500,000 unemployed vets

Who's fault is it?

  • The vets

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • The companies that aren't hiring them

    Votes: 5 50.0%
  • Obama's

    Votes: 3 30.0%

  • Total voters
    10
You should stick to sports. You suck at talking about that too but at least you stay in the lane you can handle.

And you should stick to your drug dealing and tax evasion because you suck on politics and every other subject. You started the insults and if you expect me to take it from you and not fight back you are wrong.

Have a good day.
Fuck off. I did not. I backed you into an intellectual corner and you had to resort to falling back on this personal conversation you keep trying to fall back on. As if me selling weed discredits anything I say. I only find you not a douchebag on sports talk issues. Go back in your lane you mental midget. I don't want to go off on a little bitch fight with you.

Your first response to me had an attack, not my issue that you are a nut job.

You asked in your poll if it was Obama's fault, the liberals say it is his recovery and is going well. If it is Obama's recovery does he only take credit for the good and not the bad?

This is an issue that BOTH parties have ignored, anyone with a brain knows that. Democrats and Republicans for decades have had the chance to fix the veterans issues and have ignored it.

Business should not be required to hire a vet, however since they defended our country maybe a company that hires them should get a tax incentive for hiring them. Our company will hire vets, we have several that we have hired. I think people have to learn to appreciate what these men and women have done for our country. Government doesn't show them respect, that is where it starts. I don't care about political party on this issue but you want to make it a party issue.
I don't think corporations show them enough respect either.

The next 100,000 Ford gm Toyota and Honda hires should be vets. Why not?

It starts with the government, if they don't show them respect, why should anyone else? I am against forcing a business to hire anyone. You are taking the right of the business to act like a business. Again why can't the government hold out an incentive for a business to hire a vet? Then let the business make the decision. It starts with the government who created the vets.
I've suggested this before. Great idea.

I got hired once because Obama did away with the payroll tax on anyone unemployed and collecting unemployment. Then during those gov shutdown arguments the GOP stopped giving this tax breaks to companies.

One can only believe they didn't like it because it was working and the GOP didn't want Obama to succeed.
 
And you should stick to your drug dealing and tax evasion because you suck on politics and every other subject. You started the insults and if you expect me to take it from you and not fight back you are wrong.

Have a good day.
Fuck off. I did not. I backed you into an intellectual corner and you had to resort to falling back on this personal conversation you keep trying to fall back on. As if me selling weed discredits anything I say. I only find you not a douchebag on sports talk issues. Go back in your lane you mental midget. I don't want to go off on a little bitch fight with you.

Your first response to me had an attack, not my issue that you are a nut job.

You asked in your poll if it was Obama's fault, the liberals say it is his recovery and is going well. If it is Obama's recovery does he only take credit for the good and not the bad?

This is an issue that BOTH parties have ignored, anyone with a brain knows that. Democrats and Republicans for decades have had the chance to fix the veterans issues and have ignored it.

Business should not be required to hire a vet, however since they defended our country maybe a company that hires them should get a tax incentive for hiring them. Our company will hire vets, we have several that we have hired. I think people have to learn to appreciate what these men and women have done for our country. Government doesn't show them respect, that is where it starts. I don't care about political party on this issue but you want to make it a party issue.
I don't think corporations show them enough respect either.

The next 100,000 Ford gm Toyota and Honda hires should be vets. Why not?

It starts with the government, if they don't show them respect, why should anyone else? I am against forcing a business to hire anyone. You are taking the right of the business to act like a business. Again why can't the government hold out an incentive for a business to hire a vet? Then let the business make the decision. It starts with the government who created the vets.
I've suggested this before. Great idea.

I got hired once because Obama did away with the payroll tax on anyone unemployed and collecting unemployment. Then during those gov shutdown arguments the GOP stopped giving this tax breaks to companies.

One can only believe they didn't like it because it was working and the GOP didn't want Obama to succeed.

Again, party doesn't matter, as long as we all use party to divide we won't come up with solutions, which is what both parties want.

If you have a link to your statement that would be interesting to see.
 
Why are so many vets unemployed? Republicans like to say anyone who doesn't have a job is a slacker. Do they say that about the half million vets who can't find a job?

Why aren't corporations hiring these people?

Maybe it's not as easy as Republicans suggest. Do they tell the vets they're just being whiners? Do Republicans tell the vets to go back to school or just start their own business?

