62% of 18-29 Year Olds Have a Favorable View of Socialism

These are stories you tell to hide your acceptance of murder.
I do not accept murder. Nevertheless, it is not clear to that milder efforts could have prepared Russia for the German invasion. Maybe they would have. We will never know. We do know that the efforts of the Soviet Union were instrumental in defeating Nazi Germany.
 
PoliticalChic, your use of insults and name calling Do not make your perspective more persuasive.

On the basis of my reasonably extensive study of the writings of Karl Marx I think he had two valid insights and that he was mistaken about everything else.

I have also read Vladimir Lenin and disagree with him about everything. You seem to agree with him.

As a political movement and philosophy socialism existed before Communism. Marx criticized it in The Communist Manifesto:

"Thus, in 1847, socialism was a middle-class movement, communism a working-class movement. Socialism was, on the Continent at least, “respectable”; communism was the very opposite. And as our notion, from the very beginning, was that “the emancipation of the workers must be the act of the working class itself,” there could be no doubt as to which of the two names we must take. Moreover, we have, ever since, been far from repudiating it."

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

The closest approximation to democratic socialism that has worked is Scandinavian Social Democracy. In Scandinavia there is a mixed economy with a well financed public sector of the economy that is paid for by steeply progressive taxation. The public sector includes socialized medicine. Countries with socialized medicine spend less per capita than the United States on health care. they get better results.

There is no possibility of a Communist dictatorship emerging in Scandinavia. Communist dictatorships emerge when capitalist dictatorships have failed.
Nothing will persuade mentally co-opted like you.


BTW.....your vaunted communism?

Guess what happened on this date>



The Berlin Wall fell on 9 November 1989 during the Peaceful Revolution, marking the beginning of the destruction of the figurative Iron Curtain, as East Berlin transit restrictions were overwhelmed and discarded. Sections of the wall were breached, and planned deconstruction began the following June. Wikipedia
Date: November 9, 1989
Location: Berlin Wall, East Berlin
 
PoliticalChic, your use of insults and name calling Do not make your perspective more persuasive.

On the basis of my reasonably extensive study of the writings of Karl Marx I think he had two valid insights and that he was mistaken about everything else.

I have also read Vladimir Lenin and disagree with him about everything. You seem to agree with him.

As a political movement and philosophy socialism existed before Communism. Marx criticized it in The Communist Manifesto:

"Thus, in 1847, socialism was a middle-class movement, communism a working-class movement. Socialism was, on the Continent at least, “respectable”; communism was the very opposite. And as our notion, from the very beginning, was that “the emancipation of the workers must be the act of the working class itself,” there could be no doubt as to which of the two names we must take. Moreover, we have, ever since, been far from repudiating it."

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

The closest approximation to democratic socialism that has worked is Scandinavian Social Democracy. In Scandinavia there is a mixed economy with a well financed public sector of the economy that is paid for by steeply progressive taxation. The public sector includes socialized medicine. Countries with socialized medicine spend less per capita than the United States on health care. they get better results.

There is no possibility of a Communist dictatorship emerging in Scandinavia. Communist dictatorships emerge when capitalist dictatorships have failed.
Every day and in every way you demonstrate being a fool


“Speaking at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen told students that he had “absolutely no wish to interfere the presidential debate in the US” but nonetheless attempted to set the record straight about his country.



"I know that some people in the US associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy,” Rasmussen said.



“The Nordic model is an expanded welfare state which provides a high level of security for its citizens, but it is also a successful market economy with much freedom to pursue your dreams and live your life as you wish,” he added.

The PM’s comments come after US presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton used part of the first Democratic debate to discuss how the United States could emulate Scandinavia.” Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist



Check out the rankings of economic freedom, here: Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom



Capitalism makes countries wealthy…..socialism redistributes wealth, shutting down industry in the process.

“The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.” Dennis Prager





Nordic countries have high levels of social services, but this is paid for by exorbitant tax rates. Denmark has a 63% tax rate, plus a 25% sales tax.

And….a 5.5% decline in GDP in the decade.
Opinion | Something Not Rotten in Denmark (Published 2015)



“The welfare state we have is excellent in most ways,” says Gunnar Viby Mogensen, a Danish historian. “We only have this little problem. We can’t afford it.”

www.economist.com



The Nordic countries are reinventing their model of capitalism, says Adrian Wooldridge
www.economist.com


www.economist.com
 
Nothing will persuade mentally co-opted like you.


BTW.....your vaunted communism?

