And there is a very good reason why they totally strip down buildings before they implode them. Non-load bearing walls, furniture, equipment, etc would disrupt the explosions and risk the building toppling instead of collapsing.
I also have to laugh at the memes people post saying that jet fuel can't melt steel beams. They are right but the extreme prolonged heat weakens them and they carry a whole lot of weight. Those two factors equal collapse. It's not rocket science.
Do you see the jet fuel still burning?. Oh check it out its cold enough for a woman to walk around
And what do you think that proves?
It proves your no welder....as you claim.. How the fuck could she walk in there if it was so hot it was bending steel?
The fuel cascaded to a lower level and that is where the heat built up to weaken the steel beams. There were localized fires on the floors that were hit, but the hundreds of thousands of pounds of fuel didn't stay on those floors. It pooled at a lower level and burned. The heat got high enough to turn the steel beams orange hot, not enough to melt them, but just getting them that hot dropped their strength by at least 25%, and that was all that was needed based on the design of the building.
WTC2
Molten metal.. It's also in that video above from the firemen
Yes, that's one of the localized fires I mentioned. The jet fuel fire was a inferno far more powerful than that.