A Brilliant Analysis of Western Decline...

man had morals long before he invented religion



So.....exactly how old are you?


Can a human being be good without reference to God? Sure….there could be good pagans….or bad religious folks. But God is necessary for morality to survive. Take as an example, a sadist who gets satisfaction from murdering children. If there is no God who declares that such an act is wrong, then my arguing such is simply my opinion versus that of the murderer. Without God, good and evil are a matter of taste.

So where the hell was God at Auschvitz? You people constantly talk like your Diety is going to take care of all, when in fact, it takes care of nothing.

This is earth, where bad things happen. It won't remain that way for long. But for now that is the way it is until Christ returns to restore the Eden we started out with.
For now Satan has dominion. It is what Satan gained when Adam lost it. So for a time powers and principalities are in control. Christ will resolve that situation upon His return.

As for our Father, first He redeemed their souls through Christ's work on the cross, then He carried them home on His shoulders. When they succumbed, He took them to paradise and replaced their pain with joy.
He doesn't interfere with man's inhumanity to man. But He is faithful to clean up our messes. Ann Frank is alive and well and sitting at the knee of her Father, talking and singing and making noise.

This life is only a vapor of the totality of our existence. We live on forever. Blink and you will have realized the extent of how much of it we spend here in earthly clay. We hold on to this life for dear life. But to God it's just a moment until we are safe in His arms.
 
This morn, a poster did this victory chant:
".....you got your ass kicked in New York City, in Virginia, and on 6Nov12. With this kind of nonsense, may well get it kicked again Nov14, as well as Nov16."

Hard for me to recognize how many don't realize that they are witnessing...and assisting....in the death of this great society.



For my lights, Western Civilization began to die when the French Revolution made its aim replacing religion with reason, mindless of the fact that reason, or science, have no moral basis. As such, the French Revolution became the template for every bloody totalitarian dictatorship in the modern world.






1. But one of my fav thinkers, Camille Paglia, has an insightful take on the matter...." But no subject gets her going more than when I ask if she really sees a connection between society's attempts to paper over the biological distinction between men and women and the collapse of Western civilization.

2. .... pointing to the diminished status of military service. "The entire elite class now, in finance, in politics and so on, none of them have military service—hardly anyone, there are a few. But there is no prestige attached to it anymore. That is a recipe for disaster,"...

a. .... people don't think in military ways, so there's this illusion out there that people are basically nice, people are basically kind, if we're just nice and benevolent to everyone they'll be nice too.

[May I interject that that is the exact distinction between the American Revolution, and the French!
America's Founders believed no such thing, and that is the reason we have checks and balances.]




4. Ms. Paglia argues that the softening of modern American society begins as early as kindergarten.
"Primary-school education is a crock, basically. It's oppressive to anyone with physical energy, especially guys," she says,... does everything in its power to turn boys into neuters.".... Almost one in five high-school-age boys has been diagnosed with ADHD, boys get worse grades than girls and are less likely to go to college.

a. She sees the tacit elevation of "female values"—such as sensitivity, socialization and cooperation—as the main aim of teachers, rather than fostering creative energy and teaching hard geographical and historical facts.

5. "This PC gender politics thing—the way gender is being taught in the universities—in a very anti-male way, it's all about neutralization of maleness." The result: Upper-middle-class men who are "intimidated" and "can't say anything. . . . They understand the agenda." In other words: They avoid goring certain sacred cows by "never telling the truth to women" ...

6. A key part of the remedy, she believes, is a "revalorization" of traditional male trades—the ones that allow women's studies professors to drive to work (roads), take the elevator to their office (construction), read in the library (electricity), and go to gender-neutral restrooms (plumbing).

a. " Michelle Obama's going on: 'Everybody must have college.' Why? Why? What is the reason why everyone has to go to college? Especially when college is so utterly meaningless right now, it has no core curriculum" and "people end up saddled with huge debts," ......





7. ... iconoclastic women of the 1930s, like Earhart and Katharine Hepburn, remain her ideal feminist role models: independent, brave, enterprising, capable of competing with men without bashing them. But since at least the late 1960s, she says, fellow feminists in the academy stopped sharing her vision of "equal-opportunity feminism" that demands a level playing field without demanding special quotas or protections for women.

a. there was the time she "barely got through the dinner" with a group of women's studies professors at Bennington College, where she had her first teaching job, who insisted that there is no hormonal difference between men and women. "I left before dessert."






