role is easy; there is none easier, save only the role of the man who sneers alike at both criticism and performance.
 
" Universal Statements Reappear Rather Than Disappear"

* Uncertain Perhaps Inspect Further *


Let the man of learning, the man of lettered leisure, beware of that queer and cheap temptation to pose to himself and to others as a cynic, as the man who has outgrown emotions and beliefs, the man to whom good and evil are as one. The poorest way to face life is to face it with a sneer. There are many men who feel a kind of twisted pride in cynicism; there are many who confine themselves to criticism of the way others do what they themselves dare not even attempt. There is no more unhealthy being, no man less worthy of respect, than he who either really holds, or feigns to hold, an attitude of sneering disbelief toward all that is great and lofty, whether in achievement or in that noble effort which, even if it fails, comes second to achievement. A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticize work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life's realities—all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority, but of weakness. They mark the men unfit to bear their part painfully in the stern strife of living, who seek, in the affectation of contempt for the achievement of others, to hide from others and from themselves their own weakness. The role is easy; there is none easier, save only the role of the man who sneers alike at both criticism and performance.
Rhetoric isn't action.
 
" Do Not Under Estimate Far Reaching Opportunities From Social Media "

* Simplicity Of Complexity *

Rhetoric isn't action.
You have proven that not all rhetoric is action , while obviously some rhetoric is action , which depends on the compelling nature and validity of the rhetoric .

There is nothing more pathetic than those on contract by the fee press who represent invalid political science assertions and are insulated and immune from accountability of standing their ground in answering for and being held accountable for correct or incorrect assertions .

A url link back to this thread has been and will continue to be included in comments on other social media - and alliances and reader ships are only clicks away .
 
" A Subject By Title Stipulation Is Overtly Obvious For National Sovereignty "

* Here Say Like Think Due Knot Stop Goading Dogmatic Fabrications *


The scotus has not been presented with a case for coup de gra'ce against the babbling idiocy of dogma that us 14th amendment grants defacto jus soli citizenship to children born of migrants , when the migrant is not subject by title in us legal immigration system of visa .

In the words of a 2007 legal analysis of events following the Wong Kim Ark decision, "The parameters of the jus soli principle, as stated by the court in Wong Kim Ark, have never been seriously questioned by the Supreme Court, and have been accepted as dogma by lower courts."[11] A 2010 review of the history of the Citizenship Clause notes that the Wong Kim Ark decision held that the guarantee of birthright citizenship "applies to children of foreigners present on American soil" and states that the Supreme Court "has not re-examined this issue since the concept of 'illegal alien' entered the language".[12] Since the 1990s, however, controversy has arisen over the longstanding practice of granting automatic citizenship to U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, and legal scholars disagree over whether the Wong Kim Ark precedent applies when alien parents are in the country illegally.[13][14] Attempts have been made from time to time in Congress to restrict birthright citizenship, either via statutory redefinition of the term jurisdiction, or by overriding both the Wong Kim Ark ruling and the Citizenship Clause itself through an amendment to the Constitution, but no such proposal has been enacted.

Doesn't matter.. The mother may be in the US on any kind of visa or here illegally. If she is on US soil, she is subject to the jurisdiction of the US.
 
" Does Not Qualify As A Subject By Title "

* Selling Hubris To Surrogate Eighteen Years Based On Poverty Income *

Doesn't matter.. The mother may be in the US on any kind of visa or here illegally. If she is on US soil, she is subject to the jurisdiction of the US.
The woman remains a subject of her nation of origin , which is responsible for her well being , to include the granting of jus sangunis citizenship to her child and to include the costs of delivery and social subsistence through social security totalization .

 
" Working Towards More Valid Perspectives "

* Setting Clear Legal Positivism Challenge To Precedence *

Unfortunately, I can't disagree.
Clarify in us code that any reference to the term subject in us 14th amendment describes either a citizen or an individual whom is a subject by title of visa in us legal immigration system .

* Obvious Histories Of Subjects To References *

A subject of a state includes commonly understood connotations , for example :
The Chinese Exclusion Acts denied citizenship to Chinese immigrants. Moreover, by treaty no Chinese subject in the United States could become a naturalized citizen.

Being a subject to a state or nation implies a contractual obligation of the nation state to issue a retort for violations of protections against its subjects , and a function of a nation state to exercise that role of authority in civil or criminal litigation is consequent to and directly implied by the antecedent of an obligation to lawful subjects .

The term subject has been falsely overgeneralized to imply that the consequent of being able to prosecute an individual directly implies an antecedent that the individual is a lawful subject .

To be a subject of a nation or state implies that a nation state is contractually obligated to issue a retort for violations of protections against its citizens , or to issue a retort for violations of protections against non citizens whom are subjects by title of visa in its legal immigration system , and the latter is implemented through diplomatic agreements ,

When the parents of kim wong awk were allowed to lawfully enter the united states , the parents became subjects by title to the us through its us legal immigration system that was implemented through diplomatic agreement , and the court ruled correctly in granting us citizenship .

Clearly , an individual remains a subject as a citizen from its nation of origin , and a nation of origin is contractually obligated for the well being of its citizens , whether the citizen is within or outside the borders of its nation state , while a contractual obligation of a nation state to issue a retort for violations of protections against its citizens , also occurs through diplomacy when its citizens are not subjects by title of visa and sojourning in another country .

A diplomatic contract negotiates immunity from prosecution for its diplomats , and as a provision of becoming a subject by title in us legal immigration system , a traditional contingency of precaution for us national sovereignty includes that children born of a diplomat in the united states are to receive jus sanguinin citizenship .
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top