The judges of the 9th circuit are obligated to honor the Constitution.
Anyone disagree?
Put another way....if they do not, they are a priori, corrupt. Hence, if it can be shown that to rule against the Trump foreign policy executive order is in opposition to the law of the land, the United States Constitution....then any judge who so rules need be removed from his position.
Here is the Constitution on the matter.
1. "While the State of Washington sues President Trump over refugee visas, we will have a weather eye out for the part of the Constitution known as Article IV, Section 4.
2. Much of the Constitution is given over to listing what the government, and in some instances, the states, can not do. It is only in Article IV, Section 4 that the Constitution sets down things that the United States must do.
3. ....the obligations clauses.
The first says that the United States “shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” The wording doesn’t denote the Republican Party (which didn’t exist at the time the Constitution was framed) but rather representative government, as opposed to, say, a monarchy.
4. This is followed by a clause that says that the United States “shall protect” each of the states “against Invasion.” The government has no choice in the matter. It shall protect the states against invasion.
5. ....Trump is not merely permitted to impose the travel restrictions that have landed him in court but is actually required to pursue them....
6. ....countless threats from the Islamic State and al-Qaeda to secret their agents among the refugees fleeing the war zones constitute evidence that an invasion is underway?
7. ....among others, France and Germany — has seen enough of the tactics of the Islamic State and Al-Qaeada to know their penchant not only for terror but for surprise.
8. In any event, who, under the Constitution, gets to define an invasion and determine that Article IV Section 4 needs to be invoked?
9. So who gets to decided this question? The Congress? The Courts? The President? How about the Reverend Clergy or the Press?
10 . It strikes us as at least logical — and constitutional — that in such a question the president, who operates our spy services and is commander-in-chief, counts for something."Article IV, Section 4 - The New York Sun
Which way will the 9th Circuit go???
Honor their oaths and obligations.....or their loyalty to the religion of Liberalism.
We live in interesting times.
Anyone disagree?
Put another way....if they do not, they are a priori, corrupt. Hence, if it can be shown that to rule against the Trump foreign policy executive order is in opposition to the law of the land, the United States Constitution....then any judge who so rules need be removed from his position.
Here is the Constitution on the matter.
1. "While the State of Washington sues President Trump over refugee visas, we will have a weather eye out for the part of the Constitution known as Article IV, Section 4.
2. Much of the Constitution is given over to listing what the government, and in some instances, the states, can not do. It is only in Article IV, Section 4 that the Constitution sets down things that the United States must do.
3. ....the obligations clauses.
The first says that the United States “shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” The wording doesn’t denote the Republican Party (which didn’t exist at the time the Constitution was framed) but rather representative government, as opposed to, say, a monarchy.
4. This is followed by a clause that says that the United States “shall protect” each of the states “against Invasion.” The government has no choice in the matter. It shall protect the states against invasion.
5. ....Trump is not merely permitted to impose the travel restrictions that have landed him in court but is actually required to pursue them....
6. ....countless threats from the Islamic State and al-Qaeda to secret their agents among the refugees fleeing the war zones constitute evidence that an invasion is underway?
7. ....among others, France and Germany — has seen enough of the tactics of the Islamic State and Al-Qaeada to know their penchant not only for terror but for surprise.
8. In any event, who, under the Constitution, gets to define an invasion and determine that Article IV Section 4 needs to be invoked?
9. So who gets to decided this question? The Congress? The Courts? The President? How about the Reverend Clergy or the Press?
10 . It strikes us as at least logical — and constitutional — that in such a question the president, who operates our spy services and is commander-in-chief, counts for something."Article IV, Section 4 - The New York Sun
Which way will the 9th Circuit go???
Honor their oaths and obligations.....or their loyalty to the religion of Liberalism.
We live in interesting times.
