That's the score. Mass shootings after common internet social interaction (1998-ish) vs before.
I don't count muslim murder because that's a completely separate dynamic.
http://timelines.latimes.com/deadliest-shooting-rampages/
No idea what "after common internet social interaction" means but I get a score of 50 to 3.
That's male shooters to female. And of course doesn't include the one yesterday.
I'm talking about when the internet became a common social thing. Prior to that it was mainly programmers and geeks who utilized internet interaction. Primitive listservs, etc.
And the gender disparity is significant, especially in this era where fathers are disappearing and their roles discounted by leftists.
I don't see an internet pattern here but certainly the gender disparity has always been significant. In fact this 50-3 score is the most female-heavy I think could be counted at all, even if one was a co-conspirator.
That has everything to do with indicating a masculinity problem at the base. Sorry but that's got nothing to do with "leftists" or any kind of politics at all. Social structures operate completely outside of politics. Who knew, right?
Perhaps there may be a case to be made that the internet has exacerbated the whole dynamic, perhaps not. But it's undeniable that it's a masculinity issue.