Guess what happened on this date>



The Berlin Wall fell on 9 November 1989 during the Peaceful Revolution, marking the beginning of the destruction of the figurative Iron Curtain, as East Berlin transit restrictions were overwhelmed and discarded. Sections of the wall were breached, and planned deconstruction began the following June. Wikipedia
Date: November 9, 1989
Location: Berlin Wall, East Berlin
I was glad when the Berlin Wall fell too.
 
I was glad when the Berlin Wall fell too.
That makes you a double-dunce: those are the walls your ideology installed.


Let's put you in perspective:

First base: Democrat Socialists, you singing the Internationale

Second base: Socialists, Mamdani and the Democrat Party

Third base: Bolsheviks

Home plate: eliminating any who don't proclaim Marx the aim of society.
 
Every day and in every way you demonstrate being a fool


“Speaking at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen told students that he had “absolutely no wish to interfere the presidential debate in the US” but nonetheless attempted to set the record straight about his country.



"I know that some people in the US associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy,” Rasmussen said.



“The Nordic model is an expanded welfare state which provides a high level of security for its citizens, but it is also a successful market economy with much freedom to pursue your dreams and live your life as you wish,” he added.

The PM’s comments come after US presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton used part of the first Democratic debate to discuss how the United States could emulate Scandinavia.” Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist



Check out the rankings of economic freedom, here: Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom



Capitalism makes countries wealthy…..socialism redistributes wealth, shutting down industry in the process.

“The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.” Dennis Prager





Nordic countries have high levels of social services, but this is paid for by exorbitant tax rates. Denmark has a 63% tax rate, plus a 25% sales tax.

And….a 5.5% decline in GDP in the decade.
Opinion | Something Not Rotten in Denmark (Published 2015)



“The welfare state we have is excellent in most ways,” says Gunnar Viby Mogensen, a Danish historian. “We only have this little problem. We can’t afford it.”

www.economist.com



The Nordic countries are reinventing their model of capitalism, says Adrian Wooldridge
www.economist.com


www.economist.com
The choice between capitalism and socialism is not binary but analog. All modern economies have aspects of each. Denmark is more socialist than the United States. Denmark has socialized medicine. Countries with socialized medicine get better results than the American system of health care for less money per capita.
 
That makes you a double-dunce: those are the walls your ideology installed.


Let's put you in perspective:

First base: Democrat Socialists, you singing the Internationale

Second base: Socialists, Mamdani and the Democrat Party

Third base: Bolsheviks

Home plate: eliminating any who don't proclaim Marx the aim of society.
You are committing the slippery slope fallacy. In the slippery slope fallacy, one claims a chain of causation that may not exist. Those who make popular and peaceful reform impossible, as you seem to desire, make violent revolution more likely.

Democratic socialism is becoming more popular because real incomes adjusted for inflation for most Americans are declining as the number of millionaires and billionaires increases.

Capitalism will only be popular when most Americans experience steady improvements in their standards of living.

--------------

AI Overview



The
slippery slope fallacy is a logical error that occurs when someone argues that a relatively small, initial action will inevitably lead to a chain reaction of related events, culminating in a significant and often extreme or undesirable outcome, without providing sufficient evidence for that connection.

Key Characteristics
  • Unsubstantiated Chain Reaction: The argument assumes a succession of events will occur without proving the causal link or likelihood between each step.
  • Reliance on Speculation: Instead of evidence, the argument often relies on fear, exaggeration, or speculation to persuade the audience.
  • Ignores Alternatives: The fallacy ignores the possibility that the situation could stop at an earlier, reasonable point or that other outcomes are possible.

  • Google Search
 
Last edited:
The choice between capitalism and socialism is not binary but analog. All modern economies have aspects of each. Denmark is more socialist than the United States. Denmark has socialized medicine. Countries with socialized medicine get better results than the American system of health care for less money per capita.


liar

You chose socialism.


And you favor it even though it slaughters human beings.


“….Communism enabled the Soviet Union to industrialize rapidly enough to produce the weapons that enabled the Soviet Union to defeat the Nazi invasion. The vast majority of German casualties were on the Russian front.

Communism enabled Communist China to produce the best consumer goods at the lowest prices. “

62% of 18-29 Year Olds Have a Favorable View of Socialism post #264



You are accepting 65 million human beings slaughtered.


One can only wonder how you were brought up.
 
You are committing the slippery slope fallacy.