I want to hear Republicans give these vets the same advice you give Democrats who say they can't find a good job or any job at all.

Let's see if Republicans can keep from disrespecting the 500,000 vets who can't find a job.

And corporations need to hire vets first. That should be a policy.
I'm not sure where you're getting the 509,000 number from. As of November, it was 391,000 unemployed veterans. The unemployment rate for veterans is 3.6% even Gulf War II era veterans, who long had had a higher than national unemployment rate, are down to to 4.2%
Good! I just heard a story on unemployed vets and it upset me. Then I googled it and it said over 500,000. I hope you are correct.
 
Fuck off. I did not. I backed you into an intellectual corner and you had to resort to falling back on this personal conversation you keep trying to fall back on. As if me selling weed discredits anything I say. I only find you not a douchebag on sports talk issues. Go back in your lane you mental midget. I don't want to go off on a little bitch fight with you.

Your first response to me had an attack, not my issue that you are a nut job.

You asked in your poll if it was Obama's fault, the liberals say it is his recovery and is going well. If it is Obama's recovery does he only take credit for the good and not the bad?

This is an issue that BOTH parties have ignored, anyone with a brain knows that. Democrats and Republicans for decades have had the chance to fix the veterans issues and have ignored it.

Business should not be required to hire a vet, however since they defended our country maybe a company that hires them should get a tax incentive for hiring them. Our company will hire vets, we have several that we have hired. I think people have to learn to appreciate what these men and women have done for our country. Government doesn't show them respect, that is where it starts. I don't care about political party on this issue but you want to make it a party issue.
I don't think corporations show them enough respect either.

The next 100,000 Ford gm Toyota and Honda hires should be vets. Why not?

It starts with the government, if they don't show them respect, why should anyone else? I am against forcing a business to hire anyone. You are taking the right of the business to act like a business. Again why can't the government hold out an incentive for a business to hire a vet? Then let the business make the decision. It starts with the government who created the vets.
I've suggested this before. Great idea.

I got hired once because Obama did away with the payroll tax on anyone unemployed and collecting unemployment. Then during those gov shutdown arguments the GOP stopped giving this tax breaks to companies.

One can only believe they didn't like it because it was working and the GOP didn't want Obama to succeed.

Again, party doesn't matter, as long as we all use party to divide we won't come up with solutions, which is what both parties want.

If you have a link to your statement that would be interesting to see.
I'm on my smartphone so I don't have a link for you. I can only tell you what I remember. It was part of the deal when Republicans stopped giving extensions on unemployment. That I agreed with but I couldn't believe they didn't continue the tax breaks for companies who hire the unemployed.

And it is a fact a lot of companies won't even look at someone who's not already working. Google it. Yes it is their right but is it right? Probably makes good business sense but how's someone gonna get another job?

It makes people lie in order to get a job.
 
Your first response to me had an attack, not my issue that you are a nut job.

You asked in your poll if it was Obama's fault, the liberals say it is his recovery and is going well. If it is Obama's recovery does he only take credit for the good and not the bad?

This is an issue that BOTH parties have ignored, anyone with a brain knows that. Democrats and Republicans for decades have had the chance to fix the veterans issues and have ignored it.

Business should not be required to hire a vet, however since they defended our country maybe a company that hires them should get a tax incentive for hiring them. Our company will hire vets, we have several that we have hired. I think people have to learn to appreciate what these men and women have done for our country. Government doesn't show them respect, that is where it starts. I don't care about political party on this issue but you want to make it a party issue.
I don't think corporations show them enough respect either.

The next 100,000 Ford gm Toyota and Honda hires should be vets. Why not?

It starts with the government, if they don't show them respect, why should anyone else? I am against forcing a business to hire anyone. You are taking the right of the business to act like a business. Again why can't the government hold out an incentive for a business to hire a vet? Then let the business make the decision. It starts with the government who created the vets.
I've suggested this before. Great idea.

I got hired once because Obama did away with the payroll tax on anyone unemployed and collecting unemployment. Then during those gov shutdown arguments the GOP stopped giving this tax breaks to companies.

One can only believe they didn't like it because it was working and the GOP didn't want Obama to succeed.

Again, party doesn't matter, as long as we all use party to divide we won't come up with solutions, which is what both parties want.