8. .... these ideological excesses bear much of the blame for the current cultural decline. She calls out activists like Gloria Steinem, Naomi Wolf and Susan Faludi for pushing a version of feminism that says gender is nothing more than a social construct, and groups like the National Organization for Women for making abortion the singular women's issue..... and falsely promised that women could "have it all." And by impugning women who chose to forgo careers to stay at home with children, feminists turned off many who might have happily joined their ranks.




9. ... "I want every 14-year-old girl . . . to be told: You better start thinking what do you want in life. If you just want a career and no children you don't have much to worry about. If, however, you are thinking you'd like to have children some day you should start thinking about when do you want to have them. Early or late? To have them early means you are going to make a career sacrifice, but you're going to have more energy and less risks.

10. To save feminism as a political movement from irrelevance, Ms. Paglia says, the women's movement should return to its roots. That means abandoning the "nanny state" mentality that led to politically correct speech codes and college disciplinary committees that have come to replace courts.
The movement can win converts, she says, but it needs to become a big tent, one "open to stay-at-home moms" and "not just the career woman."
The Weekend Interview With Camille Paglia: A Feminist Defense of Masculine Virtues - WSJ.com




If only men could, once again, be men.....not some ObamaCare incarnation like 'pajama boy.'

Who wrote this article? Glenn Beck?

Crazy rightwing thinking: "it sounds like it makes sense, so it must be true. We don't need actual facts to confirm it."
 
Last edited:
I played Candyland when I was a kid. I bought Strangers and Dangers for my kids......

Do you suppose that nobody was abducted/molested by priests/whatnot when you were a kid? Or has all that been only happened since 1948 (when 'McCollum v. Board of Education' was decided) ? :eusa_eh:
 
man had morals long before he invented religion



So.....exactly how old are you?


Can a human being be good without reference to God? Sure….there could be good pagans….or bad religious folks. But God is necessary for morality to survive. Take as an example, a sadist who gets satisfaction from murdering children. If there is no God who declares that such an act is wrong, then my arguing such is simply my opinion versus that of the murderer. Without God, good and evil are a matter of taste.

Fallacy. I shouldn't need to explain further, but I will anyway:

"This is what the LORD of Heaven's Armies has declared: I have decided to settle accounts with the nation of Amalek for opposing Israel when they came from Egypt. Now go and completely destroy the entire Amalekite nation--men, women, children, babies, cattle, sheep, goats, camels, and donkeys."
-- 1 Samuel 15:2-3
 
man had morals long before he invented religion



So.....exactly how old are you?


Can a human being be good without reference to God? Sure….there could be good pagans….or bad religious folks. But God is necessary for morality to survive. Take as an example, a sadist who gets satisfaction from murdering children. If there is no God who declares that such an act is wrong, then my arguing such is simply my opinion versus that of the murderer. Without God, good and evil are a matter of taste.

Ever hear of the rule of Law? The reason murder is wrong in a pluralistic society is that the majority says it's wrong and requires punishment. This is why Civil Law MUST trump Religious Law whenever the two come in to conflict.

When we stand around waiting for God to punish the evildoers, we get institutionalized greed, perverted clergy and slavery on an industrial scale. :eusa_hand: Pass!
 
Boy. When you consider Old Rocks, Avg Joe, Agit8r, NYcarbineer and Billy000, one really does have to "suffer the fools" just to try to eek out an existence on this planet.

Constantly demanding God do exactly as they expect or they refuse to believe in him. No matter the evidence is all around. No matter they are clueless what happens to them when they die, or even worse, think they will be cease to exist. What inane retorts.
 
why do US cons make such shitty Christians?

Right-wing + Christian is a bad combination:

"In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before - the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech in Munich (April 12, 1922)

"I am also religious, profoundly religious on the inside, and I believe that Providence weighs human beings. Those who do not pass the trials imposed by Providence, who are broken by them, are not destined by Providence for greater things. It is a natural necessity that only the strong remain after this selection."
-- Adolf Hitler; from Munich Löwenbräukeller (November 8, 1943)
Actually, Hitler and the Nazi's were "Left" wing National Socialists. ... :cool:
 
Yep, you hate the public sector and expect the private to treat people right without regulations. Who's the fool now?


Oh, the straw man arguments that pollute conversation.

Matthew, would you like to point out where anyone is saying that businesses should operate "without regulations"?

Can you provide an example of a point in time in this country where there were no business regulations?

