63 Million

What? Why would we need to "replace" unwanted zygotes from 50 years ago? The planet is stressed enough as it is.

How Does Overpopulation Affect Sustainability? Challenges and Solutions​


There is no "overpopulation."
 
Yes, this is a switch for InItForMe. His answer to people being unable to afford what they want - be it a house, or a stay-at-home mom - is for employers to just pay more. Often he’s come up with ridiculous amounts for unskilled jobs that a teen could do.

This is the first time I’ve heard him acknowledge that people are responsible for their own situations.

I also agree with him that 30, or late 20s, should be the time to start a family. By then, you’ve been working for 8 - 10 years, have moved beyond entry-level pay, and could have saved a decent amount.
Your last paragraph is what will get alot of pushback. Many here advocate for findi g a mate early and having kids in ones early 20s. Why? Its hard to fathom.
 
There would be millions more Americans today if it wasn't for democrats sacrificing babies to Moloch and harvesting them for blood and organs.
 
I blame the democraps for pushing the feminist movement that ruined the traditional family and the economy. In retrospect, women are more miserable today than they were in the 60's.
 
Birth rates are dropping all around the world.

To sustain a stable population, the birth rate needs to be 2.1 children per female. If the replacement rate drops below 2.1, serious economic problems begin to occur. For example, the ratio of active workers to retirees shrinks, resulting in a greater tax burden on workers to support the elderly. We are down to 2.7 workers per Social Security recipient and are facing bankrupty of the Social Security system in a few short years.

The United States birth rate was 3.65 in 1960. It has declined steadily to the present rate of 1.62. There is no evidence this trend will change.

Since Roe v. Wade, America has killed 63 million fetuses in the womb. This would have reversed the declining birth rate necessary to sustain our population.

I was watching a video about declining birth rates last night, when my wife said, "We should outlaw abortion."

One of many reasons I married her.

The country with the lowest birth rate is South Korea. They stand at a shocking 0.73.

They are followed by Hong Kong at 0.78, Singapore, Taiwan, and Macau at 1.2.

China really shot themselve in the face with their One Child Policy and stand at 1.0. They have repealed the One Child Policy for that reason.

Abortion is legal in all these countries, although in South Korea it has only been legal since 2019.

Fox News viewers will be pleased to hear the countries with the highest birth rates are Chad at 9.4, Somalia at 9.1, Congo at 5.9, the Central African Republic at 5.81, and Niger at 5.79.

Fox News viewers will also be pleased to hear those countries do not top the list of countries with the highest death rates. Not even close.


The United States is only just now pondering what to do about our low birth rate. Tucker Carlson believes shining red light on your balls will solve the problem. I kid you not.

Other countries, especially in Asia, have been working on this problem for a long time. Cash incentives and so forth. All attempts have failed.


There is one other solution aside from banning abortion which is guaranteed to be successful.


Immigration. Lots of immigration.

We have 63 million unborn to replace.




Not enuf kids being born??? Listen up bub and I'm only going to tell you this once! Few can afford kids except the rich and illegals, bub. In the old days granny was around to look after kids...for free. Now it is thousands of $$ per month to look after each kid in some locales. When I went to school in the '70's, L.A.C.C. was $6.50 a semester. Cal State L.A. was $63 a trimester. Take all the classes you want for that one fee + used books. Point is...kids are $$ nowadays. You can't get a 4-year degree for a couple thousand $ any longer, bub.

Many people can't afford kids or even afford rent. The rich are out of touch to the highest degree. They want everyone to have kids to keep the Ponzi scheme going. Yet the rich and filthy politicians squeeze people to death. It is akin to saying the USA will deindustrialize, send all our high paying jobs overseas...now go buy $750,000 houses and $60,000 cars on your barista salary.

And even if money is not an issue, the powerful have created an ugly world to live in and bring kids into. America used to be a dream life...but the dream has turned into a nightmare. Add testosterone depletion, trans and queer indoctrination, radical feminists, war on family, yada-yada and it is a perfect storm for exterminating America. That's the score, bub.

Soros & John McCain.webp
 
I blame the democraps for pushing the feminist movement that ruined the traditional family and the economy. In retrospect, women are more miserable today than they were in the 60's.
They’re certainly more stressed. Back in the 60s, a woman was able to enjoy a house provided by her husband’s salary, and who just had to get the kids off to school - and then had the entire day to do a couple of loads of laundry and prepare dinner, and once a week or so do a grocery run. There was plenty of time for woman to gather for a mid-afternoon “coffee-klatsch,’ and many took an exercise class a couple of times a week. Evenings were for relaxing in front of the TV.

Now, they have to get the kids ready for school while they themselves get ready for work, put in 8 hours with demanding bosses and deadlines and annoying co-workers, and then stop off on the way home to pick the kids up at after-school day care, and THEN first get home and get a dinner together. Then, in the evenings, get a couple of loads of laundry done, and maybe finally settle in for an hour or so of TV.

Women definitely had it easier. The question is: were they happier?
 
We need 100 million Muslim 15-30 yr old men to come in. That'll fix it.

Don't laugh. That's Enngland leadership now. That's Europe now. African or Arab muzzlim. The more the better. Free everything!!!!!
 
Women definitely had it easier. The question is: were they happier?
Well, women maybe weren't that happy in the 60's but they sure seem miserable today and are drugged out on anti-depressants and other anti-psychotics. Maybe women just aren't capable of being happy? (Just kiddin'!) Anyway, my wife has a Ph.D. and gave up her research to be a stay at home mom and never regretted anything.
 
I blame the democraps for pushing the feminist movement that ruined the traditional family and the economy. In retrospect, women are more miserable today than they were in the 60's.

Hogwash. The nation has created an economic situation where it takes 2 middle class salaries to just hang on. That has zero to do with feminism. Prices arent going to come down. The traditional family is decreasing due to economic conditions. Both parties should accept blame.
 
Your assertion is given all the credit it deserves considering it is your unsubstantiated opinion. IOW, none.

Your information is out of date. Stop clinging to false hysteria.
 
Back
Top Bottom