4.9 Million Illegal Aliens Crossed US Border in 18 Months Since Biden Took Office: Report

[Dagosa]

Not sure what metric you're using to determine "poor." Looking at poverty rates by race, blacks and hispanics outnumber whites by a long shot:

Poverty “ rates” do not reflect the actual monies spent or impact. The actual number does. The number of poverty among whites far exceeds either group. You saw the numbers. It’s the actual number non math person.
The rate just gives a racist a bone to harp on.

Poverty in red states exceeds that in blue states. Poverty in rural area exceeds that in cities. Most red states are more rural. That’s where the numbers come from……rural rd states, the poorest, most crime ridden and worse places to live.

But everyone knows that.

 

[jotathought]

Poverty “ rates” do not reflect the actual monies spent or impact. The actual number does. The number of poverty among whites far exceeds either group. You saw the numbers. It’s the actual number non math person.
The rate just gives a racist a bone to harp on.

Poverty in red states exceeds that in blue states. Poverty in rural area exceeds that in cities. Most red states are more rural. That’s where the numbers come from……rural rd states, the poorest, most crime ridden and worse places to live.

But everyone knows that.

The rate indicates the percentage of the population on poverty, categorized by race. The number of people is insignificant, although, blacks represent 13-14% of the U.S. population, and this means proportionately, there are more blacks in poverty.
States are insignificant, as the epicenter of minority living, government dependence and poverty are typically urban areas.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Nope. The absolute value of the total number of whites that are poor, simply makes it a bigger problem. It doesn’t matter what proportionality exist.
It there lived just one white on an island with a hundred blacks and he was poor while 10 blacks were, would you make the stupid argument that 100% of whites were poor so it’s a bigger problem ? No, math illiterate, THE total of the larger POPULATION COSTS more and has more bearing on the quality of life.

Get real, there are more whites in poverty, mostly in more rural areas that you don‘t seem to whine about. Poverty is the problem and it’s not just race based.

So how many whites are there, and blacks, and how many of each group are on welfare?

 

[Captain Caveman]

Here are the facts….
…..the white poor outnumber the black poor considerably, 19 to 7.8 million. White people make up 42 percent of America’s poor, black people about 28 percent.

Progress.

There are 251.82 million white people in the US.

There are 44.83 million black/African American in the US.

So 19/251.82 = 7.54% whites on welfare

So 7.8/44.83 = 17.39% blacks on welfare

So as a percentage of the population, there are over twice as many blacks per 100,000 per racial group on welfare.

Population by race in the U.S. 2021 | Statista

I think that you need to start and think more.

 

[Lisa558]

Progress.

There are 251.82 million white people in the US.

There are 44.83 million black/African American in the US.

So 19/251.82 = 7.54% whites on welfare

So 7.8/44.83 = 17.39% blacks on welfare

So as a percentage of the population, there are over twice as many blacks per 100,000 per racial group on welfare.

Population by race in the U.S. 2021 | Statista

I think that you need to start and think more.

It’s been explained over and over. Example of what I tried by way of clarification:

Lib in Denial: There are more whites on welfare than blacks!

Me: And there are more whites who are successful and paying taxes than blacks!

Lib: Well, duh….that’s because there are more whites!

For some reason, they understand that whites contribute more into the government because there are more of them, but then pretend they don’t understand that the same applies to welfare.

 

[Mac-7]

Joe Biden's war on America. And forcing taxpayers to pay for them, to give them phones, SNAP cards, pay their rent, medical care, etc. Not to mention the massive expense of dealing with them, and processing them.

No country can long exist under such continuing circumstances.

​

Nearly 5 million illegal immigrants have crossed U.S. borders in the 18 months since President Joe Biden took office, according to a new report.​

​

A total of 4.9 million illegal aliens, including some 900,000 “gotaways” who evaded apprehension and have since disappeared into American communities, have entered the country by the end of July, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) said in a statement on Aug. 16.​

​

“Roughly the equivalent of the entire population of Ireland has illegally entered the United States in the 18 months President Biden has been in office, with many being released into American communities,” FAIR President Dan Stein said in the statement.​

​

He blamed Biden for putting the unprecedented surge down to external factors, not the administration’s own “sabotage” of immigration laws. After rolling back key Trump-era policies, Biden presided over the largest number of apprehensions of illegal immigrants at the U.S.–Mexico border in a calendar year in history, recording almost 1.9 million arrests last year.​

​

“The endless flow of illegal aliens and the incursion of lethal narcotics pouring across our border will not end until this administration demonstrates a willingness to enforce our laws,” Stein said.​

​

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.​

​

New Surge​

​

Two million illegal aliens have entered the country in the first 10 months of this fiscal year, according to data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). In June, more than 207,000 illegal immigrants were apprehended attempting to cross the U.S.–Mexico border, making this the highest number of June apprehensions in history.​

​

Although July saw a slim decline in CBP encounters at the southwest border of nearly 200,000, it turned out to be the 17th straight month with more than 150,000 encounters, representing a 325 percent increase over the average number of July apprehensions under the Trump administration, the statement reads.​

​

Among the more than 213,000 illegal aliens deported from the border in July, only 37 percent of the arrests led to expulsions under Title 42—a 7 percent drop from last month. Border agents processed the majority of the rest under Title 8, which oftentimes lets illegal aliens be released into the U.S. interior while their cases sit in backlogged immigration courts.​

​

The Biden administration announced it would end the Trump-era Title 42, a border policy put in place on public health grounds amid the COVID-19 pandemic, which it had been forced to keep in place owing to a lack of notice.​

​

...​

4.9 Million Illegal Aliens Crossed US Border in 18 Months Since Biden Took Office: Report

www.theepochtimes.com

Biden is truly waging war on America

 

[Mac-7]

Here are the facts….
…..the white poor outnumber the black poor considerably, 19 to 7.8 million. White people make up 42 percent of America’s poor, black people about 28 percent.

Do libs like this guy really believe the bullshit they spout?

 

[Lisa558]

Do libs like this guy really believe the bullshit they spout?

I don’t think so. They understand the meaning of per-capita. See my post above, #145.

 

[Mac-7]

I don’t think so. They understand the meaning of per-capita. See my post above.

So they are playing the fool just to be argumentative?

That in itself requires a special kind of stupidity

Meanwhile they support policies they are destroying America

 

[Lisa558]

So they are playing the fool just to be argumentative?

That in itself requires a special kind of stupidity

Meanwhile they support policies they are destroying America

Yes, they are - on so many levels.

 

[LilOlLady]

Stupid bitch, that was a quote and not mine. From your white Christian bible.

POVERTY DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE. MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
The problem I have with uncontrolled immigration has nothing to do with race or skilled workers, but with population growth that that we cannot sustain ecological, environmental and depletion of our nation resources. Money cannot fix the effect of global warming.
More people means an increased demand for food, water, housing, energy, healthcare, transportation, and more. And all that consumption contributes to ecological degradation, increased conflicts, and a higher risk of large-scale disasters like pandemics.
In 2019, with the loss of nearly 630,000 unborn lives, abortion cost the U.S. roughly $6.9 trillion, or 32 percent of GDP.
“Based on these findings, more than 23 million adults in the United States have struggled with problematic drug use,” said George F. Koob, Ph.D., NIAAA director. (Drug cartels heaven)

In the 20 years since 9/11, far-right extremists killed more people in the US than did American-based Islamist fundamentalists – but that’s often hard to discern from the way the federal government has treated domestic terrorism.
Aside from overpopulation, America should not have a problem with poor hard working illegal immigrants.

 

[Lisa558]

And in the years since 2000, Islamic extremists have killed thousands more than “right-wing” extremists. Interesting how you skip over the biggest terrorist attack in our lifetimes to make your point.

 

[LilOlLady]

In order to feed the growing population....We, Americans, keep replacing one problem with another problem.

Will lab-grown meat help to feed the growing population more sustainably?


CO2 takes a lot longer to dissipate than the methane that's currently produced by cows. 2019 study from the University of Oxford, replacing current livestock systems with lab-grown meat production before energy generation is decarbonized increases the risk of long-term, negative climate impact greatly

If lab-cultured "meat" enters the market, there are several human health concerns associated with this new production method, specifically that these genetically-modified cell lines could exhibit the characteristics of a cancerous cell.

DON'T FUCK WITH MOTHER NATURE.

 

[Dagosa]

The number of people is insignificant,

You can’t be serious. If the only two people of a particular race were poor, that would mean their poverty rate is 100%.
So, it’s rediculous to say that’s more important then the actual number of peoples who are poor. Geesus, how could you even run a business and order merchandise if all you cared about were rates and not the actual number of product you needed to buy wholesale ? Are you completely out of it ?

The govs that have to pay out for needs of the poor, pay out by the actual number of people in need. They don’t give a fk about your stupid idea that fewer people will cost more simple because they are black.

 

[Dagosa]

And in the years since 2000, Islamic extremists have killed thousands more than “right-wing” extremists. Interesting how you skip over the biggest terrorist attack in our lifetimes to make your point.

We skip over it because right wing mass murders are happening frequently. You want to play the numbers game ? Let’s blame the conservative BUSH gov in power and their incompetence in letting 9/11 occur. You’re own lead Humper Trump reminded us all of that. Then, the same Bush incompetents go to an unfounded war and create MORE terrorists to deal with along with the greatest recession since 1929.

 

[jotathought]

You can’t be serious. If the only two people of a particular race were poor, that would mean their poverty rate is 100%.
So, it’s rediculous to say that’s more important then the actual number of peoples who are poor. Geesus, how could you even run a business and order merchandise if all you cared about was rates and not the actual number of product you needed to buy wholesale ? Are you completely illiterate.

The govs that have to pay out for neds of the poor, pay out by the actual number of people in need. They don’t give a fk about your stupid idea that fewer people will cost more simple because they are black.

It's basic math and statistics, and is used in actuarial and quoting activities for insurance companies assessing risk and cost. If one group with 100,000 members has 2% of its population with comorbidities vs. a group with 10,000 members with 15% comorbidities, guess which group would pay more?

The number is not significant .. and in this case, a smaller percentage of the population represents a much higher percentage of those in poverty. Proportionality, there are more blacks in poverty.

 

[Dagosa]

It's basic math and statistics, and is used in actuarial and quoting activities for insurance companies assessing risk and cost. If one group with 100,000 members has 2% of its population with comorbidities vs. a group with 10,000 members with 15% comorbidities, guess which group would pay more?

The number is not significant .. and in this case, a smaller percentage of the population represents a much higher percentage of those in poverty. Proportionality, there are more blacks in poverty.

Ha ha
So the group pays more for their insurance. Thats hilarious. Are you shitting me ? The US is not an insurance company. Maybe you didn’t know that. We pay taxes, not premiums.


Are you arguing that black poverty is a bigger problem even though more whites are in poverty ? What’s your problem with blacks ?


…...the white poor outnumber the black poor considerably, 19 to 7.8 million. White people make up 42 percent of America’s poor, black people about 28 percent…..

So tell us. Which is more of the problem, 19 million in poverty, or 7.8 million ? You are delusional.

Check out the % too. In poverty 42% are white, 28% are black

YOUR STATEMENT IS WRONG. The rates are higher for black, but the actual numbers are MUCH HIGHER FOR WHITES.

 

[Dagosa]

It's basic math and statistics, and is used in actuarial and quoting activities for insurance companies assessing risk and cost. If one group with 100,000 members has 2% of its population with comorbidities vs. a group with 10,000 members with 15% comorbidities, guess which group would pay more?

The number is not significant .. and in this case, a smaller percentage of the population represents a much higher percentage of those in poverty. Proportionality, there are more blacks in poverty.

By your reasoning we should charging Taxes too by race ? So even though more then TWICE the number of whites are in poverty ?

 

[jotathought]

Ha ha
So the group pays more for their insurance. Thats hilarious. Are you shitting me ? The US is not an insurance company. Maybe you didn’t know that. We pay taxes, not premiums.


Are you arguing that black poverty is a bigger problem even though more whites are in poverty ? What’s your problem with blacks ?


…...the white poor outnumber the black poor considerably, 19 to 7.8 million. White people make up 42 percent of America’s poor, black people about 28 percent…..

So tell us. Which is more of the problem, 19 million in poverty, or 7.8 million ? You are delusional.

Check out the % too. In poverty 42% are white, 28% are black

YOUR STATEMENT IS WRONG. The rates are higher for black, but the actual numbers are MUCH HIGHER FOR WHITES.

You've missed the point, and I would anticipate this if you're not a math person. A smaller percentage of an overall population with a higher percentage of a participating sample means it represents a proportionately more of the population.

 

[Lisa558]

We skip over it because right wing mass murders are happening frequently. You want to play the numbers game ? Let’s blame the conservative BUSH gov in power and their incompetence in letting 9/11 occur. You’re own lead Humper Trump reminded us all of that. Then, the same Bush incompetents go to an unfounded war and create MORE terrorists to deal with along with the greatest recession since 1929.

No, you skip over it because Muslims are part of your protected groups. Obama wasn’t even willing to SAY “Islamic terrorist”!