No significant problems can be fixed until people are honest in their discourse.

.
 
why do US cons make such shitty Christians?

Right-wing + Christian is a bad combination:

"In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before - the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech in Munich (April 12, 1922)

"I am also religious, profoundly religious on the inside, and I believe that Providence weighs human beings. Those who do not pass the trials imposed by Providence, who are broken by them, are not destined by Providence for greater things. It is a natural necessity that only the strong remain after this selection."
-- Adolf Hitler; from Munich Löwenbräukeller (November 8, 1943)
Actually, Hitler and the Nazi's were "Left" wing National Socialists. ... :cool:

lol, wow. not even close: http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf :eusa_hand:
 
There isn't a nickel's worth of difference between 'Left wing' Communism and National Socialism.

Both have a ruling elite and the central government basically owns and controls everything.

And all citizens are vassals to the state and it's government apparatus. ... :cool:
 
If only men could, once again, be men.....not some ObamaCare incarnation like 'pajama boy.'

The corporate state LOVEs emasculated males.

Note that now women are doing far better than men in climbing the corporate ladder?


Corporations do not want original thinkers, they do not people who question authority, they do not want people who think we can attain a better outcome by debate OR CONFLICT ...

CORPORATIONS WANT OBLIGING TOOLS.
 
the central government basically owns and controls everything.

I see you did not read the link. :rolleyes: Obviously the government did not own all the stuff that they PRIVATIZED!

like social services, for instance:

"The Winterhilfswerk... was to call on the Volk to help itself. We could have done things differently. Instead of appealing to the Volk's willingness to sacrifice, we could have directed our appeal to the taxpayer. We consciously and deliberately did not do so because we wanted to educate the German Volk to come together in this common sacrifice, and therein to begin to understand the nature of the community; to comprehend the duties this community demands of us and to satisfy these of our own free accord without relying on the taxpayer."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech at Berlin Sportpalast (October 10, 1939)
 
the central government basically owns and controls everything.

I see you did not read the link. :rolleyes: Obviously the government did not own all the stuff that they PRIVATIZED!

like social services, for instance:
That's why it was called National 'Socialism' and not National 'Communism'.

Because the Nazis did allow some capitalism and privatization......much like communist China does today.

Socialism is just Communism lite. ..... :cool:
 
And that's why men created the very idea of the economy and corporation.

lol

Must be nice having a government mandate to force AA for certain groups on businesses. At least we didn't cheat like many of the special groups did.
 
College a waste of time? Sorry, its one's only shot at the middle class otherwise one ends up working for some lousy place for low wages for too long.
 
The Decline of the West is the direct result of open borders and other so-called progressive ideas. All barriers of a moral code have been eradicated in lieu of non judgmental drivel, leading directly to the breakdown of the family, rampant sexual freedom and the dilution of cultural norms.
 
Yep, you hate the public sector and expect the private to treat people right without regulations. Who's the fool now?


Oh, the straw man arguments that pollute conversation.

Matthew, would you like to point out where anyone is saying that businesses should operate "without regulations"?

Can you provide an example of a point in time in this country where there were no business regulations?

No significant problems can be fixed until people are honest in their discourse.

.

the right in this country has repeatedly backed deregulation that once in place screwed the people .


everyone who knows politics KNOWS this is the truth.


Your the party of deregulation for deregulations sake.

Its has HURT this country every time you talked us into it.

HISTORICALLY FAILED IDEAS


why should we listen to you again?
 
The Decline of the West is the direct result of open borders and other so-called progressive ideas. All barriers of a moral code have been eradicated in lieu of non judgmental drivel, leading directly to the breakdown of the family, rampant sexual freedom and the dilution of cultural norms.

so you want laws about moral codes?

you want laws about SEX????


not very freedomy of you now is it.

BTW you will NEVER be allowed to FORCE your religious morals on the rest of us.

try to grow the hell up and live in reality
 
The Decline of the West is the direct result of open borders and other so-called progressive ideas. All barriers of a moral code have been eradicated in lieu of non judgmental drivel, leading directly to the breakdown of the family, rampant sexual freedom and the dilution of cultural norms.

so you want laws about moral codes?

you want laws about SEX????


not very freedomy of you now is it.

BTW you will NEVER be allowed to FORCE your religious morals on the rest of us.

try to grow the hell up and live in reality

I think there is a name for that, actually: Godwin's Law Review: Public Morality
 

Forum List

Back
Top