If you have a link to your statement that would be interesting to see.
I'm on my smartphone so I don't have a link for you. I can only tell you what I remember. It was part of the deal when Republicans stopped giving extensions on unemployment. That I agreed with but I couldn't believe they didn't continue the tax breaks for companies who hire the unemployed.

And it is a fact a lot of companies won't even look at someone who's not already working. Google it. Yes it is their right but is it right? Probably makes good business sense but how's someone gonna get another job?

It makes people lie in order to get a job.

"Makes" people lie? Lying is a choice, no one can make you lie.

Not knowing when the tax incentive ended, I wouldn't be able to understand if it was a good deal or not.

The tax incentive was a way to get people off the unemployment roles, not a long term program.

There are reasons people aren't working, they could have a load of problems, if you hire someone who is already working, then they probably don't have work issues. The last thing a business needs is another problem.
 
I am sick and tired of this subject. By percentage, there are exactly as many unemployed Civilians as Veterans. By percentage, there are exactly as many homeless civilians as veterans. You want it stopped, create jobs, move jobs back from over seas to the US, put a lot of pressure on Corporations to do what is good for America instead of their overseas bank accounts.

Stop this blame game and go after the real culprits. Go after Congress and get them to get their hands out of the Corporate deep pockets. Force them to work for us for a change like they are supposed to be doing. Stop paying them until they stop this nonsense. Get a nation wide group together and get them all out of office. Force them to pass laws that makes it a felony to accept money for favors. When it says "For the People, By the People" it means ALL people. That seems to have been forgotten. Bring a Representative Democracy back.
 
If it's Obama economy, how come Republicans keep fucking it up? We could get more help from al Qaeda and Isis than the GOP.

According to liberals the economy is booming, all because of Obama. Are you saying it isn't as good as you liberals have claimed? Have you been lying to America?
It's better. 5.8 million jobs available? The GOP keeps blocking veterans jobs bills and keeps blocking access to education.
Still, there are 5.8 million jobs available. It's Republicans that work to keep Americans from qualifying for those jobs. I swear, those in the GOP are scum of the earth to allow that to happen.
 
Obama certainly fixed the economy bush broke.

Bush sent millions of good paying manufacturing jobs overseas. The people who had those good paying factory jobs were uneducated Americans. Those are the Americans still hurting. What do Republicans want to say to these people? Many of them are vets. This is my point.

I notice Republicans won't give the same advice to uneducated unemployed vets that they give to non vets.

Really?...explain this...

1) The top 7% wage earners under Obama have lavished in a historic 33% earnings INCREASE. While the remaining 93% of WORKING Americans have suffered on average a 5% decline. Does that sound like a "fixed economy"?
2) FACT - hundreds of $millions of Obama's TARP money went directly to companies who used the money to build factories overseas.
3) There has been a record sharp increase in corporate mergers building "super corporations" since 2012. What happens when companies merge? People lose jobs. Period. Record numbers.
4) Wall Street investment companies and the central banks profits have absolutely EXPLODED under Obama. Yet...they are still given free access to our tax money to use to build their profits...like $40 Billion...a MONTH. Yet, again, 93% of working Americans have not received one red cent of all of these record profits.

Yeah....the economy is fixed alright.
It sounds like bushanomics worked perfectly.

I thought you said Obama fixed Bush's policies? You mean he didn't?

See..here is where you show your complete ignorance.
Bush and Obama have basically identical economic policies. That is, both have been AWOL. They both let the FEDs and the Central Banks do whatever they please.
Bush went and chopped down trees and cleared brush...Obama plays golf.
Either way neither of these Presidents have involved themselves in economic policys. And that is an indisputable fact.
If you ask GOP governor Rick Snyder he will explain how Michigan is back.

The only people still hurting are the uneducated. Your only advice to them is move, go back to school or start a business.

The GOP has no help for the uneducated unemployed.

Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!
 
Really?...explain this...

1) The top 7% wage earners under Obama have lavished in a historic 33% earnings INCREASE. While the remaining 93% of WORKING Americans have suffered on average a 5% decline. Does that sound like a "fixed economy"?
2) FACT - hundreds of $millions of Obama's TARP money went directly to companies who used the money to build factories overseas.
3) There has been a record sharp increase in corporate mergers building "super corporations" since 2012. What happens when companies merge? People lose jobs. Period. Record numbers.
4) Wall Street investment companies and the central banks profits have absolutely EXPLODED under Obama. Yet...they are still given free access to our tax money to use to build their profits...like $40 Billion...a MONTH. Yet, again, 93% of working Americans have not received one red cent of all of these record profits.