--------------

AI Overview



The
slippery slope fallacy is a logical error that occurs when someone argues that a relatively small, initial action will inevitably lead to a chain reaction of related events, culminating in a significant and often extreme or undesirable outcome, without providing sufficient evidence for that connection.

Key Characteristics
  • Unsubstantiated Chain Reaction: The argument assumes a succession of events will occur without proving the causal link or likelihood between each step.
  • Reliance on Speculation: Instead of evidence, the argument often relies on fear, exaggeration, or speculation to persuade the audience.
  • Ignores Alternatives: The fallacy ignores the possibility that the situation could stop at an earlier, reasonable point or that other outcomes are possible.

  • Google Search
Did you write this?

“….Communism enabled the Soviet Union to industrialize rapidly enough to produce the weapons that enabled the Soviet Union to defeat the Nazi invasion. The vast majority of German casualties were on the Russian front.

Communism enabled Communist China to produce the best consumer goods at the lowest prices. “

62% of 18-29 Year Olds Have a Favorable View of Socialism post #264



You are accepting 65 million human beings slaughtered.
 
Just an observation based on the responses to the last two posts......one moron posts "funny" and the other "disgree."

Disagree? even though I provided his own words.

The other finds the slaughter of millions of human beings "funny.


What does this tell you about government schooling, and the control of same by the Democrat Party?
 
Did you write this?

“….Communism enabled the Soviet Union to industrialize rapidly enough to produce the weapons that enabled the Soviet Union to defeat the Nazi invasion. The vast majority of German casualties were on the Russian front.

Communism enabled Communist China to produce the best consumer goods at the lowest prices. “

62% of 18-29 Year Olds Have a Favorable View of Socialism post #264



You are accepting 65 million human beings slaughtered.
I wrote that o point out that it cannot be proved that Communism has never succeeded at anything. I wish that the Soviet victory over the Nazi invasion and the Communist Chinese development of a successful economy had been achieved with less suffering, but we will never know.

We do know that the Soviet effort in World War II was necessary to defeat Nazi Germany, and that the best consumer products at the lowest prices are often made in Communist China.
 
I wrote that o point out that it cannot be proved that Communism has never succeeded at anything. I wish that the Soviet victory over the Nazi invasion and the Communist Chinese development of a successful economy had been achieved with less suffering, but we will never know.

We do know that the Soviet effort in World War II was necessary to defeat Nazi Germany, and that the best consumer products at the lowest prices are often made in Communist China.
1. What we know is that fools .....raise your paw.....still defend the indefensible. But you are only 12, so you still have time to learn.

2. Clearly you know very little about the war.

The Soviet Union provided natural resources to Nazi Germany until June of 1941.
Who was more evil, Hitler, or his facilitator and ally, who provided natural resources that Germany lacked, taught him how to build concentration camps, attacked other nations in coordination with Hitler,....

....and killed far more of his own citizens than Hitler did.


3. "....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence (comment)




4. "Between June 22, 1941, and January 31, 1942, the Germans had lost 6,000 airplanes and more than 3,200 tanks and similar vehicles; and no less than 918,000 men had been killed, wounded, or gone missing in action, amounting to 28.7 percent of the average strength of the army, namely, 3,2 million men.[33]

(In the Soviet Union, Germany would lose no less than 10 million of its total 13.5 million men killed, wounded, or taken prisoner during the entire war; and the Red Army would end up claiming credit for 90 per cent of all Germans killed in the Second World War.)
Clive Ponting, 'Armageddon: The Second World War,' p. 130; Stephen E. Ambrose 'Americans at War,' p. 72. ”



A good book....worth reading

1762727401331.webp
 
As usual, you Marxies have it exactly backwards. Businesses are bailed out all the time by capital investors. Socialists will use taxpayer money to bail out a business and give ownership to the government.
Like Trump investing in companies.
 
What country's schools did you graduate from, Comrade?
King's College, founded in 1754

Known today as Columbia University.


I bet you can figure out where it is.

Now.....when you left Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Clown College, did they give you a diploma or just that big red nose?
 
15th post
97% of the people support some aspect of socialism.

I point out often that the taxpayers bailing out failed business has nothing to do with capitalism but still a large segment of people support it.
Nobody who lives under the boot of communism supports it.
It's the only type of government that needs to build walls to keep people from leaving
 
King's College, founded in 1754

Known today as Columbia University.


I bet you can figure out where it is.

Now.....when you left Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Clown College, did they give you a diploma or just that big red nose?
Yeah, he prolly got these too!

1762736862846.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom