37-7

That is a very interesting (unverified) fact. If true, it deserves to be examined from a cause and effect standpoint. On the surface, it does seem to make sense.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
That's the score. Mass shootings after common internet social interaction (1998-ish) vs before.
I don't count muslim murder because that's a completely separate dynamic.

http://timelines.latimes.com/deadliest-shooting-rampages/

No idea what "after common internet social interaction" means but I get a score of 50 to 3.
That's male shooters to female. And of course doesn't include the one yesterday.
I'm talking about when the internet became a common social thing. Prior to that it was mainly programmers and geeks who utilized internet interaction. Primitive listservs, etc.
And the gender disparity is significant, especially in this era where fathers are disappearing and their roles discounted by leftists.
 
That's the score. Mass shootings after common internet social interaction (1998-ish) vs before.
I don't count muslim murder because that's a completely separate dynamic.

http://timelines.latimes.com/deadliest-shooting-rampages/

No idea what "after common internet social interaction" means but I get a score of 50 to 3.
That's male shooters to female. And of course doesn't include the one yesterday.
I'm talking about when the internet became a common social thing. Prior to that it was mainly programmers and geeks who utilized internet interaction. Primitive listservs, etc.
And the gender disparity is significant, especially in this era where fathers are disappearing and their roles discounted by leftists.

I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.
 
I don't know if they will find a correlation between social media and mass shootings, but I firmly believe that social media will be one of, if not the single root cause of the complete unraveling of this country.
 
That's the score. Mass shootings after common internet social interaction (1998-ish) vs before.
I don't count muslim murder because that's a completely separate dynamic.

http://timelines.latimes.com/deadliest-shooting-rampages/

No idea what "after common internet social interaction" means but I get a score of 50 to 3.
That's male shooters to female. And of course doesn't include the one yesterday.
I'm talking about when the internet became a common social thing. Prior to that it was mainly programmers and geeks who utilized internet interaction. Primitive listservs, etc.
And the gender disparity is significant, especially in this era where fathers are disappearing and their roles discounted by leftists.

I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.
So you’re a sexist as well as a racist. No surprise.
Males are naturally more aggressive so the disparity is no surprise to objective people.
The internet factor is too conspicuous to discount.
 
Crackas have been committing terrorist attacks against each other since well before the internet
With the frequency of these mass shootings? Where’s your stats?
Maybe you’re right. The internet brings terrorists added notoriety. Without the internet, maybe white and Muslim terrorism would go down a lot.
 
I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.


That thing about social structures operating independent of politics, and being unsure how much the internet is to blame for the west's decent into madness. Like, wow... do you live under a rock or something? Leftist social justice warriors have declared all out war on long-established social norms, and they use the internet to do it.
 
I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.


That thing about social structures operating independent of politics, and being unsure how much the internet is to blame for the west's decent into madness. Like, wow... do you live under a rock or something? Leftist social justice warriors have declared all out war on long-established social norms, and they use the internet to do it.

Once AGAIN --- and this is not in any way new --- social structures have zero to do with politics. To the extent they intersect at all, social structure leads, politics follows. Far behind.

You cannot legislate culture. That's (again) why throwing laws at gun violence won't work.
 
I don't know if they will find a correlation between social media and mass shootings, but I firmly believe that social media will be one of, if not the single root cause of the complete unraveling of this country.

It plays a big role in desensitizing kids who aren't able to process information through any kind of filter resembling reality. Porn and violent video games is a big factor in breaking down cultural mores, attitudes toward other people, etc.. The ability to connect with other nutjobs is increased, too; they can develop their own peer group echo chambers and reinforce each others' mental illnesses.
 
I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.


That thing about social structures operating independent of politics, and being unsure how much the internet is to blame for the west's decent into madness. Like, wow... do you live under a rock or something? Leftist social justice warriors have declared all out war on long-established social norms, and they use the internet to do it.

Once AGAIN --- and this is not in any way new --- social structures have zero to do with politics. To the extent they intersect at all, social structure leads, politics follows. Far behind.


Did your marxist sociology professor teach you that drivel?
 
I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.


That thing about social structures operating independent of politics, and being unsure how much the internet is to blame for the west's decent into madness. Like, wow... do you live under a rock or something? Leftist social justice warriors have declared all out war on long-established social norms, and they use the internet to do it.

Once AGAIN --- and this is not in any way new --- social structures have zero to do with politics. To the extent they intersect at all, social structure leads, politics follows. Far behind.


Did your marxist sociology professor teach you that drivel?

Nope. Didn't have one. It's simply how the world works. Thanks for being unable to refute it, not that such would have been possible anyway.
 
That's the score. Mass shootings after common internet social interaction (1998-ish) vs before.
I don't count muslim murder because that's a completely separate dynamic.

http://timelines.latimes.com/deadliest-shooting-rampages/

No idea what "after common internet social interaction" means but I get a score of 50 to 3.
That's male shooters to female. And of course doesn't include the one yesterday.

Thanks! I was like WTF, is it just me?
 
That's the score. Mass shootings after common internet social interaction (1998-ish) vs before.
I don't count muslim murder because that's a completely separate dynamic.

http://timelines.latimes.com/deadliest-shooting-rampages/

No idea what "after common internet social interaction" means but I get a score of 50 to 3.
That's male shooters to female. And of course doesn't include the one yesterday.
I'm talking about when the internet became a common social thing. Prior to that it was mainly programmers and geeks who utilized internet interaction. Primitive listservs, etc.
And the gender disparity is significant, especially in this era where fathers are disappearing and their roles discounted by leftists.

Ah. I've used the Internet since the eighties. Hmm ... I was a programmer and a geek, you have a point ...
 
I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.

That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?

Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.


That thing about social structures operating independent of politics, and being unsure how much the internet is to blame for the west's decent into madness. Like, wow... do you live under a rock or something? Leftist social justice warriors have declared all out war on long-established social norms, and they use the internet to do it.

Once AGAIN --- and this is not in any way new --- social structures have zero to do with politics. To the extent they intersect at all, social structure leads, politics follows. Far behind.


Did your marxist sociology professor teach you that drivel?

Nope. Didn't have one. It's simply how the world works. Thanks for being unable to refute it, not that such would have been possible anyway.

Wow, you must be really smart to have summed up "how the world works" in a single sentence. Either that, or you just say empty words with a haughty demeanor. What do you mean, "social structure"...? Family units? Are you saying families are not effected by the decisions made by politicians?
 

Forum List

Back
Top