Yeah....the economy is fixed alright.
It sounds like bushanomics worked perfectly.

I thought you said Obama fixed Bush's policies? You mean he didn't?

See..here is where you show your complete ignorance.
Bush and Obama have basically identical economic policies. That is, both have been AWOL. They both let the FEDs and the Central Banks do whatever they please.
Bush went and chopped down trees and cleared brush...Obama plays golf.
Either way neither of these Presidents have involved themselves in economic policys. And that is an indisputable fact.
If you ask GOP governor Rick Snyder he will explain how Michigan is back.

The only people still hurting are the uneducated. Your only advice to them is move, go back to school or start a business.

The GOP has no help for the uneducated unemployed.

Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!


All public colleges will soon offer veterans in-state tuition

State Education Benefits for Veterans | G.I. Jobs

Got it?

Good!
 
It sounds like bushanomics worked perfectly.

I thought you said Obama fixed Bush's policies? You mean he didn't?

See..here is where you show your complete ignorance.
Bush and Obama have basically identical economic policies. That is, both have been AWOL. They both let the FEDs and the Central Banks do whatever they please.
Bush went and chopped down trees and cleared brush...Obama plays golf.
Either way neither of these Presidents have involved themselves in economic policys. And that is an indisputable fact.
If you ask GOP governor Rick Snyder he will explain how Michigan is back.

The only people still hurting are the uneducated. Your only advice to them is move, go back to school or start a business.

The GOP has no help for the uneducated unemployed.

Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!


All public colleges will soon offer veterans in-state tuition

State Education Benefits for Veterans | G.I. Jobs

Got it?

Good!

Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.
 
Why are so many vets unemployed? Republicans like to say anyone who doesn't have a job is a slacker. Do they say that about the half million vets who can't find a job?

Why aren't corporations hiring these people?

Maybe it's not as easy as Republicans suggest. Do they tell the vets they're just being whiners? Do Republicans tell the vets to go back to school or just start their own business?

I want to hear Republicans give these vets the same advice you give Democrats who say they can't find a good job or any job at all.

Let's see if Republicans can keep from disrespecting the 500,000 vets who can't find a job.

And corporations need to hire vets first. That should be a policy.

Some people - Vets included are not marketable, have an attitude problem.....or a poor outlook on life included with an attitude problem.

There are some great vets....really great vets whom have skills acquired from the Military, or are willing to take job retraining - and/or college. Some Vets are willing to work 12 and 14 hour days.

Some Vets - Don't want to work an hour, and tell others...."You owe me". Well, no one owes anyone a life. You have to want, you have to reach out and try to grab. Don't set at home and expect little gremlins to walk in and hand you a job, or a check each week. It is not going to happen.

I am a veteran. I know. I know Vets - and some yes......have attitude and demeanor problems. You show up to a job interview, don't wear worn jeans and leather boots.....showing off all the tattoos up and down your arm, when you forgot to take a shower the past week. And you language and vocabulary is that of a 10 year old. "Well...uh...uh........ cuz I wannna work." "I treat you fair and I can be from my crib to here at the job site in only 45 minutes."

Some people ( Vets ) do not want a job, do their best to flunk an interview - intentionally mess up their application, or fill it out like a 5 year old wrote it - so they will not get hired. They get State Unemployment benefits for X amount of months - then they set home all day. Some wind up in the State Welfare system permanently - living off of mine and yours tax dollars. It happens.

Like I told a few of my colleagues, I would love to be a State Insurance Investigator and investigate "Dead Beats" whom are stealing from "The system". The only thing wrong with them is laziness ; they are stealing from hard working men and women, children, the education system.....and others. The money they "Steal" could be appropriated somewhere else to help someone whom really needs it = education - roads - infrastructure.....ect..ect.

As Garth Brooks sang - " American Honkey Tonk Bar Association". ---> "We reach for those who are down".


Shadow 355
 
((( Bless them all.....Bless all vets! )))



They are the ones who will fight for liberty!

There is a small percentage of Vets whom want nothing but a handout. They have the "You owe me" attitude.

The other 98% are warriors and heroes all the way !


Shadow 355 ( Combat Veteran - US Army )
 
I thought you said Obama fixed Bush's policies? You mean he didn't?

See..here is where you show your complete ignorance.
Bush and Obama have basically identical economic policies. That is, both have been AWOL. They both let the FEDs and the Central Banks do whatever they please.
Bush went and chopped down trees and cleared brush...Obama plays golf.
Either way neither of these Presidents have involved themselves in economic policys. And that is an indisputable fact.
If you ask GOP governor Rick Snyder he will explain how Michigan is back.

The only people still hurting are the uneducated. Your only advice to them is move, go back to school or start a business.

The GOP has no help for the uneducated unemployed.

Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!


All public colleges will soon offer veterans in-state tuition

State Education Benefits for Veterans | G.I. Jobs

Got it?

Good!

Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.



We have had what? Eighty plus years to correct the problem and on
Y now does anyone try to correct it?

Again, both parties have failed the military for decades. It is a government issue not a party issue. My dad fought in WWII in Germany in battle and was not eligible for benefits, because he was a month short of two years. Honorably discharged, got medals for killing and capturing German soldiers but was indelible because of being under two years. They government has had decades to fix issues and chose not to. I don't care if you are a republican or a democrat, you ignored outer troops for decades.

So take your partisan bullshit and stick it. My father served his country and lawmakers didn't give a fuck what happened to him afterwards.
 
If you ask GOP governor Rick Snyder he will explain how Michigan is back.

The only people still hurting are the uneducated. Your only advice to them is move, go back to school or start a business.

The GOP has no help for the uneducated unemployed.

Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!


All public colleges will soon offer veterans in-state tuition

State Education Benefits for Veterans | G.I. Jobs

Got it?

Good!

Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.



We have had what? Eighty plus years to correct the problem and on
Y now does anyone try to correct it?

Again, both parties have failed the military for decades. It is a government issue not a party issue. My dad fought in WWII in Germany in battle and was not eligible for benefits, because he was a month short of two years. Honorably discharged, got medals for killing and capturing German soldiers but was indelible because of being under two years. They government has had decades to fix issues and chose not to. I don't care if you are a republican or a democrat, you ignored outer troops for decades.

So take your partisan bullshit and stick it. My father served his country and lawmakers didn't give a fuck what happened to him afterwards.

Actually back when Obama ran against McCain veteran groups found Democrats voted for the troops 80% of the time and McCain/Republicans voted for the troops 20%.

Republicans voted for the missions and defense spending 100% of the time but the troops only 20%
 
If you ask GOP governor Rick Snyder he will explain how Michigan is back.

The only people still hurting are the uneducated. Your only advice to them is move, go back to school or start a business.

The GOP has no help for the uneducated unemployed.

Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!


All public colleges will soon offer veterans in-state tuition

State Education Benefits for Veterans | G.I. Jobs

Got it?

Good!

Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.



We have had what? Eighty plus years to correct the problem and on
Y now does anyone try to correct it?

Again, both parties have failed the military for decades. It is a government issue not a party issue. My dad fought in WWII in Germany in battle and was not eligible for benefits, because he was a month short of two years. Honorably discharged, got medals for killing and capturing German soldiers but was indelible because of being under two years. They government has had decades to fix issues and chose not to. I don't care if you are a republican or a democrat, you ignored outer troops for decades.

So take your partisan bullshit and stick it. My father served his country and lawmakers didn't give a fuck what happened to him afterwards.


Your Father would have the right to make your comments. You don't. My Father served in WWII and Korea, My Uncles did as well. My Grandfather and his brothers served in WWI. I served for 20 years, myself. For one that hasn't paid the price, you certainly are mouthy.

Since you sit on your ass and just bitch, you are a prime example of why it isn't fixed.
 
Again with the party BS. It is not the party it is the government, we have had this issue for decades, whether Congress was a d or R majority or whether the President was a D of R. Time to take the party out of it and work on solutions.

Education is one of the points that the Armed Services uses to attract recruits, where is the breakdown there?
Yea, where?



GOP cuts education nationwide - Google Search

Do you get it?

Good!


All public colleges will soon offer veterans in-state tuition

State Education Benefits for Veterans | G.I. Jobs

Got it?

Good!

Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.



We have had what? Eighty plus years to correct the problem and on
Y now does anyone try to correct it?

Again, both parties have failed the military for decades. It is a government issue not a party issue. My dad fought in WWII in Germany in battle and was not eligible for benefits, because he was a month short of two years. Honorably discharged, got medals for killing and capturing German soldiers but was indelible because of being under two years. They government has had decades to fix issues and chose not to. I don't care if you are a republican or a democrat, you ignored outer troops for decades.

So take your partisan bullshit and stick it. My father served his country and lawmakers didn't give a fuck what happened to him afterwards.


Your Father would have the right to make your comments. You don't. My Father served in WWII and Korea, My Uncles did as well. My Grandfather and his brothers served in WWI. I served for 20 years, myself. For one that hasn't paid the price, you certainly are mouthy.

Since you sit on your ass and just bitch, you are a prime example of why it isn't fixed.

Hes one of those Republican apologists who hates being told its the GOP's fault. I wouldn't call him a right but he's definitely not voting hillary.
 

Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.



We have had what? Eighty plus years to correct the problem and on
Y now does anyone try to correct it?

Again, both parties have failed the military for decades. It is a government issue not a party issue. My dad fought in WWII in Germany in battle and was not eligible for benefits, because he was a month short of two years. Honorably discharged, got medals for killing and capturing German soldiers but was indelible because of being under two years. They government has had decades to fix issues and chose not to. I don't care if you are a republican or a democrat, you ignored outer troops for decades.

So take your partisan bullshit and stick it. My father served his country and lawmakers didn't give a fuck what happened to him afterwards.


Your Father would have the right to make your comments. You don't. My Father served in WWII and Korea, My Uncles did as well. My Grandfather and his brothers served in WWI. I served for 20 years, myself. For one that hasn't paid the price, you certainly are mouthy.

Since you sit on your ass and just bitch, you are a prime example of why it isn't fixed.

Hes one of those Republican apologists who hates being told its the GOP's fault. I wouldn't call him a right but he's definitely not voting hillary.


He isn't any worse off than you are. Yes, it's the GOPs fault but it's also the Dems fault. It's so much easier blaming the other side than actually doing something about it.
 
Did you bother reading your link????

S.2450 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014
Sponsor: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (Introduced 06/09/2014)
Latest Action: There is no latest action for this bill
Notes: For further action, see H.R.3230, which became Public Law 113-146 on 8/7/2014.

A bill from Bernie Sanders? Don't tell me Republicans are trying to take credit for it.

Then in you other link, go down through the list of states and see how the benefits differ. Especially Wisconsin. Here, let me help:

Under the Wisconsin G.I. Bill Tuition Remission Program for Dependents, 100 percent of tuition is awarded to qualifying dependents. Veterans Education (VetEd) reimbursement grants are available to veterans who already applied for Wisconsin GI Bill benefits and provide tuition reimbursement based on years of active duty service.

Do you see that? "REIMBURSEMENT"! Do you know what that means? It means you have to pay the cost first and then you can get reimbursement later. But they don't have the money to pay in the first place. Sneaky. It's the GOP's way of pretending to help but only helping those who already have the money to pay.


We have had what? Eighty plus years to correct the problem and on
Y now does anyone try to correct it?

Again, both parties have failed the military for decades. It is a government issue not a party issue. My dad fought in WWII in Germany in battle and was not eligible for benefits, because he was a month short of two years. Honorably discharged, got medals for killing and capturing German soldiers but was indelible because of being under two years. They government has had decades to fix issues and chose not to. I don't care if you are a republican or a democrat, you ignored outer troops for decades.

So take your partisan bullshit and stick it. My father served his country and lawmakers didn't give a fuck what happened to him afterwards.

Your Father would have the right to make your comments. You don't. My Father served in WWII and Korea, My Uncles did as well. My Grandfather and his brothers served in WWI. I served for 20 years, myself. For one that hasn't paid the price, you certainly are mouthy.

Since you sit on your ass and just bitch, you are a prime example of why it isn't fixed.
Hes one of those Republican apologists who hates being told its the GOP's fault. I wouldn't call him a right but he's definitely not voting hillary.

He isn't any worse off than you are. Yes, it's the GOPs fault but it's also the Dems fault. It's so much easier blaming the other side than actually doing something about it.
I try my friend, I try.
 
Back
Top